New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

T-Shirt Causes Outrage....

Craig

Senator
Supporting Member
A company has recently designed a t-shirt that has some folks OUTRAGED! OUTRAGED, I tell ya....

So...which image was it that has folks up in arms?

NoMoreHeros-Satire-Painting.jpg


gallery2347_1.jpg


A02z_014_gay-flag.jpg


051715_ff_shirt_640.jpg


iwo.jima.parody.oil.jpg
 
I find none of the pics outrages or offensive. However one was kinda funny.

I don't find any of them outrageous or offensive in the slightest, but there is an outcry...and the t-shirt has been removed from retail and the manufacturer apologized for it.
 
It's the one with the basketball hoop....I heard something about it this morning. I'm just not sure why. I see a lot of shirts that are offensive, so I wouldn't purchase them.
 
Sure.

It doesn't bother me what the company decides to do. It's their company.

I don't see how that addresses the top post. It was about the outrage regarding one of those images, not the response of the company.
 
;)
It's the one with the basketball hoop....I heard something about it this morning. I'm just not sure why. I see a lot of shirts that are offensive, so I wouldn't purchase them.

CLEARLY it's the one with the basketball hoop. If you look closely, you'll see that the "players"
pants are hanging down to their knees, and their asses are hanging out... Very realistic, btw.

However, some people take offense at this grossness, as is their right.;):D
 
I don't see how that addresses the top post. It was about the outrage regarding one of those images, not the response of the company.
There really isn't a lot to discuss in the top post. Someone, somewhere, was offended by one of these images, but we don't know which and we don't know why.

Is your next post going to be someone somewhere having a something somehow happen to them?
 
I don't see how that addresses the top post. It was about the outrage regarding one of those images, not the response of the company.


You said this in response to my post:

Offend? No. I find it an entirely unnecessary move on the company's part, but it doesn't offend.



So I commented on what you said.

So far I've not been offended. I'm sorry if that's not what you're fishing for.

Likely Under Armor thought this Tee-shirt would make them money. When there was a backlash, they may have concluded it might have the opposite effect, and pulled the product. That's normal business practice.

As for those that had a negative reaction to the product, they certainly have that right, and I'm not offended by them either.

Not what you're looking for? You'll get over it. have a Blessed day.
 
Some people can find offense in just about anything....

This is an extremely parodied and utilized image. That's the sole concept here. We see it used for advertising and political purposes on a regular basis, yet this t-shirt brought out a weird sort of outrage.

Just two examples...

Cloyd Rivers Pics @CloydRiversPics
Seriously @UnderArmour? 6,281 men didn't die at Iwo Jima so you could sell a "Band of Ballers" t-shirt. Merica.

12:12 PM - 17 May 2015

Anthony White @AnthonyWhiteTX
@UnderArmour this is disgusting and a slap in the face to my fellow #Marines. "Band of Ballers" shirt? Such a shame

10:15 AM - 16 May 2015

http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...rry-iwo-jima-band--ballers-military/27505837/
 
You said this in response to my post:

Offend? No. I find it an entirely unnecessary move on the company's part, but it doesn't offend.



So I commented on what you said.

So far I've not been offended. I'm sorry if that's not what you're fishing for.

Likely Under Armor thought this Tee-shirt would make them money. When there was a backlash, they may have concluded it might have the opposite effect, and pulled the product. That's normal business practice.

As for those that had a negative reaction to the product, they certainly have that right, and I'm not offended by them either.

Not what you're looking for? You'll get over it. have a Blessed day.

Why must you always approach from a point of personal contention?

The right of anyone is not under discussion...Apparently, there can be no discussion on any issue. There were any number of paths one could wander down here...and as the tp was rather vague, that path was chosen solely by the respondents.

I found the outrage, the response to a commonly parodied and utilized photo, to be absurd. What makes the UA shirt any worse or any more offensive than any of the others uses of the photo? All you offer is: they have the right. Yes...yes, they do...and no one ever said, implied, or inferred otherwise. All involved have all rights. UA can make and sell...or not the t-shirt. People can whine and moan about the disrespect. Got it.

Now that the understood basics that serve as a distraction to the subject have been laid out...Why does this t-shirt deserve such opprobrium?
 
There really isn't a lot to discuss in the top post. Someone, somewhere, was offended by one of these images, but we don't know which and we don't know why.

Is your next post going to be someone somewhere having a something somehow happen to them?


Yes...I left out the story for a reason. I was curious to see if the image currently under discussion could be differentiated from others using the same image as an inspiration.
 
I believe there is a message in the picture of the military men holding up the oil rig thing. Kind of symbolic, unfortunately.
 
;)

CLEARLY it's the one with the basketball hoop. If you look closely, you'll see that the "players"
pants are hanging down to their knees, and their asses are hanging out... Very realistic, btw.

However, some people take offense at this grossness, as is their right.;):D

Nope....didn't even notice that. I see how they are standing but I didn't take it as offensive really. There's many other things more important to be offended by than a picture on a t-shirt. I've seen some pretty horrible things printed on them and nobody says a word.
 
Nope....didn't even notice that. I see how they are standing but I didn't take it as offensive really. There's many other things more important to be offended by than a picture on a t-shirt. I've seen some pretty horrible things printed on them and nobody says a word.

LOL... trust me, I'm not offended at any of them. I think it's hilarious that some people have the time, energy, and lack of LIFE to be offended at something like that.

I'm just trying to figure out what they're offended BY... and then I noticed the guy in the middle. His pants are clearly below his knees, and his butt may or may not be hanging out...

Anyway, that's the only thing I could think of that might to offensive to some. :D;)
 
Why must you always approach from a point of personal contention?

The right of anyone is not under discussion...Apparently, there can be no discussion on any issue. There were any number of paths one could wander down here...and as the tp was rather vague, that path was chosen solely by the respondents.

I found the outrage, the response to a commonly parodied and utilized photo, to be absurd. What makes the UA shirt any worse or any more offensive than any of the others uses of the photo? All you offer is: they have the right. Yes...yes, they do...and no one ever said, implied, or inferred otherwise. All involved have all rights. UA can make and sell...or not the t-shirt. People can whine and moan about the disrespect. Got it.

Now that the understood basics that serve as a distraction to the subject have been laid out...Why does this t-shirt deserve such opprobrium?


Ask yourself why you give it so much attention.
 
Back
Top