New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Quarantine Zone.

Liberal-Quaranteen-copy.jpg
 
your map and his are not all that different, Craig. I'm just sayin.
Especially when you figure a lot of those "blue" states have republican governors. That's exactly where Obama concentrated his voter fraud operation. states like Ohio had more voters than were registered.
 
your map and his are not all that different, Craig. I'm just sayin.

Not all that different, except for Ohio, Virginia, Florida, Nevada and New Mexico. Call it 41 million people and 10 percent of the states. Nah...not all that different.
 
Especially when you figure a lot of those "blue" states have republican governors. That's exactly where Obama concentrated his voter fraud operation. states like Ohio had more voters than were registered.

states like Ohio had more voters than were registered.


Nonsense.
 
Yeah, and we're paying the price for it.

Not a real good reflection on the intelligence of the American Citizen.
Actually, it is. Re-electing the guy who allowed 9/11, invaded the wrong country in response and turned a balanced budget into record deficits and a recession might be a better example of American stupidity.
 
Especially when you figure a lot of those "blue" states have republican governors. That's exactly where Obama concentrated his voter fraud operation. states like Ohio had more voters than were registered.
You'll believe anything that extrudes out the butthole of the echo chamber.
 
states like Ohio had more voters than were registered.

Nonsense.

Really? Talk is cheap

"It has become blatantly obvious the voter fraud that was committed during the 2012 Presidential elections. In one county alone in Ohio, which was a battleground state, President Obama received 106,258 votes. But there were only 98,213 eligible voters. It's not humanly possible to get 108 percent of the vote!"

An analysis by The Columbus Dispatch in September found that more than one out of every five registered Ohio voters is probably ineligible to vote.


Politifact tries to spin it, but fails to anyone who can read between the lines.

http://www.politifact.com/ohio/stat...-petition-claims-obama-got-more-votes-one-co/
 
Really? Talk is cheap

"It has become blatantly obvious the voter fraud that was committed during the 2012 Presidential elections. In one county alone in Ohio, which was a battleground state, President Obama received 106,258 votes. But there were only 98,213 eligible voters. It's not humanly possible to get 108 percent of the vote!"

An analysis by The Columbus Dispatch in September found that more than one out of every five registered Ohio voters is probably ineligible to vote.


Politifact tries to spin it, but fails to anyone who can read between the lines.

http://www.politifact.com/ohio/stat...-petition-claims-obama-got-more-votes-one-co/

...Terry Burton, director of the Wood County Board of Elections, doesn’t know why fabricated claims about votes in Wood County, Ohio, are swirling around the Internet. “The misrepresentations of the outcome of the 2012 elections … continue to be [a] mystery and a point of frustration to our office,” he told us in an email. The actual results, he said, “are plainly available on our website.”

The viral claims include a made-up statistic about Wood County’s results:

Claim: In 21 districts in Wood County Ohio, Obama received 100% of the votes where GOP inspectors were illegally removed from their polling locations – and not one single vote was recorded for Romney. (Another statistical impossibility).

Actually, Obama didn’t get 100 percent of the vote in any district in Wood County, as anyone can clearly see on the election board’s website. Obama garnered 51.21 percent of the vote overall in the county.



http://www.factcheck.org/2013/01/voting-conspiracies/
 
Really? Talk is cheap

"It has become blatantly obvious the voter fraud that was committed during the 2012 Presidential elections. In one county alone in Ohio, which was a battleground state, President Obama received 106,258 votes. But there were only 98,213 eligible voters. It's not humanly possible to get 108 percent of the vote!"

An analysis by The Columbus Dispatch in September found that more than one out of every five registered Ohio voters is probably ineligible to vote.


Politifact tries to spin it, but fails to anyone who can read between the lines.

http://www.politifact.com/ohio/stat...-petition-claims-obama-got-more-votes-one-co/

...Actually, according to the Ohio Secretary of State data, 63,948 votes were cast for president in Wood County in 2012, with 32,802 votes for Obama, 29,704 for Romney, and 1,442 for other candidates. Once again, the figures in the email are completely off base.

What the anonymous author is attempting to question is the number of registered voters in Wood County, a figure that is artificially high because of college students at Bowling Green State University remaining on the voter rolls. There were 108,014 registered voters in the county, according to the Secretary of State website. But the totalpopulation of Wood County is 126,355, with only about 99,000 of those over the age of 18. The apparent discrepancy comes from Bowling Green students not canceling their registrations when they graduate and leave the area. Burton told the Columbus Dispatchthat nonactive voters stay on registration rolls for two election cycles before the election board tries to contact them. Then, it’s two more cycles before anyone the board can’t find is deleted. That means college students can remain on registration lists for more than a decade after they’ve left Wood County. Back in 2004, for instance, there were 90,688 registered voters in the county, but only 64,103 showed up at the polls to vote.

Wood County follows federal laws for removing inactive voters. Says Burton: “Wood County has worked closely with the Ohio Secretary of State’s office to ensure that we are continuing to do everything within our power to make Wood County voter rolls as accurate as possible within the bounds of federal and state laws.”
 
Actually, it is. Re-electing the guy who allowed 9/11, invaded the wrong country in response and turned a balanced budget into record deficits and a recession might be a better example of American stupidity.

BWAHAHAHAHA, "Allowed 9/11?" That operation occurred less than 8 months into his presidency, after the embassy and Cole bombings.

Invaded the wrong country, well then just about every Democrat, who under Clinton stated that Sadam had WMD's gave him approval, not to mention it's hard to believe he'd send 150,000 troops over to prove he lied.

A balanced budget into record deficits. Yes Bush was a big spending republican, but that budget was balance BY NEWT and his republicans in Congress, who forced a shutdown to achieve it, and those 'record deficits' are not close to the ones Obama ran.

And finally the recession. Look to the Sub prime market that got that ball rolling.

The sub prime market was created by HUD secretary Democrat Mario Cuomo under Bill Clinton.


It's almost laughable the spin you and the media promoted at the time, when anyone who can check facts, would realize how ridiculous you people are. Too bad, too many or too lazy to do so.

And the same people (Obamabots) that created the mess are now creating a gigantic sub prime stock market bubble, a record expanding sub prime welfare state, destroying our military, and funding our enemies.

Congrats, your lies were successful.
 
Reality check:

non-payers-by-state.jpeg
You know why that is? Because of the graduated income tax that taxes high earners at a higher percentage. And that's what happens when you raise taxes on the rich.

That's why those that are for increasing taxes on the rich are screwing themselves if they live in blue states

Why? since the blue states have the highest costs of living, the people there have to make more money even simply to pay the basics. So it's simple math that states that under the graduated income tax, states with a higher percentage of higher income earners will have a higher tax liability.

And you actually proved my point about Liberals staying in their zone of High taxes. Please stay there and don't come down here and raise my cost of living and my taxes so that I too have a higher tax liability.

Bwahahahahaha.
 
BWAHAHAHAHA, "Allowed 9/11?" That operation occurred less than 8 months into his presidency, after the embassy and Cole bombings.

Invaded the wrong country, well then just about every Democrat, who under Clinton stated that Sadam had WMD's gave him approval, not to mention it's hard to believe he'd send 150,000 troops over to prove he lied.

A balanced budget into record deficits. Yes Bush was a big spending republican, but that budget was balance BY NEWT and his republicans in Congress, who forced a shutdown to achieve it, and those 'record deficits' are not close to the ones Obama ran.

And finally the recession. Look to the Sub prime market that got that ball rolling.

The sub prime market was created by HUD secretary Democrat Mario Cuomo under Bill Clinton.


It's almost laughable the spin you and the media promoted at the time, when anyone who can check facts, would realize how ridiculous you people are. Too bad, too many or too lazy to do so.

And the same people (Obamabots) that created the mess are now creating a gigantic sub prime stock market bubble, a record expanding sub prime welfare state, destroying our military, and funding our enemies.

Congrats, your lies were successful.
Talk about laughable spin. No one does it better than a die hard Bush fan.

All of Bush's failures were someone else' fault, all of Clinton's successes were because of people who were focused on nothing but impeaching him and Obama created the mess he inherited.

Good one, Sarge.
 
You know why that is? Because of the graduated income tax that taxes high earners at a higher percentage. And that's what happens when you raise taxes on the rich.

That's why those that are for increasing taxes on the rich are screwing themselves if they live in blue states

Why? since the blue states have the highest costs of living, the people there have to make more money even simply to pay the basics. So it's simple math that states that under the graduated income tax, states with a higher percentage of higher income earners will have a higher tax liability.

And you actually proved my point about Liberals staying in their zone of High taxes. Please stay there and don't come down here and raise my cost of living and my taxes so that I too have a higher tax liability.

Bwahahahahaha.
Blah blah blah....the blue states giveth, the red states taketh away while whining about it.
 
Blah blah blah....the blue states giveth, the red states taketh away while whining about it.

Fine, keep raising taxes on the Rich. You are simply sending more money from the Blue states to DC, which then sends it to us.

That means there is less money in the Blue state to pay state taxes, to be spent on goods and services and to create jobs. And there is more money in my state to keep taxes low, and create jobs which, don't have to pay as much as they do in blue states to enjoy the same or better quality of life.

Here in my little piece 6 acre of heaven in the Blue Ridge Mountains in East Tennessee I can live twice as well on half as much as it takes in New York or California, or even, to some extent, Illinois, where I came from in '93. My property taxes on 6 acres with a 3,000 square foot Log house are less than Nine hundred bucks a year, I've got cheap electricity from the TVA, Car tags are $24 and the beauty of the Mountains is free I can buy a firearm in less than a 15 minute transaction, and I can shoot it on my own property on the range I built.


Thank you stupid liberals; you are free to visit but please don't move here and wreck it. I love it and want to stay free and keep my money in my pocket.
 
Last edited:
Talk about laughable spin. No one does it better than a die hard Bush fan.

All of Bush's failures were someone else' fault, all of Clinton's successes were because of people who were focused on nothing but impeaching him and Obama created the mess he inherited.

Good one, Sarge.
I'm no big Bush fan, he's a liberal Republican after all, but I'd take him in a heartbeat over what we've got now.

And the points I made are factually correct. Cuomo started the sub prime market, numerous Democrats made statements stating Saddam's WMD's posed a serious threat when Clinton was president. And the embassy and Cole bombings conducted by al Qaida were not addressed by Clinton, ultimately resulting in 9-11.

Kind of like Benghazi, which is going to ultimately bite us in the rear.
 
A lot of those Red "states" are real hell holes...Nebraska-Kansas-Oklahoma etc...I wouldn't want to go there at anytime...Fvck those places
 
Back
Top