Yeah, and we're paying the price for it.
Especially when you figure a lot of those "blue" states have republican governors. That's exactly where Obama concentrated his voter fraud operation. states like Ohio had more voters than were registered.your map and his are not all that different, Craig. I'm just sayin.
your map and his are not all that different, Craig. I'm just sayin.
Especially when you figure a lot of those "blue" states have republican governors. That's exactly where Obama concentrated his voter fraud operation. states like Ohio had more voters than were registered.
Actually, it is. Re-electing the guy who allowed 9/11, invaded the wrong country in response and turned a balanced budget into record deficits and a recession might be a better example of American stupidity.Yeah, and we're paying the price for it.
Not a real good reflection on the intelligence of the American Citizen.
You'll believe anything that extrudes out the butthole of the echo chamber.Especially when you figure a lot of those "blue" states have republican governors. That's exactly where Obama concentrated his voter fraud operation. states like Ohio had more voters than were registered.
states like Ohio had more voters than were registered.
Nonsense.
Really? Talk is cheap
"It has become blatantly obvious the voter fraud that was committed during the 2012 Presidential elections. In one county alone in Ohio, which was a battleground state, President Obama received 106,258 votes. But there were only 98,213 eligible voters. It's not humanly possible to get 108 percent of the vote!"
An analysis by The Columbus Dispatch in September found that more than one out of every five registered Ohio voters is probably ineligible to vote.
Politifact tries to spin it, but fails to anyone who can read between the lines.
http://www.politifact.com/ohio/stat...-petition-claims-obama-got-more-votes-one-co/
Really? Talk is cheap
"It has become blatantly obvious the voter fraud that was committed during the 2012 Presidential elections. In one county alone in Ohio, which was a battleground state, President Obama received 106,258 votes. But there were only 98,213 eligible voters. It's not humanly possible to get 108 percent of the vote!"
An analysis by The Columbus Dispatch in September found that more than one out of every five registered Ohio voters is probably ineligible to vote.
Politifact tries to spin it, but fails to anyone who can read between the lines.
http://www.politifact.com/ohio/stat...-petition-claims-obama-got-more-votes-one-co/
Actually, it is. Re-electing the guy who allowed 9/11, invaded the wrong country in response and turned a balanced budget into record deficits and a recession might be a better example of American stupidity.
You know why that is? Because of the graduated income tax that taxes high earners at a higher percentage. And that's what happens when you raise taxes on the rich.Reality check:
![]()
Talk about laughable spin. No one does it better than a die hard Bush fan.BWAHAHAHAHA, "Allowed 9/11?" That operation occurred less than 8 months into his presidency, after the embassy and Cole bombings.
Invaded the wrong country, well then just about every Democrat, who under Clinton stated that Sadam had WMD's gave him approval, not to mention it's hard to believe he'd send 150,000 troops over to prove he lied.
A balanced budget into record deficits. Yes Bush was a big spending republican, but that budget was balance BY NEWT and his republicans in Congress, who forced a shutdown to achieve it, and those 'record deficits' are not close to the ones Obama ran.
And finally the recession. Look to the Sub prime market that got that ball rolling.
The sub prime market was created by HUD secretary Democrat Mario Cuomo under Bill Clinton.
It's almost laughable the spin you and the media promoted at the time, when anyone who can check facts, would realize how ridiculous you people are. Too bad, too many or too lazy to do so.
And the same people (Obamabots) that created the mess are now creating a gigantic sub prime stock market bubble, a record expanding sub prime welfare state, destroying our military, and funding our enemies.
Congrats, your lies were successful.
Blah blah blah....the blue states giveth, the red states taketh away while whining about it.You know why that is? Because of the graduated income tax that taxes high earners at a higher percentage. And that's what happens when you raise taxes on the rich.
That's why those that are for increasing taxes on the rich are screwing themselves if they live in blue states
Why? since the blue states have the highest costs of living, the people there have to make more money even simply to pay the basics. So it's simple math that states that under the graduated income tax, states with a higher percentage of higher income earners will have a higher tax liability.
And you actually proved my point about Liberals staying in their zone of High taxes. Please stay there and don't come down here and raise my cost of living and my taxes so that I too have a higher tax liability.
Bwahahahahaha.
Blah blah blah....the blue states giveth, the red states taketh away while whining about it.
I'm no big Bush fan, he's a liberal Republican after all, but I'd take him in a heartbeat over what we've got now.Talk about laughable spin. No one does it better than a die hard Bush fan.
All of Bush's failures were someone else' fault, all of Clinton's successes were because of people who were focused on nothing but impeaching him and Obama created the mess he inherited.
Good one, Sarge.