So Close....

[Zam-Zam]

From CNN:


MICHAEL SMERCONISH, CNN HOST: Doesn't the absence of additional indictments against [Roger] Stone suggest, as the President would say, no collusion?

JONATHAN TURLEY, GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY LAW PROFESSOR: Well, it does. You have to call them as you see them. There is no evidence thus far of collusion between the Trump campaign or President Trump and the Russians and hacking these computer systems. And moreover, it's really quite unlikely, right? If you were a KGB spymaster, would you really collude with Donald Trump and put yourself one tweet away from destruction, on perhaps the most secret operation in its recent history? The answer is no they wouldn't do that. Would you hold a hypersensitive meeting at Trump Tower with half the media downstairs and not actually produce the evidence promised, instead, talk about adoptions? No. The most obvious explanation is probably the right one.

That there was not collusion in the hacking of the system. What appears to be the case is that Stone wanted to get access to this information. That's not illegal. Journalists, operatives, even academics, all try to get their hands on material like this, whether it's whistleblowing or it came from one source or another. There is nothing illegal in that. I think so far we're one collusion short of making that case.


https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...a_case_there_is_no_evidence_of_collusion.html


Now that's just plain funny.....:>)

 

[Winston]

From CNN:


MICHAEL SMERCONISH, CNN HOST: Doesn't the absence of additional indictments against [Roger] Stone suggest, as the President would say, no collusion?

JONATHAN TURLEY, GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY LAW PROFESSOR: Well, it does. You have to call them as you see them. There is no evidence thus far of collusion between the Trump campaign or President Trump and the Russians and hacking these computer systems. And moreover, it's really quite unlikely, right? If you were a KGB spymaster, would you really collude with Donald Trump and put yourself one tweet away from destruction, on perhaps the most secret operation in its recent history? The answer is no they wouldn't do that. Would you hold a hypersensitive meeting at Trump Tower with half the media downstairs and not actually produce the evidence promised, instead, talk about adoptions? No. The most obvious explanation is probably the right one.

That there was not collusion in the hacking of the system. What appears to be the case is that Stone wanted to get access to this information. That's not illegal. Journalists, operatives, even academics, all try to get their hands on material like this, whether it's whistleblowing or it came from one source or another. There is nothing illegal in that. I think so far we're one collusion short of making that case.


https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...a_case_there_is_no_evidence_of_collusion.html


Now that's just plain funny.....:>)

There are no KGB spy masters, furthermore collusion is not a crime

 

[Marcus Aurelius]

But...but...but...Trump just HAS to be guilty of collusion. He just HAS to be!!!!
***Edited***

 

[YouCantHandleDaTruth]

From CNN:


MICHAEL SMERCONISH, CNN HOST: Doesn't the absence of additional indictments against [Roger] Stone suggest, as the President would say, no collusion?

JONATHAN TURLEY, GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY LAW PROFESSOR: Well, it does...

Only *edited* believe unsubstantiated crap nobodies on TV says

 

[MrMike]

There were smart ones back when they were still “liberals”. Once they all sold their souls to the almighty collectivist State and became dogmatic leftists, the IQs plummeted.

I miss Alameda. That was a decent (sane) Fray Liberal. This new crop of Liberals are insane and they'd probably turn on him quickly.

 

[RickWA]

I miss Alameda. That was a decent (sane) Fray Liberal. This new crop of Liberals are insane and they'd probably turn on him quickly.

He’s a good dude. So is HazeyDavey.

The current crop of absolutist lefty ‘tards is pathetic. These kooks can’t even pen a basic two sentence post without screwing it up.

It’s the pot.

 

[Deleted member 21794]

He’s a good dude. So is HazeyDavey.

The current crop of absolutist lefty ‘tards is pathetic. These kooks can’t even pen a basic two sentence post without screwing it up.

It’s the pot.

Ah yes you're making me nostalgic for the days when we didn't have to lazily shoot fish in a barrel.

 

[RickWA]

Ah yes you're making me nostalgic for the days when we didn't have to lazily shoot fish in a barrel.

:-(

Sad stuff.

 

[Spamature]

From CNN:


MICHAEL SMERCONISH, CNN HOST: Doesn't the absence of additional indictments against [Roger] Stone suggest, as the President would say, no collusion?

JONATHAN TURLEY, GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY LAW PROFESSOR: Well, it does. You have to call them as you see them. There is no evidence thus far of collusion between the Trump campaign or President Trump and the Russians and hacking these computer systems. And moreover, it's really quite unlikely, right? If you were a KGB spymaster, would you really collude with Donald Trump and put yourself one tweet away from destruction, on perhaps the most secret operation in its recent history? The answer is no they wouldn't do that. Would you hold a hypersensitive meeting at Trump Tower with half the media downstairs and not actually produce the evidence promised, instead, talk about adoptions? No. The most obvious explanation is probably the right one.

That there was not collusion in the hacking of the system. What appears to be the case is that Stone wanted to get access to this information. That's not illegal. Journalists, operatives, even academics, all try to get their hands on material like this, whether it's whistleblowing or it came from one source or another. There is nothing illegal in that. I think so far we're one collusion short of making that case.


https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...a_case_there_is_no_evidence_of_collusion.html


Now that's just plain funny.....:>)

This is a counterintelligence investigation. What Stone is charged with vs what he did may be fodder for public consumption. Also his activities need not be a crime in order to charge an overall conspiracy to commit a crime.

 

[Winston]

This is a counterintelligence investigation. What Stone is charged with vs what he did may be fodder for public consumption. Also his activities need not be a crime in order to charge an overall conspiracy to commit a crime.

Why cant we know?


Lol

 

[Spamature]

Why cant we know?


Lol

Because there is likely evidence that comes from intelligence sources like signals intelligence and probably even agents or assets within Russia and its government.

 

[Winston]

Because there is likely evidence that comes from intelligence sources like signals intelligence and probably even agents or assets within Russia and its government.

Oh. The same reason the nsa cant release billaries emails that she destroyed but they still have

 

[Boca]

From CNN:


MICHAEL SMERCONISH, CNN HOST: Doesn't the absence of additional indictments against [Roger] Stone suggest, as the President would say, no collusion?

JONATHAN TURLEY, GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY LAW PROFESSOR: Well, it does. You have to call them as you see them. There is no evidence thus far of collusion between the Trump campaign or President Trump and the Russians and hacking these computer systems. And moreover, it's really quite unlikely, right? If you were a KGB spymaster, would you really collude with Donald Trump and put yourself one tweet away from destruction, on perhaps the most secret operation in its recent history? The answer is no they wouldn't do that. Would you hold a hypersensitive meeting at Trump Tower with half the media downstairs and not actually produce the evidence promised, instead, talk about adoptions? No. The most obvious explanation is probably the right one.

That there was not collusion in the hacking of the system. What appears to be the case is that Stone wanted to get access to this information. That's not illegal. Journalists, operatives, even academics, all try to get their hands on material like this, whether it's whistleblowing or it came from one source or another. There is nothing illegal in that. I think so far we're one collusion short of making that case.


https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...a_case_there_is_no_evidence_of_collusion.html


Now that's just plain funny.....:>)

Clearly there was collusion to sway the election. They just got the wrong candidate.

I think it's called projection. Moreover I think it wasn't so much that said candidate lost as it was she needed a damn good excuse why she spent a billion dollars of other people's money and lost.

A vanity thing.

 

[Zam-Zam]

But...but...but...Trump just HAS to be guilty of collusion. He just HAS to be!!!!
***Edited***

These stories keep popping up lately. It could be that Team Mueller is slowly leaking that there's no there, there, so the faithful won't be too devastated when it ends up being a nothing-burger. Let them down gently, a little bit at a time, lest they be crushed all at once.

Donald Trump, love him or hate him, is about to enter his 27th month of his 48 month term, and Mueller still hasn't laid a finger on him. Time's starting to run short.....

 

[Boca]

These stories keep popping up lately. It could be that Team Mueller is slowly leaking that there's no there, there, so the faithful won't be too devastated when it ends up being a nothing-burger. Let them down gently, a little bit at a time, lest they be crushed all at once.

Donald Trump, love him or hate him, is about to enter his 27th month of his 48 month term, and Mueller still hasn't laid a finger on him. Time's starting to run short.....

Agreed...he's trying to find a way out of what he knows is a circus and he finds himself the Ringmaster.