New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Quick Update

justoffal said:
We've known each other for a good ten years and over several forums....
I have always had words of praise for your contributions but found that dealing with you on a one to one basis was certainly much less than self indulgent.
Your Avatar says it all about you....you really do see yourself as descending from on high and follow the typical lefty mantra of no retreat, no admission, no apologies. I have enjoyed reading your stuff nonetheless.

Frankly I find this particular post rather disingenuous. If you reason for being here was self indulgent....what exactly has changed and why do you feel the need to explain? Curious really.

As far a PJ being a poor target I totally disagree. PJ is probably one of the best places on the web to try out a political hack line to see what it might stir up in the way of a sample reaction from the other side.

There is no doubt in my mind that the constant level of droning at the pace and sophistication that has been generated on this board over the past two years is not privately sourced. I have noted more than once prosaic simile that screams " SAME AUTHOR WITH A DIFFERENT MONIKER " specifically on this sub-forum. I took it to mean that I was posting in the presence of professionals who do propaganda and spin for a living.

Good luck with the progressive Agenda...say hi to your supervisor for me will you?

JO
Click to expand...
I checked through my old Fray material and found some personal e-mail exchanges I had with Arkady in 2002. They were congenial on both our parts but accomplished nothing. He is no less stubborn than am I and just as convinced as I am of the correctness of the individual opinions we shared. We both came away from the experience thoroughly convinced, I'm sure, that the other one was touched in the head.
 
He sure made a Quick Exit

Hopefully the John Deere Street Cleaner didn't get him:


upload_2016-11-18_19-37-14.png☻
 
Have you ever noticed how these "higher beings" who feel compelled to tout their IQs always seem to have a dead on 160, never a 157 or maybe a 161?
 
ya-ta-hey said:
Mr. Bitter,

Wow, all that blather, and you still haven't addressed the original point.

You liberals do love your non sequiturs, wot?
Click to expand...

I seem to remember this liberal kicked you in the pants rather emphatically at least once, so I'll do it again for sure.

Perhaps some day you'll get the message, or maybe not
 
BitterPill said:
I seem to remember this liberal kicked you in the pants rather emphatically at least once, so I'll do it again for sure.

Perhaps some day you'll get the message, or maybe not
Click to expand...

Mr. Bitter,

Wow, with all that pretend "I won and you didn't," you still haven't addressed the original point."

You liberals sure love your faux victories, wot?
 
Quicker Update
upload_2016-12-1_20-2-10.pngstranger when you were here 24/7 before election and dust in the wind since.........she cut your paycheck off?
 
ya-ta-hey said:
Mr. Bitter,

Wow, with all that pretend "I won and you didn't," you still haven't addressed the original point."

You liberals sure love your faux victories, wot?
Click to expand...

Your point is you weren't criticizing Pelosi's looks.

This is basically as it happened: You criticized Pelosi's looks; I called you on it; you said you did not; I said you did; you claimed it was just a metaphor; I showed it was not a metaphor rather emphatically, and then I did my dance.

I am sorry about the dance. That was uncalled for, and I'm not going to do it again.

Other than that, I'm not interested in continuing this discussion.
 
Last edited:
BitterPill said:
Your point is you weren't criticizing Pelosi's looks.

This is basically as it happened: You criticized Pelosi's looks; I called you on it; you said you did not; I said you did; you claimed it was just a metaphor; I showed it was not a metaphor rather emphatically, and then I did my dance.

I am sorry about the dance. That was uncalled for, and I'm not going to do it again.

Other than that, I'm not interested in continuing this discussion.
Click to expand...

Well, you got to admit, on a scale of 1 to 10 for looks, she doesn't even register!
I'm just glad dem/libs haven't learned anything since 2010 and just keep on doing the same insanity of electing her as minority leader.............ya'll surely must enjoy losing?

Good to see ya back, I knew you were addicted☻
 
BitterPill said:
Your point is you weren't criticizing Pelosi's looks.

This is basically as it happened: You criticized Pelosi's looks; I called you on it; you said you did not; I said you did; you claimed it was just a metaphor; I showed it was not a metaphor rather emphatically, and then I did my dance.

I am sorry about the dance. That was uncalled for, and I'm not going to do it again.

Other than that, I'm not interested in continuing this discussion.
Click to expand...

Mr. pill,

Exactly, my point had nothing to do with Pelosi's looks.

Finally, you get it. Now, if you'd like to address my point, have at it.
 
Dawg said:
Well, you got to admit, on a scale of 1 to 10 for looks, she doesn't even register!
I'm just glad dem/libs haven't learned anything since 2010 and just keep on doing the same insanity of electing her as minority leader.............ya'll surely must enjoy losing?

Good to see ya back, I knew you were addicted☻
Click to expand...

Mr. Dawg,

Did you see the latest picture after she was reelected as house MINORITY leader?

Damn, her mouth goes from ear to ear now. Nancy, a clue, too many face lifts!
 
Wolfert Webber said:
Have you ever noticed how these "higher beings" who feel compelled to tout their IQs always seem to have a dead on 160, never a 157 or maybe a 161?
Click to expand...

I think I might know where he came up with that figure (19 seconds):

 
BitterPill said:
I seem to remember this liberal kicked you in the pants rather emphatically at least once, so I'll do it again for sure.

Perhaps some day you'll get the message, or maybe not
Click to expand...

It wasn't your shoe that did the kicking?????
 
marvin martian said:
He had the worst case of butthurt I've ever seen.
Click to expand...
I recall, on the Fray, when Bush beat Lurch in 2004, one Liberal dipshit got the mods to let them create a new board for all of them to hang out so they wouldn't have to deal with the Conservative posters rubbing it in their faces on the regular boards. It was the 2004 version of the safe space.
 
marvin martian said:
He had the worst case of butthurt I've ever seen.
Click to expand...

Well Arkady had, in his typical omniscient way, posted a long series of analytical works that substantiated the polling numbers showing Clinton in a landslide victory. He was very matter of fact and fatherly about it...offering Elder-like counsel for those who saw fit to question the veracity of the standard polls. For the life of me I don't know why anyone would take that kind of chance unless one was so supremely convinced of one's own super-infallible-intellect as to move forward with both ease and confidence when making an absolutist statement or taking an absolutist position. When the Polls didn't make it all the way to the finish line....all of his work was then instantly turned to whale pucky. Not sure how he could continue to condescend in the face of that kind of catastrophic failure, though if anyone could make lemonade out of rotten lemons is was Ole Ark....However we're talking career ending embarrassment here.


JO
 
Last edited:
Dawg said:
Quicker Update
View attachment 33746str

anger when you were here 24/7 before election and dust in the wind since.........she cut your paycheck off?
Click to expand...

upload_2016-12-1_20-2-10-png.33746

If I were pressed to put words to this pictorial..it would be

" Get those Goddamned rape victims out of my audience now! "
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top