New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Secure servers.

PhilFish

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
Is the precedent now set that anything stored in secure servers by an administration must be due to nefarious behavior?
 
PhilFish said:
Is the precedent now set that anything stored in secure servers by an administration must be due to nefarious behavior?
Click to expand...

By using this top security server, it was an instant red flag re: the Trump Ukraine call. These type of calls aren't usually placed there according to someone who has worked in the W.H.
_____________________

I helped classify calls for two presidents. The White House abuse of the system is alarming.
Moving a conversation to the ‘code word’ server can be justified only by national security concerns
By Kelly Magsamen

Kelly Magsamen is a former National Security Council staff member, as well as a former senior Pentagon official. She is currently the vice president for national security and international policy at the Center for American Progress.
September 29, 2019 at 12:01 p.m. CDT

The whistleblower at the heart of the Ukraine controversy said White House officials ordered information about President Trump’s phone call with President Volodymyr Zelensky to be removed from the classified server typically used to store such information and placed on a hyper-secure “code word” server. Such special protections are typically reserved for material of the gravest sensitivity: detailed information about covert operations, for example, where exposure can get people killed.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outl...sidents-white-house-abuse-system-is-alarming/
 
Addy said:
By using this top security server, it was an instant red flag re: the Trump Ukraine call. These type of calls aren't usually placed there according to someone who has worked in the W.H.
_____________________

I helped classify calls for two presidents. The White House abuse of the system is alarming.
Moving a conversation to the ‘code word’ server can be justified only by national security concerns
By Kelly Magsamen

Kelly Magsamen is a former National Security Council staff member, as well as a former senior Pentagon official. She is currently the vice president for national security and international policy at the Center for American Progress.
September 29, 2019 at 12:01 p.m. CDT

The whistleblower at the heart of the Ukraine controversy said White House officials ordered information about President Trump’s phone call with President Volodymyr Zelensky to be removed from the classified server typically used to store such information and placed on a hyper-secure “code word” server. Such special protections are typically reserved for material of the gravest sensitivity: detailed information about covert operations, for example, where exposure can get people killed.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outl...sidents-white-house-abuse-system-is-alarming/
Click to expand...


No rule prohibits putting a file with a lower-level classification into the NICE system in order to take advantage of its greater access restrictions, a former official said.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/01/us/politics/white-house-classified-computer-system.html
 
ObamacareForever said:
No, only when they are used to cover up nefarious behavior.
Click to expand...

Reading further the former W.H employee stated also:

If the president had only been asking Zelensky to root out corruption, as a general matter, as he has claimed, that would be standard fare for a presidential phone call, meriting a “secret” designation.

The apparent abuse of the classification system offers reason enough for congressional review of the Ukraine conversation and the events surrounding it. The questions at hand are straightforward: What national security reason was offered for moving the record of the July 25 conversation (and possibly others) to the code word system? Which NSC lawyers made that decision? Was the national security adviser involved?
 
ObamacareForever said:
No, only when they are used to cover up nefarious behavior.
Click to expand...
Like stopping corrupt Dems from illegally leaking them to the press?

Only lefty commits crime and then cries that the tighter security restrictions needed to stop criminal lefty is actually a bigoted conspiracy against lefty.

Brain rot stinks.
 
Mick said:
Like stopping corrupt Dems from illegally leaking them to the press?

Only lefty commits crime and then cries that the tighter security restrictions needed to stop criminal lefty is actually a bigoted conspiracy against lefty.

Brain rot stinks.
Click to expand...
Nobody can make sense of this conspiracy theory. It's just some buzz words strung together.
 
Spamature said:
No, just when it becomes evidence in and of a reported crime, is all.
Click to expand...

what makes it evidence?


it's allowed to be stored there
there are no rules prohibiting it
a false classification was not applied to it
there are no hidden recordings
there is not official transcript...the doc provided is the closest thing to a transcript there is



?
 
PhilFish said:
what makes it evidence?


it's allowed to be stored there
there are no rules prohibiting it
a false classification was not applied to it
there are no hidden recordings
there is not official transcript...the doc provided is the closest thing to a transcript there is



?
Click to expand...
Because the contents of it were reported as a crime.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top