New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Since conservatives lie so much can we follow some simple debate rules?

YouCantHandleDaTruth

YouCantHandleDaTruth

Governor
1. Keep position simple and to the point
2. 2 - 3 supporting links from CREDIBLE sources (brietbart and drudge are NOT CREDIBLE SOURCES!!)
3. If you're going to go on a sound bite liar-tribe please at least refer back to the aforementioned with link and quote so as not to obfuscate.

Conservatives for the last two weeks have just been throwing $hit on the wall, look at their post...they mainly just cut and paste their morning fascist email in to a thread

I think Barb and sometimes doc or blue dog try to start some discussion based off policy but even that is wrought with talking points that have been proven false OVER AND OVER again.


Come on people....lets keep it interesting....not just repeat what Mitt rMoney says we already know rMoney is an OVERT bald faced liar (his father did NOT march along side of MLK)


Your take?

TIA
 
Simply because a TRUTH is so far abover your abilities, that you can not comprehend it...that does not make it a 'lie...'

Thnx!
 
YouCantHandleDaTruth said:
1. Keep position simple and to the point
2. 2 - 3 supporting links from CREDIBLE sources (brietbart and drudge are NOT CREDIBLE SOURCES!!)
3. If you're going to go on a sound bite liar-tribe please at least refer back to the aforementioned with link and quote so as not to obfuscate.

Conservatives for the last two weeks have just been throwing $hit on the wall, look at their post...they mainly just cut and paste their morning fascist email in to a thread

I think Barb and sometimes doc or blue dog try to start some discussion based off policy but even that is wrought with talking points that have been proven false OVER AND OVER again.


Come on people....lets keep it interesting....not just repeat what Mitt rMoney says we already know rMoney is an OVERT bald faced liar (his father did NOT march along side of MLK)


Your take?

TIA
Click to expand...




Ok, but I have a couple of things I would like to ask first.

Exactly who gets to deem a source to be "CREDIBLE"?

What is the actual criteria? For example, just because you disapprove of Drudge, if someone posts that they read on there that water was wet would that somehow not be true? Would you somehow choose to not accept it because of where it was posted from?

Would you be so kind as to explain how something gets to be defined as a "talking point" that must be avoided?

It is hard to figure out, what with it ONLY being applied to things conservatives or republicans mention. When researching it myself I can find NO, zero, NADA, not one single, solitary instance of a subject originating from another of you loons on the left rhat earned such a label from you or any other dim...........

Come to think of it, skippy, being we constantly see simillar babble from a multitude of you libs on here about everything any con brings up being merely "talking points",..........couldn't THAT be deemed to be simply a libby "talking point" and thereby something you wish to NOT be posted on here?



May I suggest you try to muster up the little intestinal fortitude it will require and try, just TRY to impress me by being the ONE loony-lib on here who is willing to actually try to do something they desire/demand other folks do?
 
some get sent to CF for Moderating and as we see, some don't............

k
 
YouCantHandleDaTruth said:
1. Keep position simple and to the point
2. 2 - 3 supporting links from CREDIBLE sources (brietbart and drudge are NOT CREDIBLE SOURCES!!)
3. If you're going to go on a sound bite liar-tribe please at least refer back to the aforementioned with link and quote so as not to obfuscate.

Conservatives for the last two weeks have just been throwing $hit on the wall, look at their post...they mainly just cut and paste their morning fascist email in to a thread

I think Barb and sometimes doc or blue dog try to start some discussion based off policy but even that is wrought with talking points that have been proven false OVER AND OVER again.


Come on people....lets keep it interesting....not just repeat what Mitt rMoney says we already know rMoney is an OVERT bald faced liar (his father did NOT march along side of MLK)


Your take?

TIA
Click to expand...

Since you brought up my name, can you give me something specific I stated that was "wrought with talking points that have been proven false OVER AND OVER again".
 
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top