New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Sudden silence on Hillary's poll numbers post the sham Benghazi hearing.

Silence is golden... lol, their hearing backfired big time. Lots of good benefits re Hillary's poll numbers, thanks to Gowdy and his pals.

What's that saying, he who laughs last, laughs best. :)

Trey Gowdy Just Elected Hillary Clinton President
Thursday's asinine Benghazi hearing solved every major one of candidate Clinton’s strategic problems
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/trey-gowdy-just-elected-hillary-clinton-president-20151023
Republicans' 11-Hour Gift to Hillary Clinton
Conservatives on the Benghazi committee practically picked Clinton up and carried her toward the White House
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/republicans-11-hour-gift-to-hillary-clinton-20151023
 
benghazi was a distraction...slight of hand..a useful diversion..

it would be foolish to bring the big guns to bear so far from the election...[voters having such short memories]..the pugs are not stupid..it would be a mistake to underestimate their resolve....

sometimes the best hiding place is in plain sight...
 
oicu812 said:
benghazi was a distraction...slight of hand..a useful diversion..

it would be foolish to bring the big guns to bear so far from the election...[voters having such short memories]..the pugs are not stupid..it would be a mistake to underestimate their resolve....

sometimes the best hiding place is in plain sight...
Click to expand...

Are you kidding me. They've gotten everything wrong in there long term planning. They thought this would be the knock blow that would pave their way for the WH. Just like they thought creating the Tea Party Monster was a good idea until TrumpZilla took over control of it. Now they are scrambling to deal with both of these idiotic decisions.
 
oicu812 said:
the pugs are not stupid..it would be a mistake to underestimate their resolve....
Click to expand...

Well, their scandal making political strategies have proven to be a bust so far...
Great wrap-up line by the writer on the link I gave, above.

The Republicans wanted Hillary Clinton's head mounted on a wall, and they'll get it. At this rate, barring something truly remarkable by Bernie Sanders, it will probably come in the form of her official presidential photo.
 
Spamature said:
Well let me step in and help out with the updates that stopped for some mysterious reason as soon as Gowdy was put in his place by the former senator and secretary of state.




Iowa Democratic Presidential Caucus Monmouth Clinton 65, Sanders 24, O'Malley 5 Clinton +41
Iowa Democratic Presidential Caucus Loras College Clinton 62, Sanders 24, O'Malley 3 Clinton +38
Click to expand...

No, it's not Biden dropping out of the race nor the debate she supposedly did well in- it's the Benghazi hearing!!

ROFLMAO!
 
The Thinker said:
No, it's not Biden dropping out of the race nor the debate she supposedly did well in- it's the Benghazi hearing!!

ROFLMAO!
Click to expand...

I need not repeat what elected Republicans said. But you guys sure gave Benghazi the credit for her poll numbers going into that hearing.
 
Spamature said:
Well let me step in and help out with the updates that stopped for some mysterious reason as soon as Gowdy was put in his place by the former senator and secretary of state.




Iowa Democratic Presidential Caucus Monmouth Clinton 65, Sanders 24, O'Malley 5 Clinton +41
Iowa Democratic Presidential Caucus Loras College Clinton 62, Sanders 24, O'Malley 3 Clinton +38
Click to expand...
I think that has more to do with Biden bailin' than Clinton winnin'. Still, it's clear she's the favorite among Democratic voters but it's the Independents who will determine who's President. http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/clin...ts-independents-table-turns/story?id=34425648

Did you see where Carson surged ahead of Trump??? Bush is trailing 7% among Republican voters. Better start saving your pennies, @Spamature. ;)

http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/27/politics/ben-carson-donald-trump-cbs-poll/
Carson won the support of 26% of Republican primary voters, compared to 22% who are backing Trump, according to CBS News/New York Times. Though within the poll's margin of error, it marks the first time since the billionaire businessman's dominant rise over the summer where he has been bumped from the top spot nationally....

.....CBS/New York Times pollsters found Carson outpacing Trump among women and evangelicals and running even with him among men. Trump performed better with moderate Republicans and voters without college degrees.

No other candidate cracked double-digit support in the latest poll. Marco Rubio won 8% support, Jeb Bush and Carly Fiorina tied for fourth place with 7 percent and Mike Huckabee, Rand Paul, Ted Cruz and John Kasich each got 4%.
 
Max R. said:
I think that has more to do with Biden bailin' than Clinton winnin'. Still, it's clear she's the favorite among Democratic voters but it's the Independents who will determine who's President. http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/clin...ts-independents-table-turns/story?id=34425648

Did you see where Carson surged ahead of Trump??? Bush is trailing 7% among Republican voters. Better start saving your pennies, @Spamature. ;)

http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/27/politics/ben-carson-donald-trump-cbs-poll/
Carson won the support of 26% of Republican primary voters, compared to 22% who are backing Trump, according to CBS News/New York Times. Though within the poll's margin of error, it marks the first time since the billionaire businessman's dominant rise over the summer where he has been bumped from the top spot nationally....

.....CBS/New York Times pollsters found Carson outpacing Trump among women and evangelicals and running even with him among men. Trump performed better with moderate Republicans and voters without college degrees.

No other candidate cracked double-digit support in the latest poll. Marco Rubio won 8% support, Jeb Bush and Carly Fiorina tied for fourth place with 7 percent and Mike Huckabee, Rand Paul, Ted Cruz and John Kasich each got 4%.
Click to expand...

it's the Independents who will determine who's President


Not in a primary they don't.
 
Spamature said:
it's the Independents who will determine who's President


Not in a primary they don't.
Click to expand...
Uh, primaries don't elect Presidents, they just nominate party candidates.
You might want to read up on the process before making any more political bets.
smiley-cool14.gif


Obviously with the choice of Hillary (it's her turn, after all) and a Socialist beanie hat wearer, the Democrats will probably nominate Hillary.
 
Max R. said:
Uh, primaries don't elect Presidents, they just nominate party candidates.
You might want to read up on the process before making any more political bets.
smiley-cool14.gif


Obviously with the choice of Hillary (it's her turn, after all) and a Socialist beanie hat wearer, the Democrats will probably nominate Hillary.
Click to expand...
Good, you accept your fate in the first half of the bet. I know that Benghazi nonsense had your hope riding high. Now if Jughead can get his act together you will see your folly. Although I am starting to doubt that this idiot has the common sense it takes to shut up and let his party nominate him instead of the penchant for self sabotage the dummy is showing.
 
Anyone have a more current poll? http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-dr...ability-ratings-are-right-their-normal-groove
Greg Sargent says that Hillary Clinton's tanking favorability ratings should take no one by surprise. It's what happens every time an election starts up and she's once again viewed as a partisan political figure. "Her drop was probably inevitable once she made the transition from Secretary of State — a job that carries the trappings of above-politics statesmanship, or if you prefer, states-womanship — to candidate for president."

There's much more at the link, but the annotated chart below pretty much tells the story. When she's removed from the fray, her unfavorability ratings bounce around between 20 and 40 percent. When she's involved in an election, they go up to 45-55 percent or even a little higher. The same thing is happening this time around.
blog_hillary_clinton_unfavorability_0.jpg
 
Spamature said:
Good, you accept your fate in the first half of the bet. I know that Benghazi nonsense had your hope riding high. Now if Jughead can get his act together you will see your folly. Although I am starting to doubt that this idiot has the common sense it takes to shut up and let his party nominate him instead of the penchant for self sabotage the dummy is showing.
Click to expand...
Fate? Is that your way of hinting you won't pay up if it's not Clinton-Bush as the nominees? I figured as much.
 
Max R. said:
Anyone have a more current poll? http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-dr...ability-ratings-are-right-their-normal-groove
Greg Sargent says that Hillary Clinton's tanking favorability ratings should take no one by surprise. It's what happens every time an election starts up and she's once again viewed as a partisan political figure. "Her drop was probably inevitable once she made the transition from Secretary of State — a job that carries the trappings of above-politics statesmanship, or if you prefer, states-womanship — to candidate for president."

There's much more at the link, but the annotated chart below pretty much tells the story. When she's removed from the fray, her unfavorability ratings bounce around between 20 and 40 percent. When she's involved in an election, they go up to 45-55 percent or even a little higher. The same thing is happening this time around.
blog_hillary_clinton_unfavorability_0.jpg
Click to expand...
Did you realize you linked a SEPTEMBER 2nd article? Why would that be "current news?"
 
oicu812 said:
benghazi was a distraction...slight of hand..a useful diversion..

it would be foolish to bring the big guns to bear so far from the election...[voters having such short memories]..the pugs are not stupid..it would be a mistake to underestimate their resolve....

sometimes the best hiding place is in plain sight...
Click to expand...
Of course Benghazi was a distraction and a slight of hand. We've been saying there's no there there all along and that it was just typical Republican spaghetti-throwing at the wall to see if it sticks. Nice to see you admitting what has been obvious since the beginning of the faux Benghazi 'scandal.' Reading on this board, however, many, if not most, Cons still believe the diversion/slight of hand. LOL. Easily duped, just like the RNC knew they would be. Sadly for you, there's no grand plan to bring out the big guns later on; that's just wishful thinking on your part. Well, that and "it would be a mistake to underestimate their resolve," because all they will have, all they have ever had, is more faux outrage and outrageous lies. But they know Cons will fall for it, they always do.
 
Hillary Clinton will roll like a tidal wave over these Republican Ass Holes...Watch and see
 
NinaS said:
Did you realize you linked a SEPTEMBER 2nd article? Why would that be "current news?"
Click to expand...
I asked "Anyone have a more current poll?" Did you miss that part in your rush to bitch about my post???


Since we're on the subject, what is the appropriate maximum age of an article in your opinion? Does that age differ if it's favorable/unfavorable to the Left or Right?

@NinaS , Will you hold LWers responsible for posting articles dated the previous month with the same vigor you hold me?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top