Bugsy McGurk
President
That’s the SCOTUS case confirming that there is a constitutional right of privacy forbidding the government from dictating what kind of birth control people can, and cannot, use.
It’s the same right to privacy invoked by the SCOTUS when deciding Roe v. Wade. If Roe is struck down by the right wing activists on the SCOTUS because they say there is no such right to privacy, there’s no reason why Griswold should not also be struck down. Same with a list of other opinions keeping the government out of peoples’ private lives….
www.cnn.com
Want a country where SCOTUS activists can decide that the government can regulate your private life? Then root for Roe to fall.
It’s the same right to privacy invoked by the SCOTUS when deciding Roe v. Wade. If Roe is struck down by the right wing activists on the SCOTUS because they say there is no such right to privacy, there’s no reason why Griswold should not also be struck down. Same with a list of other opinions keeping the government out of peoples’ private lives….
It's impossible to wall off reversing Roe from landmark marriage and contraception rulings
Justice Samuel Alito, in his draft opinion that would overturn Roe v. Wade, tries to make clear it should not necessarily impact other decisions such as the right to marry a person of a different race or same sex and the right to contraception, which rely on some of the same threads of legal...
Want a country where SCOTUS activists can decide that the government can regulate your private life? Then root for Roe to fall.