New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Tomahawks to Ukraine, wait, what?

Raoul_Luke

"Wait, it's all Marxism?" "Always has been."
I have been repeatedly assured by the lefty neocons pimping NATO aggression that there is no way to deploy a missile such as the Tomahawk from a land based launcher, so there is nothing for Russia to fear from having NATO bases ringing its borders. Well, that particular gaslight is now officially burned out. The only way Tomahawks to Ukraine makes sense is if they have a way to launch them from Ukraine (Ukraine does not possess a navy). So what's up?

Of course, as I pointed out when I was being gaslit on this matter, there most certainly is a way to launch tomahawks from land based missile launchers - enter the Typhon:

The Mid-Range Capability (MRC) Typhon is a mobile, ground-launched missile system developed to provide the U.S. Army with enhanced long-range strike capabilities. The system is designed to bridge the gap between shorter-range missile systems and long-range strike assets, allowing for precision targeting in heavily defended, contested environments. Manufactured by Lockheed Martin, the Typhon Weapon System leverages a modular design that allows it to fire various missile types, including SM-6 and Tomahawk missiles.


So why is this a big deal? Simple: because the payload capacity of the tomahawk makes it capable of carrying nuclear warheads. And once launched into Russian air space, Russia has no way of knowing they aren't under nuclear attack. They will have no choice but to respond as if they are.

This is the reason for the Ukraine war - to keep these missiles off the Russian border. If Trump allows them to be sent to Ukraine, I would expect Putin (or Medvedev more likely) to announce that as soon as one is launched from Ukrainian soil, Russia will immediately retaliate by sending a barrage of nuclear tipped missiles into Ukraine.

The next move will be yours, NATO warmogers...
​
 
I have been repeatedly assured by the lefty neocons pimping NATO aggression that there is no way to deploy a missile such as the Tomahawk from a land based launcher, so there is nothing for Russia to fear from having NATO bases ringing its borders. Well, that particular gaslight is now officially burned out. The only way Tomahawks to Ukraine makes sense is if they have a way to launch them from Ukraine (Ukraine does not possess a navy). So what's up?

Of course, as I pointed out when I was being gaslit on this matter, there most certainly is a way to launch tomahawks from land based missile launchers - enter the Typhon:

The Mid-Range Capability (MRC) Typhon is a mobile, ground-launched missile system developed to provide the U.S. Army with enhanced long-range strike capabilities. The system is designed to bridge the gap between shorter-range missile systems and long-range strike assets, allowing for precision targeting in heavily defended, contested environments. Manufactured by Lockheed Martin, the Typhon Weapon System leverages a modular design that allows it to fire various missile types, including SM-6 and Tomahawk missiles.


So why is this a big deal? Simple: because the payload capacity of the tomahawk makes it capable of carrying nuclear warheads. And once launched into Russian air space, Russia has no way of knowing they aren't under nuclear attack. They will have no choice but to respond as if they are.

This is the reason for the Ukraine war - to keep these missiles off the Russian border. If Trump allows them to be sent to Ukraine, I would expect Putin (or Medvedev more likely) to announce that as soon as one is launched from Ukrainian soil, Russia will immediately retaliate by sending a barrage of nuclear tipped missiles into Ukraine.

The next move will be yours, NATO warmogers...

​
​
Paranoid babble...
 
I have been repeatedly assured by the lefty neocons pimping NATO aggression that there is no way to deploy a missile such as the Tomahawk from a land based launcher, so there is nothing for Russia to fear from having NATO bases ringing its borders. Well, that particular gaslight is now officially burned out. The only way Tomahawks to Ukraine makes sense is if they have a way to launch them from Ukraine (Ukraine does not possess a navy). So what's up?

Of course, as I pointed out when I was being gaslit on this matter, there most certainly is a way to launch tomahawks from land based missile launchers - enter the Typhon:

The Mid-Range Capability (MRC) Typhon is a mobile, ground-launched missile system developed to provide the U.S. Army with enhanced long-range strike capabilities. The system is designed to bridge the gap between shorter-range missile systems and long-range strike assets, allowing for precision targeting in heavily defended, contested environments. Manufactured by Lockheed Martin, the Typhon Weapon System leverages a modular design that allows it to fire various missile types, including SM-6 and Tomahawk missiles.


So why is this a big deal? Simple: because the payload capacity of the tomahawk makes it capable of carrying nuclear warheads. And once launched into Russian air space, Russia has no way of knowing they aren't under nuclear attack. They will have no choice but to respond as if they are.

This is the reason for the Ukraine war - to keep these missiles off the Russian border. If Trump allows them to be sent to Ukraine, I would expect Putin (or Medvedev more likely) to announce that as soon as one is launched from Ukrainian soil, Russia will immediately retaliate by sending a barrage of nuclear tipped missiles into Ukraine.

The next move will be yours, NATO warmogers...

​
​

Reminder - it was your cult leader who was yapping about sending Tomahawks to Ukraine.
 
I have been repeatedly assured by the lefty neocons pimping NATO aggression that there is no way to deploy a missile such as the Tomahawk from a land based launcher, so there is nothing for Russia to fear from having NATO bases ringing its borders. Well, that particular gaslight is now officially burned out. The only way Tomahawks to Ukraine makes sense is if they have a way to launch them from Ukraine (Ukraine does not possess a navy). So what's up?

Of course, as I pointed out when I was being gaslit on this matter, there most certainly is a way to launch tomahawks from land based missile launchers - enter the Typhon:

The Mid-Range Capability (MRC) Typhon is a mobile, ground-launched missile system developed to provide the U.S. Army with enhanced long-range strike capabilities. The system is designed to bridge the gap between shorter-range missile systems and long-range strike assets, allowing for precision targeting in heavily defended, contested environments. Manufactured by Lockheed Martin, the Typhon Weapon System leverages a modular design that allows it to fire various missile types, including SM-6 and Tomahawk missiles.


So why is this a big deal? Simple: because the payload capacity of the tomahawk makes it capable of carrying nuclear warheads. And once launched into Russian air space, Russia has no way of knowing they aren't under nuclear attack. They will have no choice but to respond as if they are.

This is the reason for the Ukraine war - to keep these missiles off the Russian border. If Trump allows them to be sent to Ukraine, I would expect Putin (or Medvedev more likely) to announce that as soon as one is launched from Ukrainian soil, Russia will immediately retaliate by sending a barrage of nuclear tipped missiles into Ukraine.

The next move will be yours, NATO warmogers...

​
​
The reason for this war is the same as for every imperialist war … the rule of finance capital is impossible without imperialist war. In this case, the dependence is direct in that Russia’s primary aim is preventing a socialist revolution by using a war to accomplish regimentation and an anti labor witch hunt, while turning the unemployed with which its prisons are bursting due to capitalism with a self-funding army of plunderers. If Russia’s big aim gad been keeping Ukraine out of NATO, all they had to do was refrain from invading and let the Germans take care of the diplomatic end for them.
 
I see not a peep out of @middleview on this thread. I guess maybe it's taking him a while to come up with an explanation as to why this doesn't prove Putin was 100% correct to fear NATO nukes on his doorstep if Ukraine entered NATO.
 
I have been repeatedly assured by the lefty neocons pimping NATO aggression that there is no way to deploy a missile such as the Tomahawk from a land based launcher, so there is nothing for Russia to fear from having NATO bases ringing its borders. Well, that particular gaslight is now officially burned out. The only way Tomahawks to Ukraine makes sense is if they have a way to launch them from Ukraine (Ukraine does not possess a navy). So what's up?

Of course, as I pointed out when I was being gaslit on this matter, there most certainly is a way to launch tomahawks from land based missile launchers - enter the Typhon:

The Mid-Range Capability (MRC) Typhon is a mobile, ground-launched missile system developed to provide the U.S. Army with enhanced long-range strike capabilities. The system is designed to bridge the gap between shorter-range missile systems and long-range strike assets, allowing for precision targeting in heavily defended, contested environments. Manufactured by Lockheed Martin, the Typhon Weapon System leverages a modular design that allows it to fire various missile types, including SM-6 and Tomahawk missiles.


So why is this a big deal? Simple: because the payload capacity of the tomahawk makes it capable of carrying nuclear warheads. And once launched into Russian air space, Russia has no way of knowing they aren't under nuclear attack. They will have no choice but to respond as if they are.

This is the reason for the Ukraine war - to keep these missiles off the Russian border. If Trump allows them to be sent to Ukraine, I would expect Putin (or Medvedev more likely) to announce that as soon as one is launched from Ukrainian soil, Russia will immediately retaliate by sending a barrage of nuclear tipped missiles into Ukraine.

The next move will be yours, NATO warmogers...

​
​
why would russia be more afraid of ukraine based tomahawks than . . .

1 - US based ICBMs
2 - poseidon nukes on submarines
3 - cruise missiles from destroyers
 
I have been repeatedly assured by the lefty neocons pimping NATO aggression that there is no way to deploy a missile such as the Tomahawk from a land based launcher, so there is nothing for Russia to fear from having NATO bases ringing its borders. Well, that particular gaslight is now officially burned out. The only way Tomahawks to Ukraine makes sense is if they have a way to launch them from Ukraine (Ukraine does not possess a navy). So what's up?

Of course, as I pointed out when I was being gaslit on this matter, there most certainly is a way to launch tomahawks from land based missile launchers - enter the Typhon:

The Mid-Range Capability (MRC) Typhon is a mobile, ground-launched missile system developed to provide the U.S. Army with enhanced long-range strike capabilities. The system is designed to bridge the gap between shorter-range missile systems and long-range strike assets, allowing for precision targeting in heavily defended, contested environments. Manufactured by Lockheed Martin, the Typhon Weapon System leverages a modular design that allows it to fire various missile types, including SM-6 and Tomahawk missiles.


So why is this a big deal? Simple: because the payload capacity of the tomahawk makes it capable of carrying nuclear warheads. And once launched into Russian air space, Russia has no way of knowing they aren't under nuclear attack. They will have no choice but to respond as if they are.

This is the reason for the Ukraine war - to keep these missiles off the Russian border. If Trump allows them to be sent to Ukraine, I would expect Putin (or Medvedev more likely) to announce that as soon as one is launched from Ukrainian soil, Russia will immediately retaliate by sending a barrage of nuclear tipped missiles into Ukraine.

The next move will be yours, NATO warmogers...

​
​
The purpose of the ukrainian war is to blast a fraction of Ukraine to dust and to bomb women and children and civilian infrastructure at random....as a means to prevent NATO encirclement?? Meanwhile while every other country 'encircling' Russia is left alone....

Nah .
 
why would russia be more afraid of ukraine based tomahawks than . . .

1 - US based ICBMs
2 - poseidon nukes on submarines
3 - cruise missiles from destroyers

Because of the swiftness and stealth of a low flying tomahawk launched from a Typhon located less than 500 miles from Moscow. A half dozen tomahawks carrying nuclear warheads could destroy Moscow and the entire surrounding region with little if any warning. No problem, right?
 
Because of the swiftness and stealth of a low flying tomahawk launched from a Typhon located less than 500 miles from Moscow. A half dozen tomahawks carrying nuclear warheads could destroy Moscow and the entire surrounding region with little if any warning. No problem, right?

No way you’re stupid enough to truly believe that Ukraine would launch nukes against Russia. You’re just pretending to be that stupid to boost the Trump/Putin alliance.
 
The purpose of the ukrainian war is to blast a fraction of Ukraine to dust and to bomb women and children and civilian infrastructure at random....as a means to prevent NATO encirclement?? Meanwhile while every other country 'encircling' Russia is left alone....

Nah .

Yeah, proxy wars between military superpowers tend to kill a lot of innocent people. Lets face it, if Ukraine hadn't received over a half trillion of military aid it would have ceased to exist a long time ago. I get it, you are of Ukrainian heritage so this war is worth any and all cost to the US taxpayers, but with pretty near $40 trillion in debt on the books already and adding to it at a rate of $2 trillion a year, as a US taxpayer, I'm thinking we can't really afford to fight Ukraine's war for it.
 
No way you’re stupid enough to truly believe that Ukraine would launch nukes against Russia. You’re just pretending to be that stupid to boost the Trump/Putin alliance.

Where did I say that? Of course, you are lying about my position. What I said was, once tomahawks enter the theatre, with their ability to carry nuclear payloads, Russia would have every right to treat any tomahawk launched in their direction as a nuclear attack, and respond accordingly. Trump is the stupid one if he thinks his threat to give Ukraine tomahawks is going to get Russia to back down. I fully expect Putin will tell him, at their meeting in Budapest, precisely that any tomahawk launched in their direction from anywhere, including Ukraine, will be treated as a nuclear attack. Your move General Cheeto...
 
Last edited:
Yeah, proxy wars between military superpowers tend to kill a lot of innocent people. Let’s face it, if Ukraine hadn't received over a half trillion of military aid it would have ceased to exist a long time ago. I get it, you are of Ukrainian heritage so this war is worth any and all cost to the US taxpayers, but with pretty near $40 trillion in debt on the books already and adding to it at a rate of $2 trillion a year, as a US taxpayer, I'm thinking we can't really afford to fight Ukraine's war for it.
How do you argue that Ukraine is fighting the U.S.’s war for it and that the U.S. is fighting Ukraine’s war for it at the same time? Oh, well, being a statist means never having to say you’re sorry.
 
Where did I say that? Of course, you are lying about my position. What I said was, once tomahawks enter the theatre, with their ability to carry nuclear payloads, Russia would have every right to treat any tomahawk launched in their direction as a nuclear attack, and respond accordingly. Trump is the stupid one if he thinks his threat to give Ukraine tomahawks is going to get Russia to back down. I fully expect Putin will tell him, at their meeting in Budapest, precisely that any tomahawk launched in their direction from anywhere, including Ukraine, will be treated as a nuclear attack. Your move General Cheeto...
Whatever it takes to kill as many Russian's as possible
 
Back
Top