New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Remember these words…Griswold v. Connecticut

Bugsy McGurk

President
That’s the SCOTUS case confirming that there is a constitutional right of privacy forbidding the government from dictating what kind of birth control people can, and cannot, use.

It’s the same right to privacy invoked by the SCOTUS when deciding Roe v. Wade. If Roe is struck down by the right wing activists on the SCOTUS because they say there is no such right to privacy, there’s no reason why Griswold should not also be struck down. Same with a list of other opinions keeping the government out of peoples’ private lives….


Want a country where SCOTUS activists can decide that the government can regulate your private life? Then root for Roe to fall.
 
That’s the SCOTUS case confirming that there is a constitutional right of privacy forbidding the government from dictating what kind of birth control people can, and cannot, use.

It’s the same right to privacy invoked by the SCOTUS when deciding Roe v. Wade. If Roe is struck down by the right wing activists on the SCOTUS because they say there is no such right to privacy, there’s no reason why Griswold should not also be struck down. Same with a list of other opinions keeping the government out of peoples’ private lives….


Want a country where SCOTUS activists can decide that the government can regulate your private life? Then root for Roe to fall.
It puts Loving vs Virginia and Lawrence vs Texas on the chopping block.

Meaning the state also get to decide who you get to marry and which sex acts permissible in your relationships.
 
Back
Top