New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

So.....

Boca

Governor
a black federal judge has overruled a 70 percent vote of Oklahomans that Sharia law cannot be Oklahoma law?

Aside from the question of why a federal judge can step in and void the vote of 70% of Oklahoma citizens on Oklahoma's Constitution, there's the question of where the hell is all the ammunition?

U.S. District Judge Vicki Miles-LaGrange permanently enjoined the State Election Board and its secretary, Paul Ziriax, from certifying results of the vote in which State Question 755 was approved by Oklahoma voters. The measure was passed with 70 percent of the vote on Nov. 2, 2010.
 
Last edited:
a black federal judge has overruled a 70 percent vote of Oklahomans that Sharia law cannot be Oklahoma law?

Aside from the question of why a federal judge can step in and void the vote of 70% of Oklahoma citizens on Oklahoma's Constitution, there's the question of where the hell is all the ammunition?

So..... You want your Civil War to start?
 
a black federal judge has overruled a 70 percent vote of Oklahomans that Sharia law cannot be Oklahoma law?

Aside from the question of why a federal judge can step in and void the vote of 70% of Oklahoma citizens on Oklahoma's Constitution, there's the question of where the hell is all the ammunition?

The feds have been overruling state laws a lot during the Obama regime. Remember what kind of crap Arizona has gone through and is going through with the feds.

The Obama regime is really becoming one of tyranny.
 
The feds have been overruling state laws a lot during the Obama regime.

I know that, but how the hell do they get away with it? The same way Nazis got away with concentration camps....citizen ambivalence.

How can a law that protects the Constitution be ruled unconstitutional? The judge ruled against protecting the constitution in order protect the rights of citizens. In this case Muslims. She may be politically correct, but she's either liberally progressive or legally braindead stupid...or more likely both.

If a woman marries a Muslim man and he beats the hell out of her for whatever reason Sharia law allows is that a violation of her rights or not? Is stoning a woman for adultery "cruel and unusual punishment"?

And the freaks here talk about wars on women!
 
All 50 states are under federal national security occupation: The state legislature must nullify the Federal Junta's illegal order, then arrest any federal official who brakes state law in trying implement their illegal dictate.
 
a black federal judge has overruled a 70 percent vote of Oklahomans that Sharia law cannot be Oklahoma law?

Aside from the question of why a federal judge can step in and void the vote of 70% of Oklahoma citizens on Oklahoma's Constitution, there's the question of where the hell is all the ammunition?


I know we are having such a problem with sharia law in this country. North Carolina put it on a bill and on the same bill it tonight women reproductive freedom. This is all about discrimination against Muslims
 
I know that, but how the hell do they get away with it? The same way Nazis got away with concentration camps....citizen ambivalence.

How can a law that protects the Constitution be ruled unconstitutional? The judge ruled against protecting the constitution in order protect the rights of citizens. In this case Muslims. She may be politically correct, but she's either liberally progressive or legally braindead stupid...or more likely both.

If a woman marries a Muslim man and he beats the hell out of her for whatever reason Sharia law allows is that a violation of her rights or not? Is stoning a woman for adultery "cruel and unusual punishment"?

And the freaks here talk about wars on women!


If a man beats the hell out of a woman sharia law does not protect him in this country. There was a case like this many years ago when a Chinese man beat his wife and he claimed that was part of his culture. He went to jail. Yes we are having so many problems with stoning.
 
a black federal judge has overruled a 70 percent vote of Oklahomans that Sharia law cannot be Oklahoma law?

Aside from the question of why a federal judge can step in and void the vote of 70% of Oklahoma citizens on Oklahoma's Constitution, there's the question of where the hell is all the ammunition?

Yeah, it's that Judicial Review business. The U.S. Constitution trumps any state constitution, laws that are determined to be unconstitutional are void regardless of how popular they are, that sort of thing... Search your memories; surely this all sounds at least vaguely familiar.

Cheers.
 
Yeah, it's that Judicial Review business. The U.S. Constitution trumps any state constitution, laws that are determined to be unconstitutional are void regardless of how popular they are, that sort of thing... Search your memories; surely this all sounds at least vaguely familiar.

Cheers.

This aint the same constitution your daddy lived under.

Today's crony progressive constitution, (freedom 2.0) dictates only govt has the right to bear arms, illegals are victims and granted minority status, no reasonable expectation of being secure in your papers or persons, and you have the right to be detained without probable cause under the grounds of the constitution.

You ain't living in your daddy's America any more!

We ALL are under the occupation of Obama's AmericAA- Transformation Council, financed by international bankers.
 
This aint the same constitution your daddy lived under.

Today's crony progressive constitution, (freedom 2.0) dictates only govt has the right to bear arms, illegals are victims and granted minority status, no reasonable expectation of being secure in your papers or persons, and you have the right to be detained without probable cause under the grounds of the constitution.

You ain't living in your daddy's America any more!

We ALL are under the occupation of Obama's AmericAA- Transformation Council, financed by international bankers.

loosen your tin foil hat Worldly, it's getting too tight again.
 
This aint the same constitution your daddy lived under.

Today's crony progressive constitution, (freedom 2.0) dictates only govt has the right to bear arms, illegals are victims and granted minority status, no reasonable expectation of being secure in your papers or persons, and you have the right to be detained without probable cause under the grounds of the constitution.

You ain't living in your daddy's America any more!

We ALL are under the occupation of Obama's AmericAA- Transformation Council, financed by international bankers.

Well, yes and no... Our interpretations of the Constitution do change over time, heedless of those who like to pretend they don't or at least shouldn't. I'd argue that some if not most of the changes we've seen have been to the good. I do have some problems with our current understanding of the 4th amendment, as I've described elsewhere. Past that, there are other constitutional protections I'd like to see established and expanded.

So yeah, it's a work in progress and we're surely not guaranteed any particular outcome. We have to work to make things better and to try to avoid the pitfalls in our path. I really don't see where indulging in paranoid delusions helps the process, though.

Cheers.
 
This aint the same constitution your daddy lived under.

Today's crony progressive constitution, (freedom 2.0) dictates only govt has the right to bear arms, illegals are victims and granted minority status, no reasonable expectation of being secure in your papers or persons, and you have the right to be detained without probable cause under the grounds of the constitution.

You ain't living in your daddy's America any more!

We ALL are under the occupation of Obama's AmericAA- Transformation Council, financed by international bankers.


You are one scary dude.....people who live in the paranoia you live in are the loose cannons who blow up building s
 
Well, yes and no... Our interpretations of the Constitution do change over time, heedless of those who like to pretend they don't or at least shouldn't. I'd argue that some if not most of the changes we've seen have been to the good. I do have some problems with our current understanding of the 4th amendment, as I've described elsewhere. Past that, there are other constitutional protections I'd like to see established and expanded.

So yeah, it's a work in progress and we're surely not guaranteed any particular outcome. We have to work to make things better and to try to avoid the pitfalls in our path. I really don't see where indulging in paranoid delusions helps the process, though.

Cheers.

That's NOT how the constitution is to be changed.

According to the Constitution, the legal process to change the constitution is to vote on AMENDING or REPEALING through constitutional amendments.

However....Organizing Americans to support repealing the 2nd, or amending the 4th,5th,10, parts of the Bill of Rights, is a lot harder than having a bankrupt/corrupt political system dictate that pleading the 5th NO LONGER gives anyone the right to remain silent. <link>
 
That's NOT how the constitution is to be changed.

According to the Constitution, the legal process to change the constitution is to vote on AMENDING or REPEALING through constitutional amendments.

However....Organizing Americans to support repealing the 2nd, or amending the 4th,5th,10, parts of the Bill of Rights, is a lot harder than having a bankrupt/corrupt political system dictate that pleading the 5th NO LONGER gives anyone the right to remain silent. <link>

May I recommend:

awww.omninfo.com_wp_content_uploads_2011_09_chamomile_Tea.jpg
You'll feel better.

Cheers.
 
You are one scary dude.....people who live in the paranoia you live in are the loose cannons who blow up building s

You think I say this sh*t to be funny?

Everything I posted was true and I have links to prove it.

This aint the same constitution your daddy lived under.

Today's crony progressive constitution, (freedom 2.0) dictates only govt has the right to bear arms, illegals are victims and granted minority status, no reasonable expectation of being secure in your papers or persons, and you have the right to be detained without probable cause under the grounds of the constitution.

You ain't living in your daddy's America any more!

We ALL are under the occupation of Obama's AmericAA- Transformation Council, financed by international bankers.

I'm not only freaking out, I'M SCARED TO DEATH because if history has proved one thing over and over again, it is crony democratic authoritarian big govts eventually consolidate and consume everything, while becoming very tyrannical usually resulting in tens of millions ending up murdered.

I could "Hope" this time it is going to be different. But, all I see is Americans begging for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jen
I know that, but how the hell do they get away with it? The same way Nazis got away with concentration camps....citizen ambivalence.

How can a law that protects the Constitution be ruled unconstitutional? The judge ruled against protecting the constitution in order protect the rights of citizens. In this case Muslims. She may be politically correct, but she's either liberally progressive or legally braindead stupid...or more likely both.

If a woman marries a Muslim man and he beats the hell out of her for whatever reason Sharia law allows is that a violation of her rights or not? Is stoning a woman for adultery "cruel and unusual punishment"?

And the freaks here talk about wars on women!

They do it by playing the "if you don't agree with us you're a racist" card.
And it works.
 
Back
Top