New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Simple

Yup, here I am. I detest repetitiveness and have no problem saying it.

That's why you don't see me here day in and day out.

I don't mind you being here.

If you threadjack, however, I am going to call you out on it.


No worries - It's all good.
 
You didn't address a single point in the post you replied to - You just spewed hate and contempt.

I must assume there was not a point you felt you could successfully challenge, so you just threw a tantrum instead.

It actually made me feel better about my position.


It's all good.
Ok. I'll address your post so your panties don't get in a wad with a question.

What do you have against PBS?
 
You call it threadjack, I call it truthfact.

It can be both.

I could join a thread discussing quilting and talk about how zebras have stripes.

My post is ""truthfact" but it is not relevant to the discussion.

That's what you do.

The intellectually honest thing to do would be to start a thread on your preferred topic.

That would be the right thing to do, but it is unlikely to be the thing that you do.

So, in conclusion, if you threadjack, expect to be called out on it.


It's all good.
 
It can be both.

I could join a thread discussing quilting and talk about how zebras have stripes.

My post is ""truthfact" but it is not relevant to the discussion.

That's what you do.

The intellectually honest thing to do would be to start a thread on your preferred topic.

That would be the right thing to do, but it is unlikely to be the thing that you do.

So, in conclusion, if you threadjack, expect to be called out on it.


It's all good.
Why would you start a thread dissing PBS?

Answer that and we'll move on.
 
Why would you join one?


The topic interests me, and the facts presented are accurate.
Who forces you to join?

I didn't want it to come to this with you, but your forced me to.


You're #11 on the list
 
Who forces you to join?

I didn't want it to come to this with you, but your forced me to.


You're #11 on the list

I didn't force you to do a thing. Indeed, how could I?

You chose to. That's on you.

I'm flattered, however, that you believe I have such power over you. I do not, however, it's all in your head.
 
I didn't force you to do a thing. Indeed, how could I?

You chose to. That's on you.

I'm flattered, however, that you believe I have such power over you. I do not, however, it's all in your head.
Answer the question

Why did you post a thread dissing PBS?
 
That post has nothing to do with the question.

Why did it interest you?

Of course it did.

Why did I post about (among other things) PBS?

The subject interests me. Why else would anyone post about anything?

It also involves the use of taxpayer dollars. That, of course, is potentially of interest to anyone who pays taxes.
 
Of course it did.

Why did I post about (among other things) PBS?

The subject interests me. Why else would anyone post about anything?

It also involves the use of taxpayer dollars. That, of course, is potentially of interest to anyone who pays taxes.
Ok then. I posted my expanded thoughts on the subject and you accused me of threadjacking. Who are you to tell me what to post?
 
Ok then. I posted my expanded thoughts on the subject and you accused me of threadjacking. Who are you to tell me what to post?

You replied to my top post with this in post #32:

You and your ilk are scared shitless and need to change the narrative to keep the willful ignorant on board.

History hasn't been kind to Republicans in the 20th Century and, as a matter of fact, now in the 21st Century, so you are attempting to rewrite history.

What's the matter with you people?

Are you so tired of what America is to the point that you now have to become a cultist using hatred and spite of the Democratic party and call it 'change' while filling the Trump and his minions coffers?

WWJD



Not one mention of PBS in there anywhere. In fact, it's nothing more than an ad hominem rant.

You discussed nothing in the post you replied to. That's what a threadjack is.

So I called it a threadjack.


Now we're up to speed.


 
You replied to my top post with this in post #32:

You and your ilk are scared shitless and need to change the narrative to keep the willful ignorant on board.

History hasn't been kind to Republicans in the 20th Century and, as a matter of fact, now in the 21st Century, so you are attempting to rewrite history.

What's the matter with you people?

Are you so tired of what America is to the point that you now have to become a cultist using hatred and spite of the Democratic party and call it 'change' while filling the Trump and his minions coffers?

WWJD



Not one mention of PBS in there anywhere. In fact, it's nothing more than an ad hominem rant.

You discussed nothing in the post you replied to. That's what a threadjack is.

So I called it a threadjack.


Now we're up to speed.
I won't be dictated on what to post. I clearly stated that my posts are 'expanded'. If you can't follow, don't come whining to me,
 
Back
Top