- driving is a specific, licensed activity. It is not a fundamental right. And the intrusion on liberty of requiring a license is demostrably based in life safety. No evidence has been presented that photo id addresses misrepresentative voting fraud in ways that other less restrictive methods do not
- boarding an airplane does not actually legally require photo id. Rather that is the result of contract between you and the carrier
- doctor's visit requires zero id. That's what emtala is all about
- applying for a job has no legal id requirement. My current job i have not presented id.
- pharmacy - does not require id. Commerce in certain narcotics does. But rememer the constitution explicitly permits commerce regulation. Voting is a fundamental constitutional right
- bank transactions do not legally require id. I do a lot of my bank transactions without one. The only id legally required is your ss# in opening an account
- school applications do not legally require photo id
- store credit applications do not legally require any id much less photo id. The contractor may ask for it but there is no legal requirement
- estabilishing a utilities accout does not legally require any id much less photo id
- purchasing a car does not legally require any id... I just sold a car. I know.
- car registration does not legally require any id much less photo id.
- outpatient testing does not require any id see emtala
- medicare/medicaid does not legally require any id, much less photo id. Contractually a provider may ask for id but it is not required
- opening an ira only requires social security card and no photo id
- voting in a union has no legal requirment to have any id much less photoid. The union may contractually ask for one but that is different
- blood donation does not legally require id
- buying a firearm does not legally require id, much less photo id. That's what was at the heart of fast and furious - private gun sales have no restrictions
- social security services require a social security card but no photo id
- pawn shops do not legally require any id
- writing a check does notlegally require any sort of id. The person recieving the check may ask for it as a condition of accepting the check but that is not a legal requirement
- using a credit card does not legally rquire any sort of id see writing a check
- buying car insurance does not legally require any sort of id.
- buying train tickets does not legally require any id
- buying an amusement park ticket does not legally require any id. Some parks may contractually ask for one, but thats contracting not legal requirement
- there is no legal requirement for id of any sort to volunterr at "non prophet" [sic!!!] orgs
- there is no legal requirement for id to check out a library book, and any id that may be contractually required is not photo id
- some professional licensing has an id requirement. But licensing is not a fundamental exercise of rights voting is
- buying a house does not legally require any sort of id.
- renting an apartment does not legally require any sort of id. Contractually the lessor may ask for one but that's not a legal requirement
- buying cigarettes of liquor does not legally require any sort of id. The vendor may contractually seek a way to verify your age, but that is a contractual issue
are you really so ignorant as to not understand the difference between contractual request and a
legal requirement?
are you really so ignorant of your rights and basic civics that you do not understand the difference between contracting and
exercising a fundamental right?
What mkes the photo id requirement racist is that it is intentionally intended to reduce the voting proportion of minorities. That is indisputable.
And there is no voter fraud that it actually addresses better than just requiring a signature.