New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Transcript sanskrit?

PhilFish

Administrator
Staff member
Much to do about the 'hidden transcript'

Yet..there is none.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...nearly-verbatim-not-exact-heres-how-it-works/

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...esidential-conversations-recorded/2438667001/

1. Calls are not recorded. NOt tape, Mp4, or other exists
2. Sometimes relies on the aid of computerized means (Dragon software, etc. Still not recorded.
3. There is not a court stenographer caliber version hidden somewhere
4. NHS assignees (non partisan) are in the room, taking contemporaneous notes
5. Then NHS agents and other officials present work together on a consensus doc.


this is the doc in question. the released version is the version

persons speaking of omissions are either fabricating, lying, and or did not achieve consensus that what they heard was heard by all, or the content was not agreed to by all as relevant enough to commit to the document produced.


attack...
 
persons speaking of omissions are either fabricating, lying, and or did not achieve consensus that what they heard was heard by all, or the content was not agreed to by all as relevant enough to commit to the document produced.
THat's a huge logical leap from the transcript isn't verbatim.
 
Except for all the testimony corroborating the whistleblower complaint doesn't make it a leap.

From Day one the transcript has been marked "Not Verbatim". And Mr. Vindman Corroborated that by stating it was missing sections.

Agree. And as I noted...seems consensus was not to include
 
Except for all the testimony corroborating the whistleblower complaint doesn't make it a leap.

From Day one the transcript has been marked "Not Verbatim". And Mr. Vindman Corroborated that by stating it was missing sections.

"To the best of my recollection, the MemCon accurately and completely reflects the substance of the call.....I want to be clear, I was not concerned that anything illegal was discussed."

This is part of the opening testimony from Tim Morrison who was ON THE CALL. It does not corroborate anything the WB said. What you are doing is propagating alt-left conspiracy theories. Facts matter.
 
"To the best of my recollection, the MemCon accurately and completely reflects the substance of the call.....I want to be clear, I was not concerned that anything illegal was discussed."

This is part of the opening testimony from Tim Morrison who was ON THE CALL. It does not corroborate anything the WB said. What you are doing is propagating alt-left conspiracy theories. Facts matter.
Abusing power is not illegal, but it is impeachable.
 
Is some second, verbatim version going to appear? I agree, probably not.

therefore....an objective assessment is that what was produced was produced by consensus, per existing longstanding process, and reflects accurately what was discussed.

extraneous items omitted.

everything else is suspect.
 
Back
Top