Quick Update

[Dawg]

If I were pressed to put words to this pictorial..it would be

" Get those Goddamned rape victims out of my audience now! "

I can hear her saying exactly that..........

 

[BitterPill]

Mr. pill,

Exactly, my point had nothing to do with Pelosi's looks.

Finally, you get it. Now, if you'd like to address my point, have at it.

This is your point that I am addressing:

You don't think they keep Nancy as the House Democratic leader because of her looks, do you?​

and I ask why you are interested in criticizing a person's looks?

It is a fallacy.

Perhaps you don't know what a fallacy is. I mean, you didn't know what a metaphor is even though you practically read the definition for me:

https://web.cn.edu/kwheeler/fallacies_list.html

 

[JackDallas]

Well Arkady had, in his typical omniscient way, posted a long series of analytical works that substantiated the polling numbers showing Clinton in a landslide victory. He was very matter of fact and fatherly about it...offering Elder-like counsel for those who saw fit to question the veracity of the standard polls. For the life of me I don't know why anyone would take that kind of chance unless one was so supremely convinced of one's own super-infallible-intellect as to move forward with both ease and confidence when making an absolutist statement or taking an absolutist position. When the Polls didn't make it all the way to the finish line....all of his work was then instantly turned to whale pucky. Not sure how he could continue to condescend in the face of that kind of catastrophic failure, though if anyone could make lemonade out of rotten lemons is was Ole Ark....However we're talking career ending embarrassment here.


JO

You have to do what I did when Obama won in 2012 and I was convinced that, with his first term a cataclysmic failure, there was no way in hell he could win reelection. I said I was wrong. The world is upside down. Nothing made sense and we learned a lot about the Democrat voter, as we have continued to learn in the '16 election. It is this:
They don't care if their candidate is flawed; they don't care if he's a f**k-up of biblical proportions (which Obama was, and is); they don't care if she's a liar, a thief, a traitor, and/or a criminal (which Hillary Clinton is).
But this time they lost and they were not prepared to lose. We have to keep in mind that these people (although they call themselves Americans, and some call themselves Christians) support a political ideology that advocates for burning their own country's flag; mocking God; and murdering unborn babies. This sort of human being is not made of the kind of stuff that helps one overcome adversity and endure defeat, and move on.

 

[JackDallas]

This is your point that I am addressing:

You don't think they keep Nancy as the House Democratic leader because of her looks, do you?​

and I ask why you are interested in criticizing a person's looks?

It is a fallacy.

Perhaps you don't know what a fallacy is. I mean, you didn't know what a metaphor is even though you practically read the definition for me:

https://web.cn.edu/kwheeler/fallacies_list.html

I think this was a terrible mistake on the part of the House Democrats, but I am so glad they made it. Pelosi is certifiably insane and is the worst possible thing they could place in charge of their side in the lower house.
I read the game plan that her opponent, Tim Ryan, had to bring the Democrat Party back from its humiliating defeat, at the hands of Hillary Clinton. I have to ask the question: Have they taken leave of their senses? Well, yes, actually they have. Tim Ryan will eventually change parties and become a Republican.

 

[JackDallas]

good one -

to sum up, ark feels his PJ 'self indulgence' has a poor return on investment, after 4 years of failed schilling for Obama & Hillary. So he's packing up and starting all over at some site where his reputation is unknown.

He'd better change his name because someone is sure to recognize him and then all his subterfuge would be for naught.

 

[JackDallas]

I'm not happy to see him go, for sure. at least he (mostly composed) his own posts. Even if some of the economic ones were hilariously mistaken. At least he was an original thinker rather than a cut and paste bot. That said, he seems to lack any significant real world understanding of the private sector and concerns of working families.

I'm not happy to see him go either. There is nothing more fun than making fun of pompous asses, and Ark, is one of the most pompous of the pompous.

 

[justoffal]

He'd better change his name because someone is sure to recognize him and then all his subterfuge would be for naught.

An ego like that cannot be hidden beneath a dirigible somebody will recognize his writing style. In any case I expect that he is still here using a different moniker...

Ark is something of an elemental...rich indeed was his Quixotic departure to places where less intelligent beings may yet indeed be enlightened.....

Onward with no regrets and no look-backs Sancho!!

 

[JackDallas]

I deliberately try to dodge posts with a simple link, and one line snark accompanying.

PJ isn't the worst in that regard. The "politics forums" is the Valhalla of the naked link, actually. And yes, they are overwhelmingly extreme right wing.

I visited that place for a short while. There was no one to argue with. It bored me to tears. I longed for some whackos to contend with. That's why I'm here. If you are really BA, be careful or you'll scare them all off and then where will we be?

 

[justoffal]

Yes as I recall Mz. Pelosi was the major architect of the 1924 defeat also.

 

[Dawg]

This is your point that I am addressing:

You don't think they keep Nancy as the House Democratic leader because of her looks, do you?​

and I ask why you are interested in criticizing a person's looks?

It is a fallacy.

Perhaps you don't know what a fallacy is. I mean, you didn't know what a metaphor is even though you practically read the definition for me:

https://web.cn.edu/kwheeler/fallacies_list.html

it's not criticizing when it's fact

 

[Dawg]

He'd better change his name because someone is sure to recognize him and then all his subterfuge would be for naught.

He can change his name, he can't change his posting format

 

[JackDallas]

This is your point that I am addressing:

You don't think they keep Nancy as the House Democratic leader because of her looks, do you?​

and I ask why you are interested in criticizing a person's looks?

It is a fallacy.

Perhaps you don't know what a fallacy is. I mean, you didn't know what a metaphor is even though you practically read the definition for me:

https://web.cn.edu/kwheeler/fallacies_list.html

You're not suggesting that Nancy Pelosi is not ugly are you?

 

[BitterPill]

I think this was a terrible mistake on the part of the House Democrats, but I am so glad they made it. Pelosi is certifiably insane and is the worst possible thing they could place in charge of their side in the lower house.
I read the game plan that her opponent, Tim Ryan, had to bring the Democrat Party back from its humiliating defeat, at the hands of Hillary Clinton. I have to ask the question: Have they taken leave of their senses? Well, yes, actually they have. Tim Ryan will eventually change parties and become a Republican.

If Tim Ryan is going to change parties and become a 'Republican' - or alt-right, white-nationalist party - so be it. It's better that way.

I'm not a big fan of Pelosi's, either, but she is what she is, and she's good at it.

 

[BitterPill]

You're not suggesting that Nancy Pelosi is not ugly are you?

Pay attention, Jack.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

You have to do what I did when Obama won in 2012 and I was convinced that, with his first term a cataclysmic failure, there was no way in hell he could win reelection. I said I was wrong. The world is upside down. Nothing made sense and we learned a lot about the Democrat voter, as we have continued to learn in the '16 election. It is this:
They don't care if their candidate is flawed; they don't care if he's a f**k-up of biblical proportions (which Obama was, and is); they don't care if she's a liar, a thief, a traitor, and/or a criminal (which Hillary Clinton is).
But this time they lost and they were not prepared to lose. We have to keep in mind that these people (although they call themselves Americans, and some call themselves Christians) support a political ideology that advocates for burning their own country's flag; mocking God; and murdering unborn babies. This sort of human being is not made of the kind of stuff that helps one overcome adversity and endure defeat, and move on.

The near-tripling of the markets and record breaking monthly streaks of jobs growth and economic growth, our ascent from the GWB abyss, and no recessions starting under Obama being the "cataclysmic failure."

In GOP la-la land.

;-)

 

[JackDallas]

The near-tripling of the markets and record breaking monthly streaks of jobs growth and economic growth, our ascent from the GWB abyss, and no recessions starting under Obama being the "cataclysmic failure."

In GOP la-la land.

;-)

If you believe the lies and bullshit put out by the Obama administration then you belong with the poor dumb f**ks about whom I was talking in my post.

 

[JackDallas]

Pay attention, Jack.

I thought I was.

 

[JackDallas]

If Tim Ryan is going to change parties and become a 'Republican' - or alt-right, white-nationalist party - so be it. It's better that way.

I'm not a big fan of Pelosi's, either, but she is what she is, and she's good at it.

She lost the House for them and she makes the Party look like an MHMR center so I wouldn't say she's good at anything; but I am personally thankful the nutcase was reelected.
We have to pass the bill so we can find out what's in it. NP

 

[BitterPill]

An ego like that cannot be hidden beneath a dirigible somebody will recognize his writing style. In any case I expect that he is still here using a different moniker...

Ark is something of an elemental...rich indeed was his Quixotic departure to places where less intelligent beings may yet indeed be enlightened.....

Onward with no regrets and no look-backs Sancho!!

The irony.

 

[marvin martian]

The irony.

I remember the day a year or so ago when you learned what that word meant. It was precious...