"This is Not a Political Season to Take Casually"

[georgephillip]

What has choosing the "lesser evil" given us?
It would appear the answers lies between a pair of corporate brands one of which is under criminal investigation by the FBI and the other should be"

"The Washington Post is reporting this morning that the FBI is conducting a criminal investigation of Hillary Clinton’s handling of emails during her tenure as Secretary of State..."

"These are the same concerns that have dogged Hillary and Bill Clinton throughout their government careers: that there is one set of rules for the little people and effectively no rules for the Clintons.

"From the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act to deregulating derivatives to destabilizing Libya, they break a lot of stuff then walk away, leaving the U.S. taxpayer to clean up the mess..."

"And in the process, they become worth over $100 million – a significant part of which comes from speaking fees from the very Wall Street firms that benefited from Bill Clinton’s mass financial deregulation..."

"This is what years of tolerating voting for the lesser evil has delivered voters in the United States.

http://wallstreetonparade.com/2016/...ow-we-previously-handled-classified-material/

"The leader in the Democratic primary for U.S. President is under a criminal investigation while the Republican leader is being called a fraud and a con man by his own party.

"The New York Times editorial board on Tuesday called Trump 'a shady, bombastic liar' while the Los Angeles Times editorial board wrote yesterday that Trump is 'not fit' to be President, calling him 'a racist and a bully, a demagogue...'"

"But no one should view Hillary Clinton as the lesser evil. At this point we don’t know the full range of the FBI’s criminal investigation. Should Hillary become the nominee at the Democratic National Convention in July and then be charged by the FBI before the November election, potentially throwing the election to Trump, that could well render her the greater evil.

"This is not a political season to take casually."

 

[Jen]

To me what it boils down to is either choosing a corrupt family dynasty or choosing someone outside the system. With the former......we know what we're getting: lies and corruption. With the latter, we don't know what we are getting at all.

But if we look at the history of our nation's economy and foreign policy for the last 16 years, almost all of us will agree that we need a change. Voting for the corrupt dynasty............is not change. Voting for something new, a businessman at the helm - will be change.

I will opt for change.
I didn't want the Bush dynasty to continue and I do not want the Clinton dynasty to continue.

 

[georgephillip]

To me what it boils down to is either choosing a corrupt family dynasty or choosing someone outside the system. With the former......we know what we're getting: lies and corruption. With the latter, we don't know what we are getting at all.

But if we look at the history of our nation's economy and foreign policy for the last 16 years, almost all of us will agree that we need a change. Voting for the corrupt dynasty............is not change. Voting for something new, a businessman at the helm - will be change.

I will opt for change.
I didn't want the Bush dynasty to continue and I do not want the Clinton dynasty to continue.

http://wallstreetonparade.com/2016/...ow-we-previously-handled-classified-material/

"The idea that a Yale Law School graduate and two-term Senator like Hillary Clinton would not understand the gross negligence involved in transmitting tens of thousands of, at the very least, highly sensitive government communications from a household server raises a host of concerns about what was really going on.

"These are the same concerns that have dogged Hillary and Bill Clinton throughout their government careers: that there is one set of rules for the little people and effectively no rules for the Clintons."
If my only choice was Clinton or Trump, I would choose Trump.

 

[justoffal]

http://wallstreetonparade.com/2016/...ow-we-previously-handled-classified-material/

"The idea that a Yale Law School graduate and two-term Senator like Hillary Clinton would not understand the gross negligence involved in transmitting tens of thousands of, at the very least, highly sensitive government communications from a household server raises a host of concerns about what was really going on.

"These are the same concerns that have dogged Hillary and Bill Clinton throughout their government careers: that there is one set of rules for the little people and effectively no rules for the Clintons."
If my only choice was Clinton or Trump, I would choose Trump.

Hillary is not stupid by any means she is however arrogant to the extreme and it cost her the last election a mistake I don't think she want's to make again.

I'm not sure what will happen in the nationals she should be the odds on favorite by a long shot but it really depends on the political awareness of the voting electorate and in the past they have not been particularly aware.

 

[georgephillip]

Hillary is not stupid by any means she is however arrogant to the extreme and it cost her the last election a mistake I don't think she want's to make again.

I'm not sure what will happen in the nationals she should be the odds on favorite by a long shot but it really depends on the political awareness of the voting electorate and in the past they have not been particularly aware.

She personifies arrogance, not unlike Bill does, yet Hillary has none of his campaigning skills or "warmth."

Maybe a grand jury will trump her hopes for the White House this time?

"The Washington Post reports that Bryan Pagliano, the former State Department staffer who may have set up and maintained Hillary Clinton’s 'homebrew' server, has been 'granted immunity' by the Justice Department.

"The Post describes its source as a single, senior law-enforcement official — though I assume the paper corroborated its source before running with the story (which Politico elaborates on).

Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/432301/hillary-clinton-grand-jury