New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

TheHill.com posts shockingly bad poll numbers

Dino

Russian Asset
More educated Washington followers are hard to come by, and this group is represented as "likely voters" to boot...

The Hill Poll: Voter gloom over Obama’s jobs, gas, debt policies
By Elise Viebeck - 03/19/12 05:00 AM ET

Half of likely voters expect the Supreme Court to strike down President Obama’s signature healthcare law, and strong majorities see other major policies coming from the White House making life more difficult for themselves and the country, according to this week’s The Hill Poll.

The poll indicated that 49 percent of likely voters said they expect a court ruling that is unfavorable to the Affordable Care Act, while just 29 percent think it will be upheld and 22 percent aren’t sure.


On economic issues, 62 percent of voters say Obama’s policies will increase the debt, while 25 percent think they will cut it, and by a 48-percent-to-38-percent margin, voters believe those policies will increase joblessness rather than put people back to work.

On energy, 58 percent say Obama’s policies will result in gasoline prices increasing, while just 20 percent expect them to cut prices — and by a 46-percent-to-36-percent margin, voters believe they will cause the United States to become even more dependent on foreign oil.

Voters’ wide-ranging pessimism comes as gasoline prices have risen sharply, which often dampens attitudes among U.S. voters toward those in power, and as opinions remain sharply divided on the president’s healthcare law.

http://thehill.com/polls/216591-the-hill-poll-voter-gloom-on-obamas-jobs-gas-debt-policies
 
"Half of likely voters expect the Supreme Court to strike down President Obama’s signature healthcare law"

Hahahahahaha! Wonder which half that would be.

"On economic issues, 62 percent of voters say Obama’s policies will increase the debt"

Stop! Yer killin' me! Why isn't it 100%? Did they let mental patients participate?

"On energy, 58 percent say Obama’s policies will result in gasoline prices increasing"

The other 42% of respondents finished high school.

Here's the one that means something:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/president_obama_vs_republican_candidates.html
 
Well....since the lefties are so 'fond' of Roe vs. Wade....they'll have to make a choice. They can't have Roe vs. Wade AND ObamaCare both.

One has to go. Guess which one it will be.
 
So which poll do you like? The one where he's up 4, even, or down 2?

If you don't think the unconstitutionality of his massive health care package (now almost double what he told us it would cost) or energy and gas prices "mean something" you might just have to be included in those (obviously Dem) "mental patients" you referred to.
 
So what's the tally on challenges to the HCB so far?

Want to see links to every Republican and every FOX Noose blowhard explaining why the President has nothing to do with gas prices? Or do you prefer the way they all say he does now that he's a Democrat?

Do you really want a plastic President elected by dittoheads based on pure bullsh_t? (Rhetorical.)

Sorry. Ain't gonna happen. We already have the best guy available and we're keeping him. The "say no to everything", three year election strategy failed. Failed everybody. All of us know it. (Look at congressional approval ratings.) Half of us admit it. The honest half.
 
You're not upset with the Senate that refuses to vote on House bills that are already passed and waiting? How telling. How honest.

At this point, I've seen enough of Obama to know he doesn't know what he's doing, and I trust Gingrich, Santorum, or Romney to do a better job. And the numbers on my side are clearly growing.
 
More educated Washington followers are hard to come by, and this group is represented as "likely voters" to boot...

The Hill Poll: Voter gloom over Obama’s jobs, gas, debt policies
By Elise Viebeck - 03/19/12 05:00 AM ET


Half of likely voters expect the Supreme Court to strike down President Obama’s signature healthcare law, and strong majorities see other major policies coming from the White House making life more difficult for themselves and the country, according to this week’s The Hill Poll.

The poll indicated that 49 percent of likely voters said they expect a court ruling that is unfavorable to the Affordable Care Act, while just 29 percent think it will be upheld and 22 percent aren’t sure.


On economic issues, 62 percent of voters say Obama’s policies will increase the debt, while 25 percent think they will cut it, and by a 48-percent-to-38-percent margin, voters believe those policies will increase joblessness rather than put people back to work.

On energy, 58 percent say Obama’s policies will result in gasoline prices increasing, while just 20 percent expect them to cut prices — and by a 46-percent-to-36-percent margin, voters believe they will cause the United States to become even more dependent on foreign oil.

Voters’ wide-ranging pessimism comes as gasoline prices have risen sharply, which often dampens attitudes among U.S. voters toward those in power, and as opinions remain sharply divided on the president’s healthcare law.

http://thehill.com/polls/216591-the-hill-poll-voter-gloom-on-obamas-jobs-gas-debt-policies

For whom are these "shockingly bad poll numbers"? Let's take the first question as a for instance. The poll suggests that "Half of likely voters expect the Supreme Court to strike down President Obama's signature healthcare law". Yet as a quite simple matter of fact, Obama's "signature healthcare law" isn't even BEFORE the Supreme Court. The Court couldn't strike it down if it wanted to. So...I imagine it IS "shockingly bad" that half those polled think they will!

But...let's pretend that these polled know that the only question in front of The Court is the "mandate" and that they feel that it will be struck down. So what? What do their feelings have to do with the eventual outcome? Do we seriously believe that the feelings of we non-legal rabble, are the least bit relevant as to the outcome? And just for fun, it would be interesting to get a breakdown of this particular feelings-set. I'll betcha we find it divided into two distinct parts. One part feels that The Court will rule against (whatever!) because The Court is "good" and The Court is on "their side". And..the other part feels that The Court will rule against, because The Court is BAD and is on the others' side!
 
Polls sometimes reveal the power of GOP lies and brainwashing.

For example, cons claim in the health care suit that there is a constitutional right to continue leeching health care. But there isn't.

Cons also spew lies daily to the effect that Obama's policies have made the economy worse. All economic metrics show steady improvement for some 24 months in a row.

The constant barrage of lies and gloom from the RNC and GOP hacks have an effect on perceptions. That's why they lie.
 
I'm always leery right off the bat, when I'm presented with polling that goes to what people "think will happen", as opposed to polling that specifically asks what they'll do or what they want to happen.

For instance, if we were to ask people if they intend to vote for Mitt in the fall AND if they think Mitt will win in the fall, we would probably come up with two very different numbers. To the lay observer who didn't know how to apply the latter number, it wouldn't be especially useful. Therefore - way more often that not - when we see the media publishing polling as to "what people" think", it's only in an effort to delude we rabble into seeing something that isn't there.
 
You're not upset with the Senate that refuses to vote on House bills that are already passed and waiting? How telling. How honest.

At this point, I've seen enough of Obama to know he doesn't know what he's doing, and I trust Gingrich, Santorum, or Romney to do a better job. And the numbers on my side are clearly growing.

Rational people see no point wasting time taking votes on bills that everybody knows would never pass.

Not that the Republicans in the Senate allow votes on many things in any event.
 
What Bugsy said. What you knew before he said it.

"I trust Gingrich, Santorum, or Romney to do a better job."

Based on nothing. I wouldn't trust any of them to feed my dog while I was out of town. I base that on their resumes, recent statements and bios. Among the three, Santorum seems most genuine and grounded. Does that tell you anything? That the crazy guy is the only one you can trust to be real?

Vote for who will be best for the country. If you vote your hatred, Bush will look like a benevolent genius in comparison to what you get this time. These guys are so phony and self immersed, they make me want to puke. Wake up, Dino.
 
I'm quite awake. Only a sleepyhead like you would claim that Obama came in the presidency with anything of a resume better than Gingrich, Santorum, OR Romney.

You are such a deluded Kool-Aid drinker you probably don't even realize how out of touch you sound making any such claim.
 
Four (4) Republican Justices will rule on Obamacare.............

good luck with your liberal dreams...........soon to be nightmares.........HOPEFULLY
 
I'm quite awake. Only a sleepyhead like you would claim that Obama came in the presidency with anything of a resume better than Gingrich, Santorum, OR Romney.

You are such a deluded Kool-Aid drinker you probably don't even realize how out of touch you sound making any such claim.

It's not that they have no resumes. It's that they want to take this nation backwards and do everything they can to further drive wealth and income upward when that's the last thing the nation needs. On top of that, now they also call for further policing of women's vaginas, when I thought that was resolved decades ago. You have horrible candidates with horrible ideas.
 
Four (4) Republican Justices will rule on Obamacare.............

good luck with your liberal dreams...........soon to be nightmares.........HOPEFULLY

Thye 4 GOP hacks on the SCOTUS will do the GOP's political bidding and agree that there is some constitutional right to leech health care. No doubt.
 
How is anyone trying to "police vaginas"? I think your wild imagination is confusing everyone else's reality.
 
Back
Top