THE DEATH OF AMERICA

[Truthiseternal1]

THE DEATH OF AMERICA was enacted in 1965 with the signing of the Open Immigration Law Of 1965.
While serving Jewish interests, the Open Immigration Law Of 1965 was the beginning of America’s death as a unified nation. Jews were behind the law, promoting, lobbying, and “bribing” the law into existence with the fanaticism equalling the most dedicated Muslim terrorist.
Jews have continually evinced hostility toward American Christian culture in their aggressive efforts to change it. The Open Immigration Law Of 1965 is a prime example of that hostility.
Jews are a paranoid people. Wherever the Jews go they fear Anti-Semitism. (Jews have a guilt complex - and for good reason.) Jews fear a homogenous Christian culture of which they would never ascend to influential positions.
A typical example of what characterizes the Jewish push for open immigration can be seen in the following 1948 quote by David Petegorsky, former Director of the AJCongress:
“Jewish survival can only take place within the framework of a progressive and expanding democratic society, which through its institutions and public policies gives expression to the concept of cultural pluralism.”
Here Are The Names Of The Jews Behind The Open Immigraton Law of 1965:
1. Senator Jacob Javits (NY)
2. Congressman Emanuel Celler (NY)
3. Leo Pfeffer (Former President of
American Jewish Congress (AJC)
4. Norman Podhoretz (Writer and Member of The Council of Foreign Relations)
* Senator Jacob Javits played a prominent role in the Senate hearings on the 1965 bill. Javits authored an article entitled ‘Let’s open the gates’ that proposed immigration levels of 500,000 per year for 20 years with no restrictions on national origin.
* Congressman Emanuel Celler, who fought for unrestricted immigration for over 40 years in the House of Representatives, introduced similar legislation resulting in the “Cellar-Hart Immigration Bill,” the precursor to the fatal bill of 1965.
* Leo Pfeffer, a so-called, “Jewish Intellect,” (translate, “Christ-Hater”), wrote many treaties and books that propagandized for open immigration.
* Norman Podhoretz, a former leftist, now a Jewish “neo-con,” (he’s still a leftist), also wrote many articles promoting open immigration.
* Jewish organizations such as the American Jewish Congress, The Jewish Federation, the ACLU, and the B’nai B’rith, AIOAC, SPLC (there is no end to their organizations), filed briefs in support of open immigration before the Senate Subcommittee in the early sixties leading up to the passing of the 1965 law.
THE 1965 OPEN IMMIGRATION LAW IS PRESENTLY fulfilling the aims of the Jewish conspiracy as seen in its effects. The U.S. Census Bureau projects that by the year 2050, European-derived peoples will no longer be a majority of the population of America due to the massive influx of immigrants since the signing of the bill in 1965.
Most of these immigrants come from Third World Nations whose customs, religions, and culture are far removed from anything remotely resembling Christianity. Within the context of a Jewish-informed “multicultural America,” these immigrants are encouraged by the Jews to retain their own languages, customs, and religions.
The Jews have also given these immigrants a moral mandate to expand both demographically and politically. And expand they will and do! But any attempts by European-derived peoples to retain demographic, political, and cultural control in America are represented by the Jews as being ‘racist’ and ‘immoral.’

These policies must be reversed or the USA, and the white race will cease to exist in the near future.

 

[BobbyT]

THE DEATH OF AMERICA was enacted in 1965 with the signing of the Open Immigration Law Of 1965.
While serving Jewish interests, the Open Immigration Law Of 1965 was the beginning of America’s death as a unified nation. Jews were behind the law, promoting, lobbying, and “bribing” the law into existence with the fanaticism equalling the most dedicated Muslim terrorist.
Jews have continually evinced hostility toward American Christian culture in their aggressive efforts to change it. The Open Immigration Law Of 1965 is a prime example of that hostility.
Jews are a paranoid people. Wherever the Jews go they fear Anti-Semitism. (Jews have a guilt complex - and for good reason.) Jews fear a homogenous Christian culture of which they would never ascend to influential positions.
A typical example of what characterizes the Jewish push for open immigration can be seen in the following 1948 quote by David Petegorsky, former Director of the AJCongress:
“Jewish survival can only take place within the framework of a progressive and expanding democratic society, which through its institutions and public policies gives expression to the concept of cultural pluralism.”
Here Are The Names Of The Jews Behind The Open Immigraton Law of 1965:
1. Senator Jacob Javits (NY)
2. Congressman Emanuel Celler (NY)
3. Leo Pfeffer (Former President of
American Jewish Congress (AJC)
4. Norman Podhoretz (Writer and Member of The Council of Foreign Relations)
* Senator Jacob Javits played a prominent role in the Senate hearings on the 1965 bill. Javits authored an article entitled ‘Let’s open the gates’ that proposed immigration levels of 500,000 per year for 20 years with no restrictions on national origin.
* Congressman Emanuel Celler, who fought for unrestricted immigration for over 40 years in the House of Representatives, introduced similar legislation resulting in the “Cellar-Hart Immigration Bill,” the precursor to the fatal bill of 1965.
* Leo Pfeffer, a so-called, “Jewish Intellect,” (translate, “Christ-Hater”), wrote many treaties and books that propagandized for open immigration.
* Norman Podhoretz, a former leftist, now a Jewish “neo-con,” (he’s still a leftist), also wrote many articles promoting open immigration.
* Jewish organizations such as the American Jewish Congress, The Jewish Federation, the ACLU, and the B’nai B’rith, AIOAC, SPLC (there is no end to their organizations), filed briefs in support of open immigration before the Senate Subcommittee in the early sixties leading up to the passing of the 1965 law.
THE 1965 OPEN IMMIGRATION LAW IS PRESENTLY fulfilling the aims of the Jewish conspiracy as seen in its effects. The U.S. Census Bureau projects that by the year 2050, European-derived peoples will no longer be a majority of the population of America due to the massive influx of immigrants since the signing of the bill in 1965.
Most of these immigrants come from Third World Nations whose customs, religions, and culture are far removed from anything remotely resembling Christianity. Within the context of a Jewish-informed “multicultural America,” these immigrants are encouraged by the Jews to retain their own languages, customs, and religions.
The Jews have also given these immigrants a moral mandate to expand both demographically and politically. And expand they will and do! But any attempts by European-derived peoples to retain demographic, political, and cultural control in America are represented by the Jews as being ‘racist’ and ‘immoral.’

These policies must be reversed or the USA, and the white race will cease to exist in the near future.

If the "white race" has to fear and push aside others to continue to exist, perhaps its ceasing to exist would be a good thing. As a white person, I am not frightened by others living around me and speaking their own language and having their own customs and religions. In fact, I find it interesting. Living in the Great Southwest, I am surrounded by Mexican and other Hispanic cultures and have incorporated some of them into my own. Posole at Christmas, for example, is one of the best parts of the holiday for me. As is setting out lumenarias instead of Christmas lights. The multicultural aspect of the US is its greatest treasure. The US doesn't belong to "European-derived" peoples. It belongs to US citizens of whatever derivation, Jews included.

 

[LanceFreeman]

The Top Post is on the mark. Very accurate in its analysis of the problem, its genesis, and conclusions. While it is interesting to have some variety in a society in terms of culture, it is insane to flood the country with peoples of all cultures, religions, races, and nationalities without aforethought or discipline, and to the point where society is no longer homogeneous in make-up, outlook, or trajectory. A nation fragmented along ethnic, national, racial, and religious lines cannot stand, and will not stand. A nation so fragmented is headed toward oblivion.

And that is where we are today, thanks to the destructive Zion Jews. All of these ills they wish for us, but reject wholeheartedly inside their own homeland, Israel. After all, they are not stupid---like the stupid Goyim, who care not what creature takes up residence in their house, or who helps himself to their possessions.

For the past 70 years, the White Christian Man has been played for a fool:

Click here: Jews want your Nation Destroyed by Race Mixing But Punish Race Mixing Jews - YouTube

Click here: America Destroyed by Jews - YouTube

 

[BobbyT]

The Top Post is on the mark. Very accurate in its analysis of the problem, its genesis, and conclusions. While it is interesting to have some variety in a society in terms of culture, it is insane to flood the country with peoples of all cultures, religions, races, and nationalities without aforethought or discipline, and to the point where society is no longer homogeneous in make-up, outlook, or trajectory. A nation fragmented along ethnic, national, racial, and religious lines cannot stand, and will not stand. A nation so fragmented is headed toward oblivion.

And that is where we are today, thanks to the destructive Zion Jews. All of these ills they wish for us, but reject wholeheartedly inside their own homeland, Israel. After all, they are not stupid---like the stupid Goyim, who care not what creature takes up residence in their house, or who helps himself to their possessions.

For the past 70 years, the White Christian Man has been played for a fool:

Click here: Jews want your Nation Destroyed by Race Mixing But Punish Race Mixing Jews - YouTube

Click here: America Destroyed by Jews - YouTube

We were never homogeneous. I have no problem with "race mixing" and I find it bizarre that anyone does.

 

[LanceFreeman]

We were never homogeneous. I have no problem with "race mixing" and I find it bizarre that anyone does.

Tell that to the Jews. Race mixing is not harmful if the protagonists are of the same mind, of the same level of consciousness, and share the same values and goals in life. Not a problem at a basic level. It becomes a big problem when these goals, values, objectives, and visions clash and run counter to one another. Foe example, one group wants Sharia Law incorporated into the laws of the land, but another group is vehemently against it. One group wants to impose the Jewish Noahide Laws on the citizens of America, while the Christian majority finds it offensive to an extreme, an affront to our way of life, and a blatant effort by Talmudic Jews to destroy Christianity.

Btw, the Noahide Laws have been ratified by our Congress and are now the law of the land. They have just not been enforced yet--waiting for us to slide further into the NWO quicksand before the Jews will feel confident enough to enforce it.

 

[Dino]

THE DEATH OF AMERICA was enacted in 1965 with the signing of the Open Immigration Law Of 1965.
While serving Jewish interests, the Open Immigration Law Of 1965 was the beginning of America’s death as a unified nation. Jews were behind the law, promoting, lobbying, and “bribing” the law into existence with the fanaticism equalling the most dedicated Muslim terrorist.
Jews have continually evinced hostility toward American Christian culture in their aggressive efforts to change it. The Open Immigration Law Of 1965 is a prime example of that hostility.
Jews are a paranoid people. Wherever the Jews go they fear Anti-Semitism. (Jews have a guilt complex - and for good reason.) Jews fear a homogenous Christian culture of which they would never ascend to influential positions.
A typical example of what characterizes the Jewish push for open immigration can be seen in the following 1948 quote by David Petegorsky, former Director of the AJCongress:
“Jewish survival can only take place within the framework of a progressive and expanding democratic society, which through its institutions and public policies gives expression to the concept of cultural pluralism.”
Here Are The Names Of The Jews Behind The Open Immigraton Law of 1965:
1. Senator Jacob Javits (NY)
2. Congressman Emanuel Celler (NY)
3. Leo Pfeffer (Former President of
American Jewish Congress (AJC)
4. Norman Podhoretz (Writer and Member of The Council of Foreign Relations)
* Senator Jacob Javits played a prominent role in the Senate hearings on the 1965 bill. Javits authored an article entitled ‘Let’s open the gates’ that proposed immigration levels of 500,000 per year for 20 years with no restrictions on national origin.
* Congressman Emanuel Celler, who fought for unrestricted immigration for over 40 years in the House of Representatives, introduced similar legislation resulting in the “Cellar-Hart Immigration Bill,” the precursor to the fatal bill of 1965.
* Leo Pfeffer, a so-called, “Jewish Intellect,” (translate, “Christ-Hater”), wrote many treaties and books that propagandized for open immigration.
* Norman Podhoretz, a former leftist, now a Jewish “neo-con,” (he’s still a leftist), also wrote many articles promoting open immigration.
* Jewish organizations such as the American Jewish Congress, The Jewish Federation, the ACLU, and the B’nai B’rith, AIOAC, SPLC (there is no end to their organizations), filed briefs in support of open immigration before the Senate Subcommittee in the early sixties leading up to the passing of the 1965 law.
THE 1965 OPEN IMMIGRATION LAW IS PRESENTLY fulfilling the aims of the Jewish conspiracy as seen in its effects. The U.S. Census Bureau projects that by the year 2050, European-derived peoples will no longer be a majority of the population of America due to the massive influx of immigrants since the signing of the bill in 1965.
Most of these immigrants come from Third World Nations whose customs, religions, and culture are far removed from anything remotely resembling Christianity. Within the context of a Jewish-informed “multicultural America,” these immigrants are encouraged by the Jews to retain their own languages, customs, and religions.
The Jews have also given these immigrants a moral mandate to expand both demographically and politically. And expand they will and do! But any attempts by European-derived peoples to retain demographic, political, and cultural control in America are represented by the Jews as being ‘racist’ and ‘immoral.’

These policies must be reversed or the USA, and the white race will cease to exist in the near future.

If you feel that way about Jews I can't imagine how you feel about Blacks

 

[LanceFreeman]

If you feel that way about Jews I can't imagine how you feel about Blacks

Your comments are a red herring, a false scent--designed to mislead and deflect. Indicative of a person who (1) fails to grasp the real meaning and impact behind the rationale presented, or (2) is overly besotted of Jews, for whatever reason (perhaps because he is Jewish), or (3) has lived his whole life encased in a propaganda cocoon, and cannot see beyond the point of his nose. You need to travel some, Hoss, and spend time soaking up some knowledge, especially in the area of the Mid-East. Your understanding of things, especially of Jews and Jewish objectives in America, leaves much to be desired. Your nose is too close to the canvas.

Btw, ever since I began posting on PJ a few years back, there has never been a dearth of Israeli (i.e. Jewish) flag wavers here, and you, Dino, were one of the first to pop up.

 

[BobbyT]

Tell that to the Jews. Race mixing is not harmful if the protagonists are of the same mind, of the same level of consciousness, and share the same values and goals in life. Not a problem at a basic level. It becomes a big problem when these goals, values, objectives, and visions clash and run counter to one another. Foe example, one group wants Sharia Law incorporated into the laws of the land, but another group is vehemently against it. One group wants to impose the Jewish Noahide Laws on the citizens of America, while the Christian majority finds it offensive to an extreme, an affront to our way of life, and a blatant effort by Talmudic Jews to destroy Christianity.

Btw, the Noahide Laws have been ratified by our Congress and are now the law of the land. They have just not been enforced yet--waiting for us to slide further into the NWO quicksand before the Jews will feel confident enough to enforce it.

Since I know married couples in which one was Jewish and one not, and can give Ivanka Trump as an example, I know that "race mixing" is not something Jews actively prevent. Too, if a married mixed "race" couple does not share the same goals and values, they will solve that problem or not, as do couples who are not mixed "race" but do not share the same goals and values. Unlike you, I am not afraid of Talmudic laws nor of Sharia law. If they conflict with our laws, they will not stand, If they deal in the realm of the religious, in the same way as Catholic divorce and birth control doctrines, then what's the problem?

BTW, "race" is an artificial construct. There's only one "race" of humans: Cuomo sapiens sapiens. And all humans belong to it.

 

[Saladin2]

Since I know married couples in which one was Jewish and one not, and can give Ivanka Trump as an example, I know that "race mixing" is not something Jews actively prevent. Too, if a married mixed "race" couple does not share the same goals and values, they will solve that problem or not, as do couples who are not mixed "race" but do not share the same goals and values. Unlike you, I am not afraid of Talmudic laws nor of Sharia law. If they conflict with our laws, they will not stand, If they deal in the realm of the religious, in the same way as Catholic divorce and birth control doctrines, then what's the problem?

BTW, "race" is an artificial construct. There's only one "race" of humans: Cuomo sapiens sapiens. And all humans belong to it.

Don't bother with these piece of shit bigots...Just be ready to confront them when the time comes

 

[LanceFreeman]

Since I know married couples in which one was Jewish and one not, and can give Ivanka Trump as an example, I know that "race mixing" is not something Jews actively prevent. Too, if a married mixed "race" couple does not share the same goals and values, they will solve that problem or not, as do couples who are not mixed "race" but do not share the same goals and values. Unlike you, I am not afraid of Talmudic laws nor of Sharia law. If they conflict with our laws, they will not stand, If they deal in the realm of the religious, in the same way as Catholic divorce and birth control doctrines, then what's the problem?

BTW, "race" is an artificial construct. There's only one "race" of humans: Cuomo sapiens sapiens. And all humans belong to it.

There are races, unfortunately; they do exist, no matter how magnanimous you look upon the word 'race'. The word 'race' carries with it a certain culture, way of life, and a certain vision born of backdrop and hundreds of years of life experience. I've certainly experienced these races and cultures throughout the world, so know what I'm talking about. The Aboriginals of Australia versus the Whites who came afterwards are a prime example of the clash of such cultures, vision, and civilization. They also happen to be of different colors (races). Even after a couple of hundred years of living close together, the Aboriginals remain separate in their culture and vision, and assimilate into White culture only painfully.

I am acquainted with the harsh realities of culture clash, and feel sorry for the 'pollyannas' who want so much for things to mesh into their unrealistic Utopia. I was shocked out of such thinking many years ago, for I too had such yearnings when I was younger.

 

[BobbyT]

There are races, unfortunately; they do exist, no matter how magnanimous you look upon the word 'race'. The word 'race' carries with it a certain culture, way of life, and a certain vision born of backdrop and hundreds of years of life experience. I've certainly experienced these races and cultures throughout the world, so know what I'm talking about. The Aboriginals of Australia versus the Whites who came afterwards are a prime example of the clash of such cultures, vision, and civilization. They also happen to be of different colors (races). Even after a couple of hundred years of living close together, the Aboriginals remain separate in their culture and vision, and assimilate into White culture only painfully.

I am acquainted with the harsh realities of culture clash, and feel sorry for the 'pollyannas' who want so much for things to mesh into their unrealistic Utopia. I was shocked out of such thinking many years ago, for I too had such yearnings when I was younger.

Nope, "race" is a social construct, not a scientific one. Sure there are different cultures, just as there are different languages. Always have been, and they are fluid, and that fluidity frequently comes with clashes. Mostly those clashes come from "you have something I want."

No one expects a utopia, such run contrary to how humans (and every other species on the planet) behave. That doesn't mean that fundamentally all humans don't want the same things because we all do, and cultures are just different expressions of those wants: to be safe, to raise our children to adulthood, to have at least a basic standard of living. Our similarities are far more important and lasting than our cultural or political differences. We can coexist or we can seek to segregate ourselves. Segregation is a losing prospect and will only result in smaller and smaller populations as we segregate ourselves further and further until we are units of a single family. That's not a successful recipe - we have to cooperate, as we share this planet and what happens in one place inevitably affects other places.

Your patronizing attitude notwithstanding, you are dead wrong.

 

[LanceFreeman]

The United States is an Occupied Nation, folks; occupied by a foreign power, and it is time we all woke up to that. We have a legitimate right, as citizens, to fight this occupation, and to rid ourselves of the occupier. That is what I do every day. We are at the same place where we were in 1776, when our predecessors were trying to rid themselves of the British yoke.

Do not be taken by those who deflect from this subject, and try to paint the patriot as a 'hater' or 'conspiracy theorist'. Why else, for example, would the U.S. Congress accept a foreign set of laws (the Noahide Laws), prepared for us by the Judaic leadership in Israel, as legitimate laws which we must follow--if our Congress had not been ordered to do so by the occupier? Make sense?

 

[BobbyT]

The United States is an Occupied Nation, folks; occupied by a foreign power, and it is time we all woke up to that. We have a legitimate right, as citizens, to fight this occupation, and to rid ourselves of the occupier. That is what I do every day. We are at the same place where we were in 1776, when our predecessors were trying to rid themselves of the British yoke.

Do not be taken by those who deflect from this subject, and try to paint the patriot as a 'hater' or 'conspiracy theorist'. Why else, for example, would the U.S. Congress accept a foreign set of laws (the Noahide Laws), prepared for us by the Judaic leadership in Israel, as legitimate laws which we must follow--if our Congress had not been ordered to do so by the occupier? Make sense?

Which laws should we get rid of?

 

[LanceFreeman]

Nope, "race" is a social construct, not a scientific one. Sure there are different cultures, just as there are different languages. Always have been, and they are fluid, and that fluidity frequently comes with clashes. Mostly those clashes come from "you have something I want."

No one expects a utopia, such run contrary to how humans (and every other species on the planet) behave. That doesn't mean that fundamentally all humans don't want the same things because we all do, and cultures are just different expressions of those wants: to be safe, to raise our children to adulthood, to have at least a basic standard of living. Our similarities are far more important and lasting than our cultural or political differences. We can coexist or we can seek to segregate ourselves. Segregation is a losing prospect and will only result in smaller and smaller populations as we segregate ourselves further and further until we are units of a single family. That's not a successful recipe - we have to cooperate, as we share this planet and what happens in one place inevitably affects other places.

Your patronizing attitude notwithstanding, you are dead wrong.

Well, you have your vision and you are entitled to it. For my part, I think your stance is exceedingly naive, because it naively supports the New World Order program that evil men wish to impose on us, and which some of us reject. Yes, we do need to co-exist; and yes, segregation is a bad thing; and, yes, we all basically want the same thing, blah, blah. blah. And yes, you missed my whole bloody point. It's like talking to a brick wall. Good bye.

 

[BobbyT]

Well, you have your vision and you are entitled to it. For my part, I think your stance is exceedingly naive, because it naively supports the New World Order program that evil men wish to impose on us, and which some of us reject. Yes, we do need to co-exist; and yes, segregation is a bad thing; and, yes, we all basically want the same thing, blah, blah. blah. And yes, you missed my whole bloody point. It's like talking to a brick wall. Good bye.

Don't you hate it when brick walls talk back?

LOL

 

[LanceFreeman]

Don't you hate it when brick walls talk back?LOL

I generally ignore brick walls---

 

[BobbyT]

I generally ignore brick walls---

Yes I imagine you do. So much easier to convince the already converted.

 

[Drumcollie]

We were never homogeneous. I have no problem with "race mixing" and I find it bizarre that anyone does.

yet you joined the enslavers, the segregators and the people who let white people kill blacks without prosecution do still do to this say with abortion and I find it very bizarre that one who would claim they have no problem with race mixing would join the party against race mixing.

 

[Drumcollie]

Don't bother with these piece of shit bigots...Just be ready to confront them when the time comes

I bet your are ready...there you go...you hate him...dammit it's just a mirror. Way to go with the hate...you hate you. You have become everything you claim to despise.

 

[Drumcollie]

Since I know married couples in which one was Jewish and one not, and can give Ivanka Trump as an example, I know that "race mixing" is not something Jews actively prevent. Too, if a married mixed "race" couple does not share the same goals and values, they will solve that problem or not, as do couples who are not mixed "race" but do not share the same goals and values. Unlike you, I am not afraid of Talmudic laws nor of Sharia law. If they conflict with our laws, they will not stand, If they deal in the realm of the religious, in the same way as Catholic divorce and birth control doctrines, then what's the problem?

BTW, "race" is an artificial construct. There's only one "race" of humans: Cuomo sapiens sapiens. And all humans belong to it.

If so why did your party support segregation?