New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Sooo ... who exactly should "put up or shut up"?

lupehernandezdepedajack said:
In this country the burden of proof resides with the accuser
Click to expand...

Yes, but the accused is REQUIRED to provide all evidence demanded.

Romney's defense is like a bank robber saying "He's accusing me of bank robbery and having $100,000 in my house. He's got to produce the $100,000, but you can't go in my house and look and see if it's there. Just take my word. I don't have the money!"
 
GordonGecko said:
Yes, but the accused is REQUIRED to provide all evidence demanded.

Romney's defense is like a bank robber saying "He's accusing me of bank robbery and having $100,000 in my house. He's got to produce the $100,000, but you can't go in my house and look and see if it's there. Just take my word. I don't have the money!"
Click to expand...

If I were you I would avoid giving legal advice.
 
They're not in a courtroom. Reid has no burden of proof. Technically,Willard doesn't either. Both can just let it lie.
 
GordonGecko said:
Romney's defense is like a bank robber saying "He's accusing me of bank robbery and having $100,000 in my house. He's got to produce the $100,000, but you can't go in my house and look and see if it's there. Just take my word. I don't have the money!"
Click to expand...

Perfect analogy. :)
 
Bo-4 said:
That would be unprovable. Willard's contention that he's above board and Reid's accusation can easily be proved one way or another.. by Willard. Even you know that Lupe.
Click to expand...

Why doesn't Reid get his unnamed source hooked up with the IRS. They are the appropriate agency for determining these kind of things. Not that goofy looking Harry Reid and his unnamed sources using their lapdog media folks.


You just keep up with your diversionary charade it will keep you out of the way of adults trying to do something positive for a change
 
NightSwimmer said:
What makes you think he won't?
All Mitt has to do is file suit to settle this. Either that, or produce his tax records.
Pretty simple, really.
Click to expand...

Why should Romney even bother with ankle biting leg humping chihuahuas like Reid and his unnamed source. If there is any credibility the IRS will be all over it.Hell I got audited over cashing in some stock options because the bank reported the transaction incorrectly and it was only a 14K transaction it turned out the IRS owed me $9.00 I am sure with the $$ involved Romney will get a much closer look The use of the media in this is just a typical leftist character attack indicating a real concern that Obama's reelection is in jeopardy
 
No Lupe, this won't go away until we get a look his taxes all the way back to 2000. His Dad set that standard and now he's stuck with it.

You should hook up with the LONG list of RWers calling on him to release them. It's not just us my friend.

lupehernandezdepedajack said:
Why doesn't Reid get his unnamed source hooked up with the IRS. They are the appropriate agency for determining these kind of things. Not that goofy looking Harry Reid and his unnamed sources using their lapdog media folks.


You just keep up with your diversionary charade it will keep you out of the way of adults trying to do something positive for a change
Click to expand...
 
lupehernandezdepedajack said:
Why should Romeny even bother with ankle biting leg humping chihuahuas like Reid and his unnamed source. If there is any credibility the IRS will be all over it.Hell I got audited over cashing in some stock options because the bank reported the transaction incorrectly and it was only a 14K transaction it turned out the IRS owed me $9.00 I am sure with the $$ involved Romney will get a much closer look The use of the media in this is just a typical leftist character attack indicating a real concern that Obama's reelection is in jeopardy
Click to expand...

Romney admitted to having been audited just the other day. Nobody has accused Mitt of a crime -- only of having paid no taxes. That's quite legal if you have good enough accountants.
 
Lefty likes to not rember how this works...the burden of proof is on the accuser...You say he did something wrong now prove it.

lefty does has problems with basic Jurisprudence, basic accounting principles, the Constitution...they just really havent worked for any of these things..they just expect they get what they want.
 
Drumcollie said:
Lefty likes to not rember how this works...the burden of proof is on the accuser...You say he did something wrong now prove it.

lefty does has problems with basic Jurisprudence, basic accounting principles, the Constitution...they just really havent worked for any of these things..they just expect they get what they want.
Click to expand...

Reid has already proved it -- by Mitt's silence.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top