So how does Fox News headline the Hagel hearing?

[Bugsy McGurk]

"Hagel admits administration mishandled aspects of Taliban swap"

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...rgdahl-swap-in-first-public-hearing-on-trade/

Then you read the article - it babbles about process, not the swap itself. Hagel fully supports the swap.

Oh that Faux News!

;-)

 

[Dino]

"Hagel admits administration mishandled aspects of Taliban swap"

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...rgdahl-swap-in-first-public-hearing-on-trade/

Then you read the article - it babbles about process, not the swap itself. Hagel fully supports the swap.

Oh that Faux News!

;-)

Your consistency at never telling the truth is astounding.

In his opening remarks, Hagel also said both he and President Obama were on board with the decision -- amid some confusion in Washington over who technically approved the trade. "I want to make one fundamental point -- I would never sign any document or make any agreement ... that I did not feel was in the best interests of this country," Hagel said. "Nor would the president of the United States, who made the final decision with the full support of his national security team."

Obviously, IN THE ARTICLE, it says Hagel supported the swap.
Holy sheeee-it.

 

[Dawg]

Your consistency at never telling the truth is astounding.

In his opening remarks, Hagel also said both he and President Obama were on board with the decision -- amid some confusion in Washington over who technically approved the trade. "I want to make one fundamental point -- I would never sign any document or make any agreement ... that I did not feel was in the best interests of this country," Hagel said. "Nor would the president of the United States, who made the final decision with the full support of his national security team."

Obviously, IN THE ARTICLE, it says Hagel supported the swap.
Holy sheeee-it.

Hagel isn't taking the FALL...........he may want to avoid PARKS........'O' of course lied straight faced to Americans Hagel made the final decision.............'O' bus soon will have no tires on the pavement.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

Your consistency at never telling the truth is astounding.

In his opening remarks, Hagel also said both he and President Obama were on board with the decision -- amid some confusion in Washington over who technically approved the trade. "I want to make one fundamental point -- I would never sign any document or make any agreement ... that I did not feel was in the best interests of this country," Hagel said. "Nor would the president of the United States, who made the final decision with the full support of his national security team."

Obviously, IN THE ARTICLE, it says Hagel supported the swap.
Holy sheeee-it.

What are you babbling about? Hagel supports the swap. That's the point - the Faux News headline suggests he waffled about it.

 

[Dino]

What are you babbling about? Hagel supports the swap. That's the point - the Faux News headline suggests he waffled about it.

The headline said aspects were mishandled...just like Hagel said and it's undoubtedly true. It does NOT suggest Hagel was against the swap. Not at all.

YOU go on to say: "Then you read the article - it babbles about process, not the swap itself. Hagel fully supports the swap."

Well the article does discuss the swap- and that Hagel supported it.

So you're a straight-up liar. Now just go on ahead and admit your error.

 

[Dawg]

The headline said aspects were mishandled...just like Hagel said and it's undoubtedly true. It does NOT suggest Hagel was against the swap. Not at all.

YOU go on to say: "Then you read the article - it babbles about process, not the swap itself. Hagel fully supports the swap."

Well the article does discuss the swap- and that Hagel supported it.

So you're a straight-up liar. Now just go on ahead and admit your error.

as Hillary.................TC3 has always been a liar

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

The headline said aspects were mishandled...just like Hagel said and it's undoubtedly true. It does NOT suggest Hagel was against the swap. Not at all.

YOU go on to say: "Then you read the article - it babbles about process, not the swap itself. Hagel fully supports the swap."

Well the article does discuss the swap- and that Hagel supported it.

So you're a straight-up liar. Now just go on ahead and admit your error.

Your re-write of the headline fails.

Here it is again...

"Hagel admits administration mishandled aspects of Taliban swap"

Did he fully support the swap? Yep. Did the swap go off without a hitch? Yep. Does Hagel have any reservations about the swap or its execution? Nope. Does Fox's absurd headline suggest that he does? Yep.

Notification of Congress is not "the swap." It's process.

But I'm not surprised that those in the Fox News flock, like you, think it's legit reporting. You're brainwashed.

 

[Dino]

Your re-write of the headline fails.

Here it is again...

"Hagel admits administration mishandled aspects of Taliban swap"

Did he fully support the swap? Yep. Did the swap go off without a hitch? Yep. Does Hagel have any reservations about the swap or its execution? Nope. Does Fox's absurd headline suggest that he does? Yep.

Notification of Congress is not "the swap." It's process.

But I'm not surprised that those in the Fox News flock, like you, think it's legit reporting. You're brainwashed.

It's this kind of needless lying that makes me wonder why people bother posting to you at all.

It's a sign of something broken in your personality. I seriously think you need professional help.

Good luck.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

It's this kind of needless lying that makes me wonder why people bother posting to you at all.

It's a sign of something broken in your personality. I seriously think you need professional help.

Good luck.

Lying? WTF?

Yer a mental patient.