New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Trans-racial v. Trans-gender

Arkady

President
Race and gender are both social constructs. Yet, the mainstream liberal position seems to be that people should be allowed to transition gender freely, but not to do the same with race. I've seen a couple attempts recently to explain this distinction, but they've been poorly written -- mostly avoiding making an argument at all, and instead attacking the motives of anyone who would even draw the comparison. But, just because those who've been offering explanations have been doing a terrible job doesn't mean there isn't a perfectly good case to be made for treating the two things so differently. I'm curious if anyone here has encountered such an explanation.
 
gender is NOT a social construct. It's an outcome of evolution/DNA.

without 2 genders you cannot have the sort of reproduction which faciltates sharing of traits which have survival quality. before "sexual reproduction" the planet existed for hundreds of millions of years with minimal evolutionary progress.

people should be allowed to have sex with other consenting adults.

that said, homosexuality is mental, psychological, or hormonal dysfunction that interferes with reproduction. it's not a "social construct".
 
Back
Top