Rush Limbaugh may leave Cumulus radio

[LeRoy_Was_Here]

Wow.. a bunch of high class individuals in here, with no emotional biases either...

I sure hope you don't expect anyone to take anything you say with any sort of seriousness.

Do you think Rush Limbaugh is a "high class individual"?

 

[as seen on tv]

because he's being blamed for their loss of revenue. HA HA

"According to the source, Limbaugh is considering the move because Cumulus CEO Lew Dickey has blamed the company's advertising losses on Limbaugh's controversial remarks about Sandra Fluke, the Georgetown law student. In Feb. 2012, Limbaugh referred to Fluke as "a <img src=images/smilies/animated/censored.gif>" because she had called on congress to mandate insurance coverage of birth control. The subsequent controversy over those remarks resulted in a significant advertising boycott.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2013/05/rush-limbaugh-may-leave-cumulus-163282.html

i'm always astonished at how EVERY post on limbaugh is posted by someone from the left. This is probably the revenue problem - the rest of the nation ignores him, and his audience consists of left wing extremists seeking something to be outraged over.

 

[LeRoy_Was_Here]

It is their obsession (at least, a few on the left. Not the smarter ones). The proof is here.

We can always expect Zam-Zam to show up on any thread discussing either Rush Limbaugh or Sarah Palin. SOMEBODY'S gotta defend them, apparently, and Zam-Zam does so like a bulldog.

 

[Zam-Zam]

What do you expect? Rush Limbaugh is the titular leader of the Republican Party.

Why? Because you say so?

 

[Zam-Zam]

We can always expect Zam-Zam to show up on any thread discussing either Rush Limbaugh or Sarah Palin. SOMEBODY'S gotta defend them, apparently, and Zam-Zam does so like a bulldog.

Except that I haven't defended (nor condemned) them. Thus, your only argument falls apart like a paper bag in a rainstorm.

 

[Zam-Zam]

i'm always astonished at how EVERY post on limbaugh is posted by someone from the left. This is probably the revenue problem - the rest of the nation ignores him, and his audience consists of left wing extremists seeking something to be outraged over.

That sums it up nicely.

 

[LeRoy_Was_Here]

That sums it up nicely.

No, it was stupid. If every post on Limbaugh is from someone on the left, then WHAT are you and ASOT doing here?????????

 

[NightSwimmer]

Why? Because you say so?

Of course not. I'm not even a Republican. It is the Republican base who has chosen to follow Rush. I'm merely an observer of this phenomenon.

 

[Zam-Zam]

Of course not. I'm not even a Republican. It is the Republican base who has chosen to follow Rush. I'm merely an observer of this phenomenon.

can you prove what you say? Or do you just say it?

 

[LeRoy_Was_Here]

No...what made her a sl u t is wanting us to pay for HER birth control. However, to keep that skag from breeding, I'll volunteer to foot the bill myself.

Simply false. Sandra Fluke did NOT want 'us' to pay for her birth control. She wanted her health insurance to cover it; which would have been paid for by Georgetown student dues. NOT 'us'.

Try to get your facts straight before posting; it will save you embarrassment.

 

[Zam-Zam]

No, it was stupid. If every post on Limbaugh is from someone on the left, then WHAT are you and ASOT doing here?????????

We're replying to posts. See who made the original post. That's what we're saying, and you know it's true.

 

[GordonGecko]

Ever notice that almost every post about "Rush Limbaugh" come from the left? It's as if they hang on his every word.

Really? You think we don't have ditto-heads who post stories they hear from Rush here as TPs???

 

[LeRoy_Was_Here]

Except that I haven't defended (nor condemned) them. Thus, your only argument falls apart like a paper bag in a rainstorm.

Why, of course you have. THIS was a 'defense' of Rush Limbaugh. It cannot be interpreted in any other way:

Zam-Zam: Seems...odd. As Limbaugh has been and is still the most listened to talk show host alive.
http://www.talkers.com/top-talk-radio-audiences/

Who wants to bet he'll be on the air for years to come?

Love him or hate him...he's still number one.

 

[LeRoy_Was_Here]

Really? You think we don't have ditto-heads who post stories they hear from Rush here as TPs???

Yes, but those are all 'unattributed'. In Republican minds, that doesn't count.

 

[LeRoy_Was_Here]

We're replying to posts. See who made the original post. That's what we're saying, and you know it's true.

You didn't say 'every top-post'. You said 'every post'. See the difference?

 

[GordonGecko]

Basic fact....Rush's audience is getting OLD, very old. And he's too much of a Party hack to predict the end of the world (as Glenn Beck does), so he doesn't get the "panic money" from sponsors like Goldline, Food Insurance, Liberty Safes, etc.

And Geritol and Depends and supplemental Medicare insurance ad buys don't pay for all the alimony he has to fork out. :smile:

 

[GordonGecko]

Yes, but those are all 'unattributed'. In Republican minds, that doesn't count.

I saw Drumcollie post a TP on a story that Rush had spoken on just five minutes earlier.

But notice Zam's attempt to create the image that "Nobody on the Right talks about Rush"....why is that? Are they EMBARASSED about listening to him??? :smile:

 

[Zam-Zam]

Why, of course you have. THIS was a 'defense' of Rush Limbaugh. It cannot be interpreted in any other way:

Zam-Zam: Seems...odd. As Limbaugh has been and is still the most listened to talk show host alive.
http://www.talkers.com/top-talk-radio-audiences/

Who wants to bet he'll be on the air for years to come?

Love him or hate him...he's still number one.

Except I didn't make that post. Go back and look for yourself.



Once again, Leroy,.....paper bag, rainstorm.

 

[NightSwimmer]

can you prove what you say? Or do you just say it?

I feel no need to "prove" such an obvious observation. If it bothers you, then perhaps you should attempt to disprove it. Good luck with that.

 

[Zam-Zam]

You didn't say 'every top-post'. You said 'every post'. See the difference?

Mea Culpa. That's your point. You win.


You still, however, have attributed a post to me that I didn't make. I'm sure you will be gracious enough to acknowledge that.