New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Shooting cops

write on

Senator
Supporting Member
All we've been hearing about lately here and in the right wing corporate controlled news has been about blacks marching down a NYC street chanting "What do we want? Dead cops. When do we want it? Now."

But everyone remembers that white couple in Las Vegas killing of those two cops back in June of last year while they were sitting at a pizza joint and how those two cop killers were at the Bundy ranch before they killed those cops. Jerad Miller was interviewed by a local news outlet about why he was there:

"So we’re not instigating anything. We are here in response to their criminal activity, as we see it. Sure, they have “the law” [air quotes] on their side. But is it constitutional law? That’s the issue."

"Now, another big issue is our definition of constitutionality differs from theirs. You know, we are a little more strict on following the Constitution in their opinion. But I am pretty sure if our founders were alive today, they would be rolling over in their graves, or picking up a gun and doing what we’re doing."


http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2014/...ned-violence-in-interview-at-the-bundy-ranch/

Sound familiar? Right wingers here want us to forget about Miller and his murderous girlfriend and believe that that was just an isolated incident and that we should stay focused on those few dozen "black thugs" walking down the street sounding off that chant.

Well, it's not that easy when you have lily white Libertarian "thugs" running a website named CopBlock calling for the killing of cops. Compare that one night protest calling for the killing of cops by a few dozen black people walking down a NYC street with a website ran by white libertarians that is always up and running online looking to recruit fellow cop killers:

"Of course, on a practical level, openly resisting the gang called “government” is usually very hazardous to one’s health. But there is a big difference between obeying for the sake of self-preservation, which is often necessary and rational, and feeling a moral obligation to go along with whatever the ruling class wants to do to you, which is pathetic and insane. Most of the incomprehensible atrocities that have occurred throughout history were due in large part to the fact that most people answer “never” to the question of “When should you shoot a cop?” The correct answer is: When evil is “legal,” become a criminal. When oppression is enacted as “law,” become a “law-breaker.” When those violently victimizing the innocent have badges, become a cop-killer.

The next time you hear of a police officer being killed “in the line of duty,” take a moment to consider the very real possibility that maybe in that case, the “law enforcer” was the bad guy and the “cop killer” was the good guy. As it happens, that has been the case more often than not throughout human history.


You should read the entire essay in the link below to see their justification for killing cops.

http://www.copblock.org/5475/when-should-you-shoot-a-cop/

But it doesn't stop there. CopBlock is promoting what seems to be an innocuous app called Peacekeeper to grow its membership.

*Nice name for an app, don't you think? Just perfect for CopBlocker. /sarcasm

"Georgia Cop Block’s vision in using the Peace Keeper app is to make it easier for us to help protect one another during police encounters. If you have a police encounter you can send out an alert under intruder and whoever is in your area nearest you can if possible respond to your location and film your encounter with police for your protection."

http://copblock.ga/first-response-group/
 
All we've been hearing about lately here and in the right wing corporate controlled news has been about blacks marching down a NYC street chanting "What do we want? Dead cops. When do we want it? Now."

But everyone remembers that white couple in Las Vegas killing of those two cops back in June of last year while they were sitting at a pizza joint and how those two cop killers were at the Bundy ranch before they killed those cops. Jerad Miller was interviewed by a local news outlet about why he was there:

"So we’re not instigating anything. We are here in response to their criminal activity, as we see it. Sure, they have “the law” [air quotes] on their side. But is it constitutional law? That’s the issue."

"Now, another big issue is our definition of constitutionality differs from theirs. You know, we are a little more strict on following the Constitution in their opinion. But I am pretty sure if our founders were alive today, they would be rolling over in their graves, or picking up a gun and doing what we’re doing."


http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2014/...ned-violence-in-interview-at-the-bundy-ranch/

Sound familiar? Right wingers here want us to forget about Miller and his murderous girlfriend and believe that that was just an isolated incident and that we should stay focused on those few dozen "black thugs" walking down the street sounding off that chant.

Well, it's not that easy when you have lily white Libertarian "thugs" running a website named CopBlock calling for the killing of cops. Compare that one night protest calling for the killing of cops by a few dozen black people walking down a NYC street with a website ran by white libertarians that is always up and running online looking to recruit fellow cop killers:

"Of course, on a practical level, openly resisting the gang called “government” is usually very hazardous to one’s health. But there is a big difference between obeying for the sake of self-preservation, which is often necessary and rational, and feeling a moral obligation to go along with whatever the ruling class wants to do to you, which is pathetic and insane. Most of the incomprehensible atrocities that have occurred throughout history were due in large part to the fact that most people answer “never” to the question of “When should you shoot a cop?” The correct answer is: When evil is “legal,” become a criminal. When oppression is enacted as “law,” become a “law-breaker.” When those violently victimizing the innocent have badges, become a cop-killer.

The next time you hear of a police officer being killed “in the line of duty,” take a moment to consider the very real possibility that maybe in that case, the “law enforcer” was the bad guy and the “cop killer” was the good guy. As it happens, that has been the case more often than not throughout human history.


You should read the entire essay in the link below to see their justification for killing cops.

http://www.copblock.org/5475/when-should-you-shoot-a-cop/

But it doesn't stop there. CopBlock is promoting what seems to be an innocuous app called Peacekeeper to grow its membership.

*Nice name for an app, don't you think? Just perfect for CopBlocker. /sarcasm

"Georgia Cop Block’s vision in using the Peace Keeper app is to make it easier for us to help protect one another during police encounters. If you have a police encounter you can send out an alert under intruder and whoever is in your area nearest you can if possible respond to your location and film your encounter with police for your protection."

http://copblock.ga/first-response-group/
There is a youtube video to go with this, I posted it here once and some posters shit themselves. As for the app, well if you reject the police, you shouldn't ask them to protect you so making your own arrangements seems prudent.
 
There is a youtube video to go with this, I posted it here once and some posters shit themselves. As for the app, well if you reject the police, you shouldn't ask them to protect you so making your own arrangements seems prudent.
I've seen the video and was going to embed it but I decided to post the website where it is instead. I urged those that read my post to read the entire essay in the link where they will also find the video.

Notice that I said that the Peacekeeper app seems innocuous but is being utilized by a group of cop haters who happen to be white and are saying the same thing that those few dozen black people were chanting while walking in that NY protest.

My point is is the problems that those people using that app can and will cause the police that answer a call where they are. How will cops know whether or not there is some nut like Jerad Miller in the group? They could cost a cop his/her life because of all the guns around. I said this back when the open and concealed carry debate was hot here several mos. ago.

“We don’t mind them cop-watching — just leave your guns in the car, leave your guns at home,” Cook said. “It just changes the dynamic when you show up with an AR-15 or an AK-47 on a traffic stop, especially in light of the national incidents that are occurring.”


http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2015/01/...-after-screaming-obscenities-at-texas-police/
 
Notice that I said that the Peacekeeper app seems innocuous but is being utilized by a group of cop haters who happen to be white and are saying the same thing that those few dozen black people were chanting while walking in that NY protest.

They don't just happen to be white. The entire point of your thread is that they are white. You're a racist, plain and simple.
 
All we've been hearing about lately here and in the right wing corporate controlled news has been about blacks marching down a NYC street chanting "What do we want? Dead cops. When do we want it? Now."

But everyone remembers that white couple in Las Vegas killing of those two cops back in June of last year while they were sitting at a pizza joint and how those two cop killers were at the Bundy ranch before they killed those cops. Jerad Miller was interviewed by a local news outlet about why he was there:

"So we’re not instigating anything. We are here in response to their criminal activity, as we see it. Sure, they have “the law” [air quotes] on their side. But is it constitutional law? That’s the issue."

"Now, another big issue is our definition of constitutionality differs from theirs. You know, we are a little more strict on following the Constitution in their opinion. But I am pretty sure if our founders were alive today, they would be rolling over in their graves, or picking up a gun and doing what we’re doing."


http://www.splcenter.org/blog/2014/...ned-violence-in-interview-at-the-bundy-ranch/

Sound familiar? Right wingers here want us to forget about Miller and his murderous girlfriend and believe that that was just an isolated incident and that we should stay focused on those few dozen "black thugs" walking down the street sounding off that chant.

Well, it's not that easy when you have lily white Libertarian "thugs" running a website named CopBlock calling for the killing of cops. Compare that one night protest calling for the killing of cops by a few dozen black people walking down a NYC street with a website ran by white libertarians that is always up and running online looking to recruit fellow cop killers:

"Of course, on a practical level, openly resisting the gang called “government” is usually very hazardous to one’s health. But there is a big difference between obeying for the sake of self-preservation, which is often necessary and rational, and feeling a moral obligation to go along with whatever the ruling class wants to do to you, which is pathetic and insane. Most of the incomprehensible atrocities that have occurred throughout history were due in large part to the fact that most people answer “never” to the question of “When should you shoot a cop?” The correct answer is: When evil is “legal,” become a criminal. When oppression is enacted as “law,” become a “law-breaker.” When those violently victimizing the innocent have badges, become a cop-killer.

The next time you hear of a police officer being killed “in the line of duty,” take a moment to consider the very real possibility that maybe in that case, the “law enforcer” was the bad guy and the “cop killer” was the good guy. As it happens, that has been the case more often than not throughout human history.


You should read the entire essay in the link below to see their justification for killing cops.

http://www.copblock.org/5475/when-should-you-shoot-a-cop/

But it doesn't stop there. CopBlock is promoting what seems to be an innocuous app called Peacekeeper to grow its membership.

*Nice name for an app, don't you think? Just perfect for CopBlocker. /sarcasm

"Georgia Cop Block’s vision in using the Peace Keeper app is to make it easier for us to help protect one another during police encounters. If you have a police encounter you can send out an alert under intruder and whoever is in your area nearest you can if possible respond to your location and film your encounter with police for your protection."

http://copblock.ga/first-response-group/

Sounds like "copblock" and the thugs-of all colors-screaming for dead cops have a lot in common. But I haven't seen anyone try and brush murders of cops by anyone. But we're not responsible for the things other people say. If Copblock and that nut out in Colorado are claiming it's right to kill cops, that's on them.

And speaking of lily white cop killers, you bet they're out there. Ask Barack, he invited one to two of his homes...the home in Chicago and the home in DC. Good thing Clinton pardoned the guy first.
 
I've seen the video and was going to embed it but I decided to post the website where it is instead. I urged those that read my post to read the entire essay in the link where they will also find the video.

Notice that I said that the Peacekeeper app seems innocuous but is being utilized by a group of cop haters who happen to be white and are saying the same thing that those few dozen black people were chanting while walking in that NY protest.

My point is is the problems that those people using that app can and will cause the police that answer a call where they are. How will cops know whether or not there is some nut like Jerad Miller in the group? They could cost a cop his/her life because of all the guns around. I said this back when the open and concealed carry debate was hot here several mos. ago.

“We don’t mind them cop-watching — just leave your guns in the car, leave your guns at home,” Cook said. “It just changes the dynamic when you show up with an AR-15 or an AK-47 on a traffic stop, especially in light of the national incidents that are occurring.”


http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2015/01/...-after-screaming-obscenities-at-texas-police/
Well, that's kind of the problem on both sides isn't it? It is very hard to tell the difference between a "protestor", and an "agitator". People who are peacefully assembling in a public place are simply asserting their rights, even if they happen to have an AK slung over their shoulder; nothing illegal about that, but interfering with the cops who are doing what they're paid to do, is something different. Just as other protestors standing on the sidewalk aren't breaking any laws.... until they step into the road and begin blocking traffic, and then assaulting anyone who objects to it. It's their right to do as they wish.... until they start interfering with others.
 
Sounds like "copblock" and the thugs-of all colors-screaming for dead cops have a lot in common. But I haven't seen anyone try and brush murders of cops by anyone. But we're not responsible for the things other people say. If Copblock and that nut out in Colorado are claiming it's right to kill cops, that's on them.

And speaking of lily white cop killers, you bet they're out there. Ask Barack, he invited one to two of his homes...the home in Chicago and the home in DC. Good thing Clinton pardoned the guy first.
"But I haven't seen anyone try and brush murders of cops by anyone."

What does that mean?

This thread has nothing, nada, zilch to do with Obama or Ayers. If you want to talk about them, start a thread about it and quit trying to hijack mine.
 
So if I have the story straight, this Cordova guy was legally and openly carrying a pre-1899 black powder pistol, which did not meet the legal definition of a firearm, but he was arrested because the mere presence of such a weapon constituted a threat that the police spokesperson compared to showing up with an AR-15 or an AK-47?
No, that's not why he was arrested. You need to read the link in the Raw Story article.

Start with this one...

http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unf...ont_like_being_cussed_out_by_people_holdi.php

And then read this one. It's a long 3 page article about a Dallas Observer journalist following those copblock guys around for a couple of nights and writing about it.

http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unf...nd_trolling_police_in_the_name_of_liberty.php

Those copblockers invoked the chant used by blacks. If this was a bunch of black people doing the same thing as these whites are, you can bet that the outcome would have been very different. Hell, the black protesters haven't been carrying firearms but they get guns pointed at them by cops-unlike these white so called 'copblockers' who are carrying getting treated with kid gloves. That's basically what my OP is about.

"The group laughs. Who's to say the cops aren't taking advantage of the group's break, rounding people up when they're not there to film? Watkins walks toward the door, turns around and holds up his phone. Time for a group photo. The cop-watchers put their hands up, as if someone were pointing a gun at them. As Watkins snaps the picture, they say, "Hands up, don't shoot."
 
"But I haven't seen anyone try and brush murders of cops by anyone."

What does that mean?

This thread has nothing, nada, zilch to do with Obama or Ayers. If you want to talk about them, start a thread about it and quit trying to hijack mine.


Sorry....should have been "I haven't seen anyone trying to brush OFF murders of cops."

Your premise is that "cons" want to brush these attitudes under the rug when they're held by white people, particularly "cons". My point is, that's not true. Some crazy group starts a website and it's suddenly a referendum on everybody else? And...also, if we're talking about brushing cop killings under the rug, we DO have to talk about Obama and his hospitality toward Ayers.
 
Sorry....should have been "I haven't seen anyone trying to brush OFF murders of cops."

Your premise is that "cons" want to brush these attitudes under the rug when they're held by white people, particularly "cons". My point is, that's not true. Some crazy group starts a website and it's suddenly a referendum on everybody else? And...also, if we're talking about brushing cop killings under the rug, we DO have to talk about Obama and his hospitality toward Ayers.
Well, your minions seem to think that what those protesters chanted encapsulates every black person in the U.S. but you don't seem to have a problem with that.

Again, this thread isn't about Obama or Ayers. If you want to talk about that, start a thread and if I feel like it, I'll respond.
 
Isn't it funny how the bootlickers always get an acute case of the stupids when these subjects come up?
He proves my point by asking that question. I keep telling gigi that this thread has nothing to do with Obama or Ayers. That's why he didn't know who she was talking about because she's attempting to hijack this thread by talking about them.
 
Those copblockers invoked the chant used by blacks. If this was a bunch of black people doing the same thing as these whites are, you can bet that the outcome would have been very different. Hell, the black protesters haven't been carrying firearms but they get guns pointed at them by cops-unlike these white so called 'copblockers' who are carrying getting treated with kid gloves. That's basically what my OP is about.

There are a lot worse uses of white privilege than resisting (rather effectively, it would seem) police overreach.
 
And...also, if we're talking about brushing cop killings under the rug, we DO have to talk about Obama and his hospitality toward Ayers.

Neither Ayers nor the Weathermen ever killed a cop. In fact, the only people the Weathermen killed were some of their own when a bomb accidentally went off.
 
Back
Top