The mass migration into Europe is a godsend!!!

[resident_evil]

You ask why?

Because we as the advanced world can take refugees in like Christ would want us to. In that we would by example give people, Syrian people, an opportunity to accept Jesus Christ as their personal savior. :0)

But get this. We are taking in Syrian men and their families into a safe situation (by the hundreds of thousands if not millions). We can now train a true FREE SYRIAN ARMY to go back to Syria in 3 to 4 short years to capture or kill all of the Syrian regime AND IS with substantial US and EU military support.

We have our men for the job and their families are safe. When the job is done they can return home better educated, more appreciative of democracy, and hopefully more Christian. We will have a more stable and hopefully more democratic middle east. With the Saudis and Iranians and their lap dogs (IS and Assad) beaten and demoralized. With them knowing that they are next unless they change of their own free will. We have the formula now.


If the EU sponsored true FSA does not happen, then we know the truth of Syria and her men and the truth of Europe and her men.

 

[resident_evil]

The compact with these Syrians in the FSA would include their taking in a large number of Palestinians as Syrian citizens.

And we in the west could make certain demands in a new constitution for Syria.


WE do this and Iraq could be salvaged.

 

[resident_evil]

Really, an actually interesting idea and not one comment?

 

[as seen on tv]

European television showed at least one "refugee" smirking and making a beheading motion with his hand after he arrived in "asylum"

 

[resident_evil]

European television showed at least one "refugee" smirking and making a beheading motion with his hand after he arrived in "asylum"

There are more videos than that and even more disturbing.

Europe is literally screwed and they couldn't deserve it more. They were blessed with God's people who were doctors, lawyers, physicists and such and they butchered them and cooked them. No European nation was innocent in that. And now they receive God's curse via the Orient Express. Talk about karmic justice.

 

[resident_evil]

Bump: We're going to need some progressive liberal takers on this one.

 

[resident_evil]

 

[georgephillip]

The compact with these Syrians in the FSA would include their taking in a large number of Palestinians as Syrian citizens.

And we in the west could make certain demands in a new constitution for Syria.


WE do this and Iraq could be salvaged.

What's your definition of "salvaged?"

Iraq's fate was sealed in March of 2003.
Were you a supporter of Condi and O-I-L?
http://www.globalresearch.ca/plans-...e-east-the-project-for-a-new-middle-east/3882
"The term 'New Middle East' was introduced to the world in June 2006 in Tel Aviv by U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice (who was credited by the Western media for coining the term) in replacement of the older and more imposing term, the 'Greater Middle East.'

"This shift in foreign policy phraseology coincided with the inauguration of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) Oil Terminal in the Eastern Mediterranean.

"The term and conceptualization of the “New Middle East,” was subsequently heralded by the U.S. Secretary of State and the Israeli Prime Minister at the height of the Anglo-American sponsored Israeli siege of Lebanon. Prime Minister Olmert and Secretary Rice had informed the international media that a project for a 'New Middle East' was being launched from Lebanon."

The plan to redraw Muslim borders across the Middle East actually dates to an Israeli Jew writing in 1982. At that time, the existence of a rival superpower made the plan impractical.

Not so much in 2003.

 

[resident_evil]

What's your definition of "salvaged?"

Iraq's fate was sealed in March of 2003.
Were you a supporter of Condi and O-I-L?
http://www.globalresearch.ca/plans-...e-east-the-project-for-a-new-middle-east/3882
"The term 'New Middle East' was introduced to the world in June 2006 in Tel Aviv by U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice (who was credited by the Western media for coining the term) in replacement of the older and more imposing term, the 'Greater Middle East.'

"This shift in foreign policy phraseology coincided with the inauguration of the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) Oil Terminal in the Eastern Mediterranean.

"The term and conceptualization of the “New Middle East,” was subsequently heralded by the U.S. Secretary of State and the Israeli Prime Minister at the height of the Anglo-American sponsored Israeli siege of Lebanon. Prime Minister Olmert and Secretary Rice had informed the international media that a project for a 'New Middle East' was being launched from Lebanon."

The plan to redraw Muslim borders across the Middle East actually dates to an Israeli Jew writing in 1982. At that time, the existence of a rival superpower made the plan impractical.

Not so much in 2003.

The key here is to focus in on the idea of using Syrian refugees to train a true Free Syrian Army to return to Syria and get rid of the regime and IS while simultaneously mitigating the refugee outflow to Europe and being able to send refugees home in short order.

I don't give a flying banana's apple sauce about how the borders end up in the ME as long as they tend to demarcate democracies.

 

[georgephillip]

The key here is to focus in on the idea of using Syrian refugees to train a true Free Syrian Army to return to Syria and get rid of the regime and IS while simultaneously mitigating the refugee outflow to Europe and being able to send refugees home in short order.

I don't give a flying banana's apple sauce about how the borders end up in the ME as long as they tend to demarcate democracies.

So.... your solution to the mass killing, maiming, and displacement of millions of innocent Muslims is more killing? Maybe you've missed the "war is a racket" part. Since 1945 US militarists and war profiteers have used fear, enhanced by racism, to ruin the domestic economy by diverting resources to produce weapons and finance military expansion.

In simple terms: there will be no genuine economic or political reform until the US abolishes its permanent war machine.

 

[Queen Titania]

European television showed at least one "refugee" smirking and making a beheading motion with his hand after he arrived in "asylum"

Smirking at what and where was he from?

 

[resident_evil]

So.... your solution to the mass killing, maiming, and displacement of millions of innocent Muslims is more killing? Maybe you've missed the "war is a racket" part. Since 1945 US militarists and war profiteers have used fear, enhanced by racism, to ruin the domestic economy by diverting resources to produce weapons and finance military expansion.

In simple terms: there will be no genuine economic or political reform until the US abolishes its permanent war machine.

With people like you there never would have been a Revolutionary War nor a Bill of Rights and Hitler, Mao, and Stalin would be dancing a jig on the grave of democracies the world over.

 

[Fast Eddy]

The migration will hurt and change Europe. A sad day they allow them to push their way in. They will come to regret this.

 

[AIL]

You ask why?

Because we as the advanced world can take refugees in like Christ would want us to. In that we would by example give people, Syrian people, an opportunity to accept Jesus Christ as their personal savior. :0)

But get this. We are taking in Syrian men and their families into a safe situation (by the hundreds of thousands if not millions). We can now train a true FREE SYRIAN ARMY to go back to Syria in 3 to 4 short years to capture or kill all of the Syrian regime AND IS with substantial US and EU military support.

We have our men for the job and their families are safe. When the job is done they can return home better educated, more appreciative of democracy, and hopefully more Christian. We will have a more stable and hopefully more democratic middle east. With the Saudis and Iranians and their lap dogs (IS and Assad) beaten and demoralized. With them knowing that they are next unless they change of their own free will. We have the formula now.


If the EU sponsored true FSA does not happen, then we know the truth of Syria and her men and the truth of Europe and her men.

What a bunch of bullshit you swallow . American and western powers of Brittan France and sad to say our ass-hole prime minister harper created the mess in the first place by USA insisting on regime change in Somalia , Libya Syria Iran Afghanistan etcc Mind your own furken business and you would not have killed millions for nothing..
The amount of crap Yankees swallow is amazing its a never ending bullshit coming form your political leaders and worse by the simple fact that your useless media does not mention that your stupid polices of regime change have created a disaster ..


Here is a little history lesion even before the Iraq invasion the perdition was: It will be a failure just by referring to past regime changes all were disasters.

Yankee history proves the results were a Failure ..
Costing you billions and causing the death of millions . But you will never learn anything you are kept in the dark and fed bullshit.


Regime Change? We've Been Here Before (And It Wasn't Pretty)

Don't confuse it with preventing takeovers, restoring ousted leaders, removing ethnic-cleansing marauders or overthrowing governments that help terrorists attack us. We have done all of those things since World War II, but regime change consists exclusively of toppling an existing regime that displeases or worries the United States government.

Since World War II there have been at least four cases of classic regime change: the overthrow of Mohammad Mossadegh in Iran (1953), Jacobo Arbenz in Guatemala (1954), Ngo Dinh Diem in Vietnam (1963) and Salvador Allende in Chile (1973). An effort aimed at Fidel Castro in Cuba (1962) failed.

These earlier ousters of heads of state are not encouraging. Regime changes have a terrible way of backfiring. The Bush administration, pundits and Iraqi expatriates tell us constantly that Iraq is ripe for revolution. This notion, promoted largely by exiles, brings to mind our disastrous attempt to invade Cuba with an exile army forty years ago. Our leaders had convinced themselves that the moment the Cuban people spotted a liberating force they would rise up against Castro. Nothing of the sort happened. It proved a total misreading of Cuban sentiment.

The same thing could happen in Iraq, where the people may well prefer the devil they know to American, mostly Christian, invaders. Even worse, the potential invaders have allied themselves with Britain, the discredited colonial power that Iraqis assumed had gone forever. Surely some will respond, but we cannot assume they will be numerous enough to help an invasion and occupation.

One thing will be different. In Iraq, the administration plans to use enormous force from the start. The Cuban expedition was far too small, under-equipped and under-supported. In fact, the hallmark of all the classic American regime changes has been the tiny amount of effort and resources provided by the United States. In Guatemala, Washington relied upon armed exiles; in Iran, Vietnam and Chile, upon covert U.S. government support for opponents of the local regime.

Read and learn don't stay ignorant all or life.

http://historynewsnetwork.org/article/1052

 

[AIL]

The migration will hurt and change Europe. A sad day they allow them to push their way in. They will come to regret this.

That was the same mistake north amerac Indians made when they let you in. Go back to where your ancestors came from is that what you are saying.

So when are you going back? Plase leave ASAP.

 

[resident_evil]

What a bunch of bullshit you swallow . American and western powers of Brittan France and sad to say our ass-hole prime minister harper created the mess in the first place by USA insisting on regime change in Somalia , Libya Syria Iran Afghanistan etcc Mind your own furken business and you would not have killed millions for nothing..
The amount of crap Yankees swallow is amazing its a never ending bullshit coming form your political leaders and worse by the simple fact that your useless media does not mention that your stupid polices of regime change have created a disaster ..


Here is a little history lesion even before the Iraq invasion the perdition was: It will be a failure just by referring to past regime changes all were disasters.

Yankee history proves the results were a Failure ..
Costing you billions and causing the death of millions . But you will never learn anything you are kept in the dark and fed bullshit.


Regime Change? We've Been Here Before (And It Wasn't Pretty)

Don't confuse it with preventing takeovers, restoring ousted leaders, removing ethnic-cleansing marauders or overthrowing governments that help terrorists attack us. We have done all of those things since World War II, but regime change consists exclusively of toppling an existing regime that displeases or worries the United States government.

Since World War II there have been at least four cases of classic regime change: the overthrow of Mohammad Mossadegh in Iran (1953), Jacobo Arbenz in Guatemala (1954), Ngo Dinh Diem in Vietnam (1963) and Salvador Allende in Chile (1973). An effort aimed at Fidel Castro in Cuba (1962) failed.

These earlier ousters of heads of state are not encouraging. Regime changes have a terrible way of backfiring. The Bush administration, pundits and Iraqi expatriates tell us constantly that Iraq is ripe for revolution. This notion, promoted largely by exiles, brings to mind our disastrous attempt to invade Cuba with an exile army forty years ago. Our leaders had convinced themselves that the moment the Cuban people spotted a liberating force they would rise up against Castro. Nothing of the sort happened. It proved a total misreading of Cuban sentiment.

The same thing could happen in Iraq, where the people may well prefer the devil they know to American, mostly Christian, invaders. Even worse, the potential invaders have allied themselves with Britain, the discredited colonial power that Iraqis assumed had gone forever. Surely some will respond, but we cannot assume they will be numerous enough to help an invasion and occupation.

One thing will be different. In Iraq, the administration plans to use enormous force from the start. The Cuban expedition was far too small, under-equipped and under-supported. In fact, the hallmark of all the classic American regime changes has been the tiny amount of effort and resources provided by the United States. In Guatemala, Washington relied upon armed exiles; in Iran, Vietnam and Chile, upon covert U.S. government support for opponents of the local regime.

Read and learn don't stay ignorant all or life.

http://historynewsnetwork.org/article/1052

You do know the topic at hand is Syrian refugees streaming into Europe and how to help them return whence they came?

 

[resident_evil]

That was the same mistake north amerac Indians made when they let you in. Go back to where your ancestors came from is that what you are saying.

So when are you going back? Plase leave ASAP.

So you're a First Nations Canadian?

 

[AIL]

So you're a First Nations Canadian?

No I am not but fast eddy stated that taking in the refuges is a big mistake. So taking him in was a mistake for the native American.. LOGIC 101

 

[Queen Titania]

The migration will hurt and change Europe. A sad day they allow them to push their way in. They will come to regret this.

It already has --- but War refugees are different and need only a safe haven until they can go home, which by all accounts Syrians will want to do.

There is more going on here than meets the eye, I think.

 

[georgephillip]

With people like you there never would have been a Revolutionary War nor a Bill of Rights and Hitler, Mao, and Stalin would be dancing a jig on the grave of democracies the world over.

People like you are the reason 14 years of war, interventions, assassinations, torture, terror, and black sites have accomplished everything bin-Laden hoped for, including the spread of Islamic extremism across much of the Middle East and Africa.

Al Qaeda goaded the US into doing what it had neither the resources nor ability to do, and people like you made it happen.