This is why gopers are whining about fact checking

[Spamature]

Because bit by bit it exposes the treasonous truth they don't want face.


"On Oct. 7, the Access Hollywood tape comes out. One hour later, WikiLeaks starts dropping my emails."

— John Podesta on Sunday, December 18th, 2016 in an interview on "Meet the Press"






http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...ue-wikileaks-dumped-podesta-emails-hour-afte/

 

[NinaS]

Because bit by bit it exposes the treasonous truth they don't want face.


"On Oct. 7, the Access Hollywood tape comes out. One hour later, WikiLeaks starts dropping my emails."

— John Podesta on Sunday, December 18th, 2016 in an interview on "Meet the Press"






http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...ue-wikileaks-dumped-podesta-emails-hour-afte/

How True.
BUMP!

 

[Deleted member 21794]

And...

 

[Dino]

And...

And... Boy did those released emails make Podesta out to be an anti-Semite and Hillary Clinton seem wholly unelectable.

Damn!! The truth got out!

And now we get a liberal hissy fit over it... but for how long?

 

[Drumcollie]

Because bit by bit it exposes the treasonous truth they don't want face.


"On Oct. 7, the Access Hollywood tape comes out. One hour later, WikiLeaks starts dropping my emails."

— John Podesta on Sunday, December 18th, 2016 in an interview on "Meet the Press"






http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...ue-wikileaks-dumped-podesta-emails-hour-afte/

So effen what...you lost!

 

[Drumcollie]

And... Boy did those released emails make Podesta out to be an anti-Semite and Hillary Clinton seem wholly unelectable.

Damn!! The truth got out!

And now we get a liberal hissy fit over it... but for how long?

Till the diaper gets changed.

 

[Drumcollie]

How True.
BUMP!

They can call it whatever they want. Hillary didn't win did she?"

It's a paraphrased Harry Reid quote...what goes around comes around...sucks to be you.

 

[Dino]

And... Boy did those released emails make Podesta out to be an anti-Semite and Hillary Clinton seem wholly unelectable.

Damn!! The truth got out!

And now we get a liberal hissy fit over it... but for how long?

Wow, someone "disagrees" with the truth... but has no comment on it?

I guess some admit to being delusional.

 

[Deleted member 21794]

And... Boy did those released emails make Podesta out to be an anti-Semite and Hillary Clinton seem wholly unelectable.

Damn!! The truth got out!

And now we get a liberal hissy fit over it... but for how long?

I didn't realize the electoral vote today isn't released until January. So while the vote is done and over with today, I suspect we'll hear more whining about Russians, Huma Abedin, Wikileaks, white supremacists and anything and everything else to prevent looking at their problem this election cycle: HILLARY CLINTON.

 

[Spamature]

How True.
BUMP!

I know. The big picture get clearer everyday.

 

[Spamature]

So effen what...you lost!

You tea party messiah sure got himself quick service from Putin when trouble hit. I wonder what such action cost him ? And by him I mean America.

 

[JuliefromOhio]

there's still the chance that Trump will "resign" before inauguration day or mentally implode.

 

[UPNYA2]

Because bit by bit it exposes the treasonous truth they don't want face.


"On Oct. 7, the Access Hollywood tape comes out. One hour later, WikiLeaks starts dropping my emails."

— John Podesta on Sunday, December 18th, 2016 in an interview on "Meet the Press"






http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2016/dec/18/john-podesta/its-true-wikileaks-dumped-podesta-emails-hour-afte/

If in fact anyone within the GOP is actually, "whining about fact checking", as you claim, why in the livin' HELL would they whine about THIS fact being true?

"On Oct. 7, the Access Hollywood tape comes out. One hour later, WikiLeaks starts dropping my emails," Podesta told Chuck Todd on Dec. 18, 2016. "One could say that those things might not have been a coincidence."

So?

Someone exposed documentation of Trump acting sexist in an attempt to hurt his chances at being President and soon after someone presented documentation of a Clinton clown acting like an ass....... Who thinks that is wrong and who would argue that one party did something in retaliation to something the other party did anyway?

Grow up.

Besides, did you actually READ what poor little Podesta said here?

"On Oct. 7, the Access Hollywood tape comes out. One hour later, WikiLeaks starts dropping my emails,"

As I stated, that fact shows how the backers of one political candidate
lashed out at the second political candidate AFTER some backers of the second candidate lashed out at the first. Tit for tat in politics, nothing unusual, nothing to argue.

"Podesta told Chuck Todd on Dec. 18, 2016. "One could say that those things might not have been a coincidence."

Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh................OK?

One "could say" damned near ANYTHING I reckon. Hard to argue that "fact".

'Those things might not have been a coincidence." Another "fact" for sure.

He actually STATED, "One could say that those things might not have been a coincidence.", a FACT that you seem impressed was "verified", but.............BUT.......... that ALSO means that one could say that those things might HAVE been a coincidence, and that would be equally as verifiable a "fact" as the other.

That is the problem with dealing with "facts" based upon what one "could say" and what "might" or "might not" have been, know what I mean hossfly?

 

[Dino]

If in fact anyone within the GOP is actually, "whining about fact checking", as you claim, why in the livin' HELL would they whine about THIS fact being true?

"On Oct. 7, the Access Hollywood tape comes out. One hour later, WikiLeaks starts dropping my emails," Podesta told Chuck Todd on Dec. 18, 2016. "One could say that those things might not have been a coincidence."

So?

Someone exposed documentation of Trump acting sexist in an attempt to hurt his chances at being President and soon after someone presented documentation of a Clinton clown acting like an ass....... Who thinks that is wrong and who would argue that one party did something in retaliation to something the other party did anyway?

Grow up.

Besides, did you actually READ what poor little Podesta said here?

"On Oct. 7, the Access Hollywood tape comes out. One hour later, WikiLeaks starts dropping my emails,"

As I stated, that fact shows how the backers of one political candidate
lashed out at the second political candidate AFTER some backers of the second candidate lashed out at the first. Tit for tat in politics, nothing unusual, nothing to argue.

"Podesta told Chuck Todd on Dec. 18, 2016. "One could say that those things might not have been a coincidence."

Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh................OK?

One "could say" damned near ANYTHING I reckon. Hard to argue that "fact".

'Those things might not have been a coincidence." Another "fact" for sure.

He actually STATED, "One could say that those things might not have been a coincidence.", a FACT that you seem impressed was "verified", but.............BUT.......... that ALSO means that one could say that those things might HAVE been a coincidence, and that would be equally as verifiable a "fact" as the other.

That is the problem with dealing with "facts" based upon what one "could say" and what "might" or "might not" have been, know what I mean hossfly?

Like I've said about that from day one- the Democrats got pissed off that someone was actually fighting back against their dirty tricks..finally.

Too damned bad.

 

[UPNYA2]

there's still the chance that Trump will "resign" before inauguration day or mentally implode.

Oh there will no doubt be a heapin' pile of mental implosions, sweetie, but I'll bet you 5 dollars to a doughnut it will be you frail little Trump-o-phobes doing the melting, not Trump.

Take care that they pad your WHOLE room, any spot they might miss you could find and use to harm yourself and no one wants that.......... Good luck.

 

[Spamature]

If in fact anyone within the GOP is actually, "whining about fact checking", as you claim, why in the livin' HELL would they whine about THIS fact being true?

"On Oct. 7, the Access Hollywood tape comes out. One hour later, WikiLeaks starts dropping my emails," Podesta told Chuck Todd on Dec. 18, 2016. "One could say that those things might not have been a coincidence."

So?

Someone exposed documentation of Trump acting sexist in an attempt to hurt his chances at being President and soon after someone presented documentation of a Clinton clown acting like an ass....... Who thinks that is wrong and who would argue that one party did something in retaliation to something the other party did anyway?

Grow up.

Besides, did you actually READ what poor little Podesta said here?

"On Oct. 7, the Access Hollywood tape comes out. One hour later, WikiLeaks starts dropping my emails,"

As I stated, that fact shows how the backers of one political candidate
lashed out at the second political candidate AFTER some backers of the second candidate lashed out at the first. Tit for tat in politics, nothing unusual, nothing to argue.

"Podesta told Chuck Todd on Dec. 18, 2016. "One could say that those things might not have been a coincidence."

Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh................OK?

One "could say" damned near ANYTHING I reckon. Hard to argue that "fact".

'Those things might not have been a coincidence." Another "fact" for sure.

He actually STATED, "One could say that those things might not have been a coincidence.", a FACT that you seem impressed was "verified", but.............BUT.......... that ALSO means that one could say that those things might HAVE been a coincidence, and that would be equally as verifiable a "fact" as the other.

That is the problem with dealing with "facts" based upon what one "could say" and what "might" or "might not" have been, know what I mean hossfly?

Quit saying backers and just say Putin.

As I stated, that fact shows how the backers of one political candidate PUTIN
lashed out at the second political candidate AFTER some backers of the second candidate lashed out at the first. Tit for tat in politics, nothing unusual, nothing to argue.

It was not a coincidence. It was a retaliation strike by Putin who was personally involved in disseminating the information according to our intelligence agencies.

 

[Spamature]

Like I've said about that from day one- the Democrats got pissed off that someone was actually fighting back against their dirty tricks..finally.

Too damned bad.

Don't say "someone". Man up and say Putin. This was an attack on us not "fighting back". If so just say that ISIS is "fighting back" when they go into another country and steal a truck to run people over rather than stealing information and using it.

 

[Dino]

Don't say "someone". Man up and say Putin. This was an attack on us not "fighting back". If so just say that ISIS is "fighting back" when they go into another country and steal a truck to run people over rather than stealing information and using it.

If foreign nations are allowed to hack us without penalty or fear whose fault is that?
Trump's?
Putin's?
Or 0bama's?

 

[Spamature]

If foreign nations are allowed to hack us without penalty or fear whose fault is that?
Trump's?
Putin's?
Or 0bama's?

Who says there is not penalty ? Not Obama. Trump maybe. In fact he rewards it.

 

[marvin martian]

Who says there is not penalty ? Not Obama. Trump maybe. In fact he rewards it.

You're on a tear today, Little War Hawk.