New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Starbucks to Hire 10,000 Refugees Instead of American Citizens

This is the EXACT mindset that baffles me. Liberals run on emotion. Not logic, or reason. Emotion.

In effect, they're like little kids.
 
I only caught the end of it, but I heard that someplace is also offering them free homes. I wonder if our homeless vets could use them?
 
Corruptbuddha said:
This is the EXACT mindset that baffles me. Liberals run on emotion. Not logic, or reason. Emotion.

In effect, they're like little kids.
Click to expand...

At least there is now a pro-American president in the White House who is more concerned about American citizens prosperity/safety, than those of illegals and Muslim refugees.
 
worldlymrb said:
Dem compassion is limited to foreigners and illegal immigrants. If you are a US citizen, there is no need to apply.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortne...-announces-its-hiring-10000-refugees-n2278567
Click to expand...

Haha! It's been 5+ years since I set foot in a Starborg's. Now, I won't even be able to park in front of one.

000860224_prevstill.jpeg
 
worldlymrb said:
Dem compassion is limited to foreigners and illegal immigrants. If you are a US citizen, there is no need to apply.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortne...-announces-its-hiring-10000-refugees-n2278567
Click to expand...
That's good to hear. Taking in refugees is a good and humane thing to to, but if you don't integrate them successfully into your society, you're just asking for trouble. It's good to see an effort to make sure they get integrated quickly and start contributing to the economy.
 
Arkady said:
That's good to hear. Taking in refugees is a good and humane thing to to, but if you don't integrate them successfully into your society, you're just asking for trouble. It's good to see an effort to make sure they get integrated quickly and start contributing to the economy.
Click to expand...

How has "taking care of refugees" been good for Europe as women and children are being raped by the thousands? Or, will it somehow be different this time?

If you care about the refugees, then you will support Trumps plan to build REFUGEE CAMPS inside Syria to help them rebuild their country after 8 years of Obama's Regime Change Terror fiasco.

REF:

Germany's Migrant Rape Crisis Spirals out of Control - Gatestone Institute
Gatestone Institute › germany-migrants-r...
Aug 9, 2016 - Germany's migrant rape crisis has now spread to cities and towns in all 16 of ... were German nationals, when in fact they were Muslim migrants.

Migrants linked to 69,000 would-be or actual crimes in Germany in first three months ...
Reuters › article › us-europe-migrants-ge...
AMP - Jun 8, 2016 - Migrants in Germany committed or tried to commit some 69000 crimes in the first quarter of 2016, according to a ...

Woman welcomes Muslim 'refugee' into home, gets raped - WND.com
WND.com › 2016/05 › woman-welcome...
May 31, 2016 - In fact, Muslim migrants raping those trying to help them is not that ... in the Palestinian territories and in refugee camps across Europe are never ...
 
Last edited:
Arkady said:
That's good to hear. Taking in refugees is a good and humane thing to to, but if you don't integrate them successfully into your society, you're just asking for trouble. It's good to see an effort to make sure they get integrated quickly and start contributing to the economy.
Click to expand...

It is that.

On the flip side, what would it be labeled if a Starbucks-like corporation openly announced that they would be hiring X amount of only citizens of the US who were born here?

Wasn't it you who had a post about hypocrisy earlier? Would it be considered hypocritical to accept, defend and promote the discriminating against people based upon their national origin in this situation and bitch, moan, piss and cry about doing the exact same thing in reverse in other situations?

I will go with you either way, your call. Can we, or can we not, openly state we will be hiring only people based upon their national origin.

Pick ONE.
 
worldlymrb said:
How has "taking care of refugees" been good for Europe as women and children are being raped by the thousands? Or, will it somehow be different this time?
Click to expand...

So far it's going pretty well:

http://www.dw.com/en/report-refugees-have-not-increased-crime-rate-in-germany/a-18848890

You'd do well be be skeptical about disreputable right-wing propaganda factories like the Gatestone Institute. It's run by disgraced Bush-leaguer John Bolton.

Report: refugees have not increased crime rate in Germany

If you care about the refugees, then you will support Trumps plan to build REFUGEE CAMPS inside Syria to help them rebuild their country after 8 years of Obama's Regime Change Terror fiasco.
Click to expand...

The problem with trying to deal with this with refugee camps within Syria is that it requires a massive commitment of American military resources to protect those safe zones and the supply lines for them. We'd be talking about placing thousands of American troops in harm's way, and expending billions of dollars, and we'd be putting ourselves in the kind of situation that, in the past, has escalated and pulled us into wider involvement. We'd just be asking for a Gulf of Tonkin kind of incident to suck us into a full scale war. Meanwhile, those refugees would be kept in a horrible state indefinitely, where they cannot begin to build new lives and contribute again to a society. Better to let them move to other countries and begin again.
 
UPNYA2 said:
It is that.

On the flip side, what would it be labeled if a Starbucks-like corporation openly announced that they would be hiring X amount of only citizens of the US who were born here?

Wasn't it you who had a post about hypocrisy earlier? Would it be considered hypocritical to accept, defend and promote the discriminating against people based upon their national origin in this situation and bitch, moan, piss and cry about doing the exact same thing in reverse in other situations?

I will go with you either way, your call. Can we, or can we not, openly state we will be hiring only people based upon their national origin.

Pick ONE.
Click to expand...
No. Discrimination, obviously, isn't symmetrical. There's a fundamental difference between further advantaging an already-advantaged group, versus offsetting some of the disadvantage of a disadvantaged group.
 
Arkady said:
That's good to hear. Taking in refugees is a good and humane thing to to, but if you don't integrate them successfully into your society, you're just asking for trouble. It's good to see an effort to make sure they get integrated quickly and start contributing to the economy.
Click to expand...
What about helping people already here?
 
does this mean that 10,000 actual US citizens are going to be let go by starbucks, to make room for refugee workers?

or that starbucks is building 1,000 new stores, and staffing them with 10 refugees each, or a "zero percent" USA content experience for those who hate our nation?
 
Arkady said:
That's good to hear. Taking in refugees is a good and humane thing to to, but if you don't integrate them successfully into your society, you're just asking for trouble. It's good to see an effort to make sure they get integrated quickly and start contributing to the economy.
Click to expand...

They consider you an Infidel and hate your suits................

Soon Starbucks will be no more and all Muslims should be sent to your city, especially ones as this:

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2736768/quebec-city-mosque-shooting-students-arrested/
 
as seen on tv said:
does this mean that 10,000 actual US citizens are going to be let go by starbucks, to make room for refugee workers?

or that starbucks is building 1,000 new stores, and staffing them with 10 refugees each, or a "zero percent" USA content experience for those who hate our nation?
Click to expand...


progs dont do math...

[nor history, science, or logic]
 
Arkady said:
No. Discrimination, obviously, isn't symmetrical. There's a fundamental difference between further advantaging an already-advantaged group, versus offsetting some of the disadvantage of a disadvantaged group.
Click to expand...


I said, "pick ONE", not both, depending on how someone "feels".

But, yeah, I get ya. "Discrimination" is defined as such depending strictly upon how a liberal feels about those involved.

Gotta love that di m "logic". (for lack of a better word.)

Or will you champion everyone accepting MY definition of discrimination", MY idea of who is a disadvantaged or "an already advantaged" group as you seek to have done here based upon YOUR feelings on the matter?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top