This is not good for Sessions.

[Raoul_Luke]

If he had nothing to cover up, why the lie?

Exactly - it wasn't a lie.

 

[Raoul_Luke]

If your argument is that Sessions was answering the question "in the context it was asked"--and not the specific question he was in fact asked - - and that his answer was too imprecise to make that clear, he is simply too incompetent as a lawyer to be fit for the office of attorney general.

Well that is an entirely different matter. Of course, we'd need to hold Holder and Lynch to that same standard, right?