TREASON

[Dawg]

opps.......for Pig In Pant Suits mob

http://yournewswire.com/clinton-employee-arrested-treason/

 

[EatTheRich]

http://www.snopes.com/candace-claiborne-treason/

 

[Tor-Pete-O]

opps.......for Pig In Pant Suits mob

http://yournewswire.com/clinton-employee-arrested-treason/

To quote a famous pastor from Chicago......Obobo's "chickens are coming home to roost!"

About time!

 

[Caroljo]

http://www.snopes.com/candace-claiborne-treason/

So it's pretty much the truth.....she worked for the State Dept all through Obama's Presidency. But of course Snopes said he had nothing to do with it....LMAO!!! Of course he didn't! Snopes is NOT a reliable source for truth.....no fact checker is when it comes to politics!

 

[Deleted member 21794]

opps.......for Pig In Pant Suits mob

http://yournewswire.com/clinton-employee-arrested-treason/

This has GOT be making Cankles a bit nervous.

 

[Deleted member 21794]

http://www.snopes.com/candace-claiborne-treason/

She worked for the State Department. She worked for Hillary.

 

[EatTheRich]

So it's pretty much the truth.....she worked for the State Dept all through Obama's Presidency. But of course Snopes said he had nothing to do with it....LMAO!!! Of course he didn't! Snopes is NOT a reliable source for truth.....no fact checker is when it comes to politics!

The other untruth: that she was charged with treason.

 

[EatTheRich]

She worked for the State Department. She worked for Hillary.

And you think she got orders that came down through her boss from Hillary Clinton's desk to sell information to the Chinese?

 

[Caroljo]

The other untruth: that she was charged with treason.

She hasn't been charged YET. From what she did do, she should be charged. What kind of information was she giving China?

 

[Caroljo]

And you think she got orders that came down through her boss from Hillary Clinton's desk to sell information to the Chinese?

Is there proof she didn't?

 

[EatTheRich]

Is there proof she didn't?

How would I know? I believe people should be considered innocent until proven guilty ... do you?

 

[EatTheRich]

She hasn't been charged YET. From what she did do, she should be charged. What kind of information was she giving China?

You don't know ... but you think she should be charged with treason (defined in the Constitution as "living war against the United States, or giving aid and comfort to its enemies") anyway ... although China is not the U.S.'s enemy.

 

[Deleted member 21794]

And you think she got orders that came down through her boss from Hillary Clinton's desk to sell information to the Chinese?

I have no idea. In fact, I doubt it. However, I suspect crooked Hillary created a somewhat permissive atmosphere with regards to this type of activity.

 

[Deleted member 21794]

You don't know ... but you think she should be charged with treason (defined in the Constitution as "living war against the United States, or giving aid and comfort to its enemies") anyway ... although China is not the U.S.'s enemy.

I think decent arguments can be made as to whether China is an enemy. Mortal enemy? Absolutely not. Enemy with regards to differences in government and human rights? Absolutely.

I think we would need specifics on what information the woman being charged with passed on to the Chinese. If it was military/national security in nature, that may be treason.

I am fine with not calling it treason at this point. That's not the charge and we don't know exactly what information was passed.

 

[Dawg]

more Treason
http://www.usapoliticstoday.com/oba.../?utm_source=CP&utm_medium=CP&utm_campaign=CP