New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Rand Paul plagiarizes Wikipedia - LOL

Rachel Madddow told all about it on her show last night.. Rand Paul has lifted script & plagiarized from Wikipedia for his speeches more than once..

~~~~
Poor Ken Cuccinelli can’t seem to get a break these days in his doomed race for governor of the state of Virginia. Voters don’t seem to like the GOP former front-runner’s stance on abortion, gay rights, or his support for the US government shutdown. Now, Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) may have driven the final nail into Cuccinelli’s political coffin this week with a speech that was supposed to energize the base. Alas, Rachel Maddow found out that the senator’s speech was stolen from a Wikipedia entry on the 1997 dystopian sci-fi flick, “Gattaca.” Seriously, we are not kidding.

Rachel Maddow Catches Rand Paul Plagiarizing Speech From ‘Gattaca’ And Wikipedia (VIDEO)
Gattaca.JPG
 
Rachel Maddow showed the clips of his speeches last night on her program.. Rand Paul's words were almost verbatim from the text on Wikipedia.. :rolleyes:
 
...plagiarism from a "doctor" who refuses to take the medical certification examine as required by the AMA for his graduating class on forward - surprised? Not so much...
 
This post stinks of desperation...anything to try to distract from the Obamacare train wreck in progress...LOL!

Martian Lad, you guys should really come up with a something fresher than "train wreck" ZZZZZZZZ.

But yes, we know... ANY subject other than "the train wreck that is Obamacare" will be viewed by you obsessive O-haters as a distraction.
 
Now he's challenging Rachel Maddow to a duel. He's a wussy.

Poor guy.. goes on to explain why he can't have a duel w/Rachel in an update.. :p
~~~~
Rand Paul: People Who Accuse Me Of Plagiarism Are ‘Hacks And Haters’
While MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow first broke the story on Monday night, additional allegations have come out this week. According to Buzzfeed author Andrew Kaczynski, an entire portion of Paul’s book, Government Bullies, was taken directly from a Heritage Foundation case study, and another Wikipedia page for the film ‘Stand and Deliver’ was quoted in an immigration speech.
On Stephanopolous’ show, Paul defended himself, arguing that he’s written “scientific papers” and knows how to quote sources. However, he admitted that he’s never footnoted thousands of his speeches, and went on to say that those accusing him, including Maddow, are “hacks and haters.”
“The spoken word shouldn’t be held to the same, sort-of, standard that you have if you’re giving a scientific paper.”
Update
Paul also said he would like to challenge Rachel Maddow and other critics to a duel “if dueling were legal in Kentucky, if they keep it up, you know, it would be a duel challenge. But I can’t do that, because I can’t hold office in Kentucky then.”
 
Poor guy.. goes on to explain why he can't have a duel w/Rachel in an update.. :p
~~~~
Rand Paul: People Who Accuse Me Of Plagiarism Are ‘Hacks And Haters’
While MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow first broke the story on Monday night, additional allegations have come out this week. According to Buzzfeed author Andrew Kaczynski, an entire portion of Paul’s book, Government Bullies, was taken directly from a Heritage Foundation case study, and another Wikipedia page for the film ‘Stand and Deliver’ was quoted in an immigration speech.
On Stephanopolous’ show, Paul defended himself, arguing that he’s written “scientific papers” and knows how to quote sources. However, he admitted that he’s never footnoted thousands of his speeches, and went on to say that those accusing him, including Maddow, are “hacks and haters.”
“The spoken word shouldn’t be held to the same, sort-of, standard that you have if you’re giving a scientific paper.”
Update
Paul also said he would like to challenge Rachel Maddow and other critics to a duel “if dueling were legal in Kentucky, if they keep it up, you know, it would be a duel challenge. But I can’t do that, because I can’t hold office in Kentucky then.”

I saw the interview and you are vilifying Paul by characterizing what transpired on his part as dishonorable and that he didn't rebut with a measure of humor (which you try to revamp as an actual, real challenge). I dislike those kind of tactics because they are an exercise in the manipulation of others by distorting reality and facts.
 
I saw the interview and you are vilifying Paul by characterizing what transpired on his part as dishonorable and that he didn't rebut with a measure of humor (which you try to revamp as an actual, real challenge). I dislike those kind of tactics because they are an exercise in the manipulation of others by distorting reality and facts.

Yeah right..who would actually believe there could ever be a duel.. Guess you didn't see the icon with tongue stuck out..
 
Back
Top