Mytzlplk
Governor
which makes him wrong about just about everything historically and in the present, which is why he has few choices left but to lie with high and unprecedented frequency. http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/...iar-Why-don-t-our-guardians-of-discourse-care I've long agreed with author there -- it's baffling why an alleged "liberal" media isn't hammering his candidacy into oblivion over his lying, which would serve as an indictment for and perhaps provide and answer to, the question as to why rightwingers have granted an open-ended license for their pols and pundits to shamelessly lie without fear of reprisal as the good xtians they claim to be. http://ecclesia.org/truth/lying.html
As we all know, rightwingers are proud of themselves, whether it be over being on the wrong side of history and sacrificing chicken sales for biblical principles they largely pick and choose to the exclusion of many others, or being inept and deceptive "morans" that replaced the 9th Commandment with "Let them die/eat dirt!" mandate.
Is the reason so many rightwing xtians are supporting the Mutt because his religion once championed the traditional marriage found in the old Testament?
Or is it because he like them, is a stumble-bumbling hypocrite who is far removed from a champion of the New Testament?
The funny part about this is, the Mutt got kicked like a cur by the Brit press because he was honest and being who and what he is when he ain't a lying POS. Compare and contrast what the Brits did over his honesty to what he gets here at home for his unending dishonesty.
The so-called "liberal" media should be giving him the same treatment those interested in gay rights are giving the chickenguy, because after all, lies and liars are what the so-called quasi-constitutional fourth branch/media watchdogs are supposed to be attacking, no? And even if they were so inclined, the Mutt has a fix for that too -- reneging on his worthless word. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...tocol/2012/07/28/gJQAAaeVGX_blog.html?hpid=z1 He should be admired ONLY by those who love and support pathological liars, and think that it is not only not a disqualifier for the top job, but a also requirement.
How else are they/he gonna win, no?
"c" y'all
As we all know, rightwingers are proud of themselves, whether it be over being on the wrong side of history and sacrificing chicken sales for biblical principles they largely pick and choose to the exclusion of many others, or being inept and deceptive "morans" that replaced the 9th Commandment with "Let them die/eat dirt!" mandate.
Is the reason so many rightwing xtians are supporting the Mutt because his religion once championed the traditional marriage found in the old Testament?
Or is it because he like them, is a stumble-bumbling hypocrite who is far removed from a champion of the New Testament?
Mitt Romney’s not-so-excellent adventure abroad (“Romneyshambles,” the Brits are calling it) has been many things: shabby, hilarious, scandalous, an enlivening hoot to a dreary election season. One thing it shouldn’t be, though, is surprising.
Charles Krauthammer, the right-wing commentator who usually finds every excuse to attack Barack Obama—he took Obama’s blinking during a tête-à-tête with Vladimir Putin as a sign of appeasement—pronounced himself befuddled by the GOP candidate’s flare of incompetence.
These sorts of trips, Krauthammer said on Fox News Thursday night, are easy. You express solidarity with the allies, listen, nod your head, and say nice things or nothing at all. Instead, Romney questioned his hosts’ ability to run the Olympics, raised doubts about Londoners’ community spirit, and violated protocol by publicly mentioning a meeting with the head of MI-6. “It’s unbelievable, it’s beyond human understanding, it’s incomprehensible,” Krauthammer, normally a paragon of self-confidence, sputtered. “I’m out of adjectives … I don’t get it.”
The thing that Krauthammer doesn’t get is that Romney is not the sort of businessman—that his brand of capitalism is not the sort of enterprise—that requires even the most elementary understanding of diplomacy, courtesy, or sensitivity to other people’s values, lives, or perceptions.
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...his_worldview_.html?google_editors_picks=trueCharles Krauthammer, the right-wing commentator who usually finds every excuse to attack Barack Obama—he took Obama’s blinking during a tête-à-tête with Vladimir Putin as a sign of appeasement—pronounced himself befuddled by the GOP candidate’s flare of incompetence.
These sorts of trips, Krauthammer said on Fox News Thursday night, are easy. You express solidarity with the allies, listen, nod your head, and say nice things or nothing at all. Instead, Romney questioned his hosts’ ability to run the Olympics, raised doubts about Londoners’ community spirit, and violated protocol by publicly mentioning a meeting with the head of MI-6. “It’s unbelievable, it’s beyond human understanding, it’s incomprehensible,” Krauthammer, normally a paragon of self-confidence, sputtered. “I’m out of adjectives … I don’t get it.”
The thing that Krauthammer doesn’t get is that Romney is not the sort of businessman—that his brand of capitalism is not the sort of enterprise—that requires even the most elementary understanding of diplomacy, courtesy, or sensitivity to other people’s values, lives, or perceptions.
The funny part about this is, the Mutt got kicked like a cur by the Brit press because he was honest and being who and what he is when he ain't a lying POS. Compare and contrast what the Brits did over his honesty to what he gets here at home for his unending dishonesty.
The so-called "liberal" media should be giving him the same treatment those interested in gay rights are giving the chickenguy, because after all, lies and liars are what the so-called quasi-constitutional fourth branch/media watchdogs are supposed to be attacking, no? And even if they were so inclined, the Mutt has a fix for that too -- reneging on his worthless word. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...tocol/2012/07/28/gJQAAaeVGX_blog.html?hpid=z1 He should be admired ONLY by those who love and support pathological liars, and think that it is not only not a disqualifier for the top job, but a also requirement.
How else are they/he gonna win, no?
"c" y'all
