Trump: BTW, Muslim judges can't hear my cases either

[Bugsy McGurk]

Donald Trump's America: Divide people into ethnic and religious groups, and each of us gets to decide which groups one can disqualify.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/05/politics/donald-trump-muslim-judge/

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Donald Trump's America: Divide people into ethnic and religious groups, and each of us gets to decide which groups one can disqualify.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/05/politics/donald-trump-muslim-judge/

The Rule of Law Is the Law of the Rulers

Judge Gonzalo belongs to a Latino lawyer group, which itself is a disqualifying bias. In addition, that seditious organization paid for the American college education of an illegal alien. In a patriotic country, the whole group would be disbarred for such disrespect of the law.

 

[UPNYA2]

Donald Trump's America: Divide people into ethnic and religious groups, and each of us gets to decide which groups one can disqualify.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/05/politics/donald-trump-muslim-judge/

Like this Buggy:

US Supreme Court upends all-white jury verdict, death sentence for Georgia man
By Mark ShermanAssociated Press – published Monday, May 23, 2016
1 comments
WASHINGTON | The Supreme Court upended the conviction and death sentence of a black Georgia man Monday because prosecutors violated the Constitution by excluding African-Americans from the all-white jury that determined his fate.

I mean, we are supposed to receive a trial with a jury of our peers are we not? So, what, whites are not the peers of blacks? Blacks are not the peers of whites? How many blacks and how many whites must serve on a jury in order for their decision to be acceptable during the trial of a black man anyway?

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

Like this Buggy:

US Supreme Court upends all-white jury verdict, death sentence for Georgia man
By Mark ShermanAssociated Press – published Monday, May 23, 2016
1 comments
WASHINGTON | The Supreme Court upended the conviction and death sentence of a black Georgia man Monday because prosecutors violated the Constitution by excluding African-Americans from the all-white jury that determined his fate.

I mean, we are supposed to receive a trial with a jury of our peers are we not? So, what, whites are not the peers of blacks? Blacks are not the peers of whites? How many blacks and how many whites must serve on a jury in order for their decision to be acceptable during the trial of a black man anyway?

Crikey. Your GOP ADD is running wild.

Let me know if you can focus on the topic.

 

[UPNYA2]

Crikey. Your GOP ADD is running wild.

Let me know if you can focus on the topic.

HUH?

Your top post was about dividing people into ethnic and religious groups, and how each of us gets to decide which groups one can disqualify, that IS what you posted, yes?

Now granted you did refer to that as "Donald Trump's America", but it was that very statement that I was disputing by showing you a different instance of our judicial system being separated into groups by race and how a courts decision was reversed based upon that racial difference.

Sounds just like someone picked a group and disqualified them from participating in the judicial process based upon nothing other than their race, what say ye to that?

Oh..................And you can bet your sweet bippy it had nothing to do with Trump, sport.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

HUH?

Your top post was about dividing people into ethnic and religious groups, and how each of us gets to decide which groups one can disqualify, that IS what you posted, yes?

Now granted you did refer to that as "Donald Trump's America", but it was that very statement that I was disputing by showing you a different instance of our judicial system being separated into groups by race and how a courts decision was reversed based upon that racial difference.

Sounds just like someone picked a group and disqualified them from participating in the judicial process based upon nothing other than their race, what say ye to that?

Oh..................And you can bet your sweet bippy it had nothing to do with Trump, sport.

Actually, in that case it was the prosecutor (the government) that discriminated based on race. Trump-like bigotry.

Anyway, let me know if you can focus on the topic.

 

[UPNYA2]

Actually, in that case it was the prosecutor (the government) that discriminated based on race. Trump-like bigotry.

Anyway, let me know if you can focus on the topic.

Again, HUH?

" the prosecutor (the government) that discriminated based on race"???????????

How? By having the defense agree to an all white jury? (Yeah, buggy, the defense gets a say in who serves too, you should take a day and go watch a trial or two, it MIGHT help.)

Are blacks not the equals of whites? Are all US citizens equal, peers in other words? If not, why?

But ok, IF the prosecutor (the government) discriminated based on race, how many blacks will it take to serve on a jury for it to not be discrimination? Should the judge too be the same race as the defendant? To ensure everything is "fair" I mean............


Stupid a ss...................... Arguing that it is ok to overrule a verdict because the jury and defendant were not the same race in a post where you are trying to put down another for acting as if a trial with a judge and a defend and of differing ethnic backgrounds might involve some bias.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

Again, HUH?

" the prosecutor (the government) that discriminated based on race"???????????

How? By having the defense agree to an all white jury? (Yeah, buggy, the defense gets a say in who serves too, you should take a day and go watch a trial or two, it MIGHT help.)

Are blacks not the equals of whites? Are all US citizens equal, peers in other words? If not, why?

But ok, IF the prosecutor (the government) discriminated based on race, how many blacks will it take to serve on a jury for it to not be discrimination? Should the judge too be the same race as the defendant? To ensure everything is "fair" I mean............


Stupid a ss...................... Arguing that it is ok to overrule a verdict because the jury and defendant were not the same race in a post where you are trying to put down another for acting as if a trial with a judge and a defend and of differing ethnic backgrounds might involve some bias.

You're not bright enough to try to argue analogies - you're all over the place. You should just focus on the topics. At least try.

 

[worldlymrb]

I'm sure Hillary won't complain when she's indicted for felonies (Trump is Civil/NOT Criminal), standing in front of a White Babtist judge with a Bible once owned by a Confederate General on his desk and just went hunting with Ted Nugent.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Crikey. Your GOP ADD is running wild.

Let me know if you can focus on the topic.

Share and Sharia Alike

I forgot that we were discussing how much penance Trump should do as he kneels before the priests of PC. Sackcloth and ashes? Fifty lashes from Dominatrix Hillary?

 

[4/15]

Donald Trump's America: Divide people into ethnic and religious groups, and each of us gets to decide which groups one can disqualify.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/05/politics/donald-trump-muslim-judge/

Rumpy dump seems to think, not really, that he can buy/do what ever he wants and then get to pick who will judge him ( get the payoff).

 

[Deleted member 21794]

Donald Trump's America: Divide people into ethnic and religious groups, and each of us gets to decide which groups one can disqualify.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/06/05/politics/donald-trump-muslim-judge/

When do you plan on posting the part about him saying Muslim judges can't hear his cases?

Do you think it's possible a Muslim judge could be biased against Trump?

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

When do you plan on posting the part about him saying Muslim judges can't hear his cases?

Do you think it's possible a Muslim judge could be biased against Trump?

It's possible any judge could be biased against anybody, and the remedy for that is to file a motion seeking to have the judge removed from the case. Trump's lawyers have not done that. Rather, Trump's lawyer was interviewed after Trump's setback in the case, and he did not even raise a hint of bias. Indeed, legal analysis of the ruling Trump is bitching about confirms that the judge made the correct ruling.

And what did Trump do instead? Loudly squawk that the judge is biased because "he's a Mexican."

Truly horrendous stuff. Which you support.

 

[Saladin2]

Trump needs an angry uneducated white man as a Judge.....Somebody like one of the idiots that goes to his hate rally's

 

[BobbyT]

The Rule of Law Is the Law of the Rulers

Judge Gonzalo belongs to a Latino lawyer group, which itself is a disqualifying bias. In addition, that seditious organization paid for the American college education of an illegal alien. In a patriotic country, the whole group would be disbarred for such disrespect of the law.

Should a woman judge having volunteered for the rape crises center be disqualified from adjudicating rape cases? Should a Catholic lawyer be disqualified fro adjudicating suits against Catholics?

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Should a woman judge having volunteered for the rape crises center be disqualified from adjudicating rape cases?

Don't Expect President Trump to Let Bygones Be Bygones


Sure, if the femininny judge had advised her clients how to fake sexual harassment in order to win lucrative lawsuits. LULAC and La Raza abet illegal immigration and should be severely punished under the RICO act. Trump will do that and will be applauded for getting rid of judges, lawyers, and organizations that are destroying America.