shame on GOP and the Supremes
- Thread starter JuliefromOhio
- Start date
Gramps
Mayor
Regardless of one's political affiliations they surely must see the honestly of those cartoons. There are spots where it would be easier to run for office than vote in elections. Gramps
NightSwimmer
Senator
Oh...
[video=youtube;HXGz8i0I2L0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=HXGz8i0I2L0[/video]
Never mind.
[video=youtube;HXGz8i0I2L0]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=HXGz8i0I2L0[/video]
Never mind.
these UN-democratic tricks are the only way they can win elections anymore.
as conservative Paul Weyrich advised repubs years ago, and I paraphrase....."we don't want everyone to vote. in fact, our leverage goes up when fewer vote...."
we'll hear this at Obama rallies.
[video=youtube;RHPx3RghAKw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHPx3RghAKw[/video]
[video=youtube;RHPx3RghAKw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHPx3RghAKw[/video]
Z
zzigzzag
Guest
Here in GA, the pub-controlled State government is attempting to gerrymander predominantly black districts out of existence.
tobaccoroad
Mayor
If they surveyed likely Obama voters it would be two out of three.
http://weaselzippers.us/2012/05/03/survey-one-in-three-americans-would-fail-us-citizenship-test/
http://weaselzippers.us/2012/05/03/survey-one-in-three-americans-would-fail-us-citizenship-test/
What's that?? Another piece of crap put out by right wing internet sites?? Or maybe another EMAIL SLIME like Blabs posted earlier.
Z
zzigzzag
Guest
Aaahhhh....an article from a wacky British tabloid (Daily Mail) owned by Rupert Murdock via a wingnut cult site. It's a story about a sample of 1000 people "over 18" (no other info) who were asked ten questions by god-knows-who.
That's just a hair's breadth from citing "facts" from The Onion....on the less credible side. Almost as bad as FOX.
Let's see.... what else is in there?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/index.html
Hmmmm....I notice they don't have an entire section called "LeftMinds". Wonder what's up with that.
When you're resorting to sources like that, do you ever ask yourself why you have to "scour the bowels of the internet"? Could it be that you're looking for sh-t?
That's just a hair's breadth from citing "facts" from The Onion....on the less credible side. Almost as bad as FOX.
Let's see.... what else is in there?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/index.html
Hmmmm....I notice they don't have an entire section called "LeftMinds". Wonder what's up with that.
When you're resorting to sources like that, do you ever ask yourself why you have to "scour the bowels of the internet"? Could it be that you're looking for sh-t?
