Rand Paul's PRE-taped response - LOL

[JuliefromOhio]

how did he do that? is he psycho psychic or what?

“Twelve years after we were attack by al-Qaeda, twelve years after 3,000 Americans were killed by al-Qaeda, President Obama now asks us to be allies with al-Qaeda,”

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/rand-paul-releases-pre-taped-response-to-obamas

 

[Colorforms]

how did he do that? is he psycho psychic or what?

“Twelve years after we were attack by al-Qaeda, twelve years after 3,000 Americans were killed by al-Qaeda, President Obama now asks us to be allies with al-Qaeda,”

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/rand-paul-releases-pre-taped-response-to-obamas

We're talking democrats, it was inevitable.

 

[Corruptbuddha]

how did he do that? is he psycho psychic or what?

“Twelve years after we were attack by al-Qaeda, twelve years after 3,000 Americans were killed by al-Qaeda, President Obama now asks us to be allies with al-Qaeda,”

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/rand-paul-releases-pre-taped-response-to-obamas

What you should be asking yourself is how Paul could have rebutted Obama so well never having hear his 'speech'.

Answer...Obama has nothing new to say...ever.

 

[JuliefromOhio]

What you should be asking yourself is how Paul could have rebutted Obama so well never having hear his 'speech'.

Answer...Obama has nothing new to say...ever.

Rand Paul had nothing to say about the actual content of Pres Obama's speech so billing this as a response was as phony as can be.
if I understand his isolationist stance, he doesn't want the USA to be #1 in anything. no more USA exceptionalism. it's funny the more I think about it because BY GAWD, that's what repubs insist we are and must be.
"hi, I'm Rand Paul and I'm running for president of the unexceptional USA."

 

[Corruptbuddha]

He mentioned every key point Obama made.

Did you even watch the video that YOU posted?

And isolationist does not equal non-interventionist.

Look it up before you make yourself look foolish.

 

[NightSwimmer]

He could have done it live -- if he knew how to read a teleprompter.

 

[Dawg]

Rand Paul had nothing to say about the actual content of Pres Obama's speech so billing this as a response was as phony as can be.
if I understand his isolationist stance, he doesn't want the USA to be #1 in anything. no more USA exceptionalism. it's funny the more I think about it because BY GAWD, that's what repubs insist we are and must be.
"hi, I'm Rand Paul and I'm running for president of the unexceptional USA."

only the deft/dumb didn't know what 'O' was going to say on the eve of 9/11.......'O' has removed America as being #1..........and world laughs at 'O' the clown

 

[Dawg]

He could have done it live -- if he knew how to read a teleprompter.

'O' has the teleprompter reading down pat........w/out it 'O' is all eh.eh.eh

 

[fairsheet]

The GOP has been overtly and consistently NON-isolationist, at least since WWII. Now, some seem to be fearing that Paul is in some sort of vanguard in terms of flipping the GOP to an isolationist posture. It'll never work....

The majority of GOPs AND the GOP establishment, remain non-isolationist. All Paul will do, is engender a further GOPian schism. It's all good. But....that raises the question of why the GOP even let Paul give his thing in the first place.

It's simple...the GOP establishment had no Obama-hate angle available to it in this instance so....."Any Obama-hate angle in a storm"!

 

[JuliefromOhio]

Rand Paul's pre-response was covered by Stephen Colbert. Paul's 4 different and conflicting positions are pointed out in a humorous way. enjoy the video at the link.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/09/...-incoherence-and-slumbering-wombat-hairstyle/

 

[Zoar]

Stephen Colbert capturedRand Paul perfectly!

 

[JuliefromOhio]

Stephen Colbert capturedRand Paul perfectly!

“So, just to recap,” Colbert concluded, “Rand Paul says
(1) no diplomacy, but
(2) we can’t do nothing, but
(3) no to the president’s plan and
(4) no to regime change.”

 

[Colorforms]

“So, just to recap,” Colbert concluded, “Rand Paul says
(1) no diplomacy, but
(2) we can’t do nothing, but
(3) no to the president’s plan and
(4) no to regime change.”

I agree with that. We shouldn't have gotten involved in the first place.

 

[GordonGecko]

I agree with that. We shouldn't have gotten involved in the first place.

No surprise you agree with contradiction and gobbledegook from a Republican.

 

[GordonGecko]

“So, just to recap,” Colbert concluded, “Rand Paul says
(1) no diplomacy, but
(2) we can’t do nothing, but
(3) no to the president’s plan and
(4) no to regime change.”

Rand opposes a war which he would support, in favor of supporting a war which he opposes.

 

[JuliefromOhio]

I agree with that. We shouldn't have gotten involved in the first place.

Rand Paul made 4 conflicting statements. if you think you agree with all of them, your brain is mush.

 

[Colorforms]

Rand Paul made 4 conflicting statements. if you think you agree with all of them, your brain is mush.

None of the statements are conflicting. Doing nothing satisfies all of the criteria.

 

[Craig]

None of the statements are conflicting. Doing nothing satisfies all of the criteria.

Sigh...

(2) we can’t do nothing, but

 

[Colorforms]

Sigh...

(2) we can’t do nothing, but

We can do nothing

 

[Craig]

We can do nothing

So...you do not agree with all the statements.

Lordy...get some coffee.