colfax
Council Member
Still, in spite of any up-tick from the debates, these GOPpers are still doing deep knee-bends on the ocean floor.
http://electoral-vote.com/
http://electoral-vote.com/
still deep knee-bends - what are these GOPpers gonna do?
- Thread starter colfax
- Start date
colfax
Council Member
I guess these GOPpers all have RODS (rightie, orgasmic reality denial syndrome). I wonder if their RODS will morph into another malady as they go to bed with all the networks calling the election for Obama?
colfax
Council Member
There, I was looking for the quote from that site for this thread, and finally found it.
Despite Mitt Romney's post-debate bump, the fundamentals of the presidential race have not changed.
Everything comes down to six big swing states (Florida, Ohio, North Carolina, Virginia, Wisconsin, and Colorado) as well as three smaller ones (Nevada, Iowa, and New Hampshire). The result is a race in which both campaigns are ignoring 41 states. Romney's path to the White House is still very limited. He has to win Florida, Ohio, North Carolina, and probably Virginia to get to 270. If Obama hangs onto Wisconsin--a traditionally blue state--and wins the two western swing states, both of which are historically trending blue, he needs only one of the four biggest swing states. Currently, he [Obama] still has a substantial lead in Ohio, without which no Republican has ever been elected President.
GordonGecko
President
They'll cite Rasmussen....when it comes to party affiliation...but not on his national "Romney vs Obama" numbers.
They'll cite Gallup....when it comes to independent voters.....but not on its national "Romney vs Obama" numbers.
They'll cite two goobers from Colorado who claim to have "predicted every election since 1980" (when the two guys weren't even grad students).....but IGNORE Nate Silver who has predicted correctly Presidential and Congressional elections for years.
They'll say "ALL the polls are skewed and oversample Democrats. Ignore them, Liberal Media bias".....unless they show Romney UP after the 1st Debate.
They claim "Romney is a shoo-in"....but NOT ONE of them has bet any of their MONEY on that "certainty".
They'll cite Gallup....when it comes to independent voters.....but not on its national "Romney vs Obama" numbers.
They'll cite two goobers from Colorado who claim to have "predicted every election since 1980" (when the two guys weren't even grad students).....but IGNORE Nate Silver who has predicted correctly Presidential and Congressional elections for years.
They'll say "ALL the polls are skewed and oversample Democrats. Ignore them, Liberal Media bias".....unless they show Romney UP after the 1st Debate.
They claim "Romney is a shoo-in"....but NOT ONE of them has bet any of their MONEY on that "certainty".
colfax
Council Member
The bookies in London (bookmaking on Presidential elections illegal in the US) are offering attractive very books for anyone willing to bet on Romney, but none of these GOPpers will avail themselves of that easy way to get rich if Romney wins.
Instead, they prefer harping about their certainty Romney is gonna win on PJ
http://www.smartmoney.com/invest/strategies/romney-vs-obama-the-oddsmakers-weigh-in-1344372024237/
