New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Trump "Obstruction" - doesn't exist

Jen

Senator

(Op Ed by Alan M. Dershowitz, Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law)

"In his testimony former FBI director James Comey echoed a view that I alone have been expressing for several weeks, and that has been attacked by nearly every Democratic pundit.


Comey confirmed that under our Constitution, the president has the authority to direct the FBI to stop investigating any individual. I paraphrase, because the transcript is not yet available: the president can, in theory, decide who to investigate, who to stop investigating, who to prosecute and who not to prosecute. The president is the head of the unified executive branch of government, and the Justice Department and the FBI work under him and he may order them to do what he wishes.


As a matter of law, Comey is 100 percent correct. As I have long argued, and as Comey confirmed in his written statement, our history shows that many presidents—from Adams to Jefferson, to Lincoln, to Roosevelt, to Kennedy, to Bush 1, and to Obama – have directed the Justice Department with regard to ongoing investigations. The history is clear, the precedents are clear, the constitutional structure is clear, and common sense is clear.


Yet virtually every Democratic pundit, in their haste to “get” President Trump, has willfully ignored these realities. In doing so they have endangered our civil liberties and constitutional rights."


Democratic talking heads and Congressional idiots need to move on. Time to look at the needs of the nation and walk away from their perceived election unfairness. The election is over. The Russians didn't succeed if they attempted to have an effect on the outcome. Trump is President. There are real issues to deal with.
 
democrat dead-enders are going to claim - forever - that Comey was somehow bribed or intimidated.

just as bush/gore election dead enders remain convinced that Gore won Florida, and the white house.

before Trump was even inaugurated, I posted that he should dismiss comey. for incompetence on the Hillary investigation.

what a different world we'd be in today if Trump had actually done that.

I realize the FBI head is not a "political appointment". But by trying to create goodwill by accommodating some Obama era appointments, Trump has enabled all manner of "deep state" leaking of phone calls and confidential info from the FBI and DOJ.
 
democrat dead-enders are going to claim - forever - that Comey was somehow bribed or intimidated.

just as bush/gore election dead enders remain convinced that Gore won Florida, and the white house.

before Trump was even inaugurated, I posted that he should dismiss comey. for incompetence on the Hillary investigation.

what a different world we'd be in today if Trump had actually done that.

I realize the FBI head is not a "political appointment". But by trying to create goodwill by accommodating some Obama era appointments, Trump has enabled all manner of "deep state" leaking of phone calls and confidential info from the FBI and DOJ.
I agree - and also posted before the inauguration - that one of the first things Trump should do was to fire Comey. I have no idea why he didn't.
 
(Op Ed by Alan M. Dershowitz, Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law)
"In his testimony former FBI director James Comey echoed a view that I alone have been expressing for several weeks, and that has been attacked by nearly every Democratic pundit.


Comey confirmed that under our Constitution, the president has the authority to direct the FBI to stop investigating any individual. I paraphrase, because the transcript is not yet available: the president can, in theory, decide who to investigate, who to stop investigating, who to prosecute and who not to prosecute. The president is the head of the unified executive branch of government, and the Justice Department and the FBI work under him and he may order them to do what he wishes.


As a matter of law, Comey is 100 percent correct. As I have long argued, and as Comey confirmed in his written statement, our history shows that many presidents—from Adams to Jefferson, to Lincoln, to Roosevelt, to Kennedy, to Bush 1, and to Obama – have directed the Justice Department with regard to ongoing investigations. The history is clear, the precedents are clear, the constitutional structure is clear, and common sense is clear.


Yet virtually every Democratic pundit, in their haste to “get” President Trump, has willfully ignored these realities. In doing so they have endangered our civil liberties and constitutional rights."


Democratic talking heads and Congressional idiots need to move on. Time to look at the needs of the nation and walk away from their perceived election unfairness. The election is over. The Russians didn't succeed if they attempted to have an effect on the outcome. Trump is President. There are real issues to deal with.
Alan Dershowitz also stated that OJ Simpson didn't kill his ex wife. But we know better, don't we? He has been defending Trump all along and pretending he isn't. Kinda like a lot of PJ cons do here.

As far as your top statement or Dershowitz' statement, that hasn't been decided yet.
Just like the collusion between the Trump staff and Russia. This investigation is just beginning. Putting the cart before the horse might not be a smart thing to do.
 
(Op Ed by Alan M. Dershowitz, Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law)
"In his testimony former FBI director James Comey echoed a view that I alone have been expressing for several weeks, and that has been attacked by nearly every Democratic pundit.


Comey confirmed that under our Constitution, the president has the authority to direct the FBI to stop investigating any individual. I paraphrase, because the transcript is not yet available: the president can, in theory, decide who to investigate, who to stop investigating, who to prosecute and who not to prosecute. The president is the head of the unified executive branch of government, and the Justice Department and the FBI work under him and he may order them to do what he wishes.


As a matter of law, Comey is 100 percent correct. As I have long argued, and as Comey confirmed in his written statement, our history shows that many presidents—from Adams to Jefferson, to Lincoln, to Roosevelt, to Kennedy, to Bush 1, and to Obama – have directed the Justice Department with regard to ongoing investigations. The history is clear, the precedents are clear, the constitutional structure is clear, and common sense is clear.


Yet virtually every Democratic pundit, in their haste to “get” President Trump, has willfully ignored these realities. In doing so they have endangered our civil liberties and constitutional rights."


Democratic talking heads and Congressional idiots need to move on. Time to look at the needs of the nation and walk away from their perceived election unfairness. The election is over. The Russians didn't succeed if they attempted to have an effect on the outcome. Trump is President. There are real issues to deal with.

There never was any collusion.

Butthurt Democrats will find something else to obsess and rant hysterically over, though. :rolleyes:
 
Alan Dershowitz also stated that OJ Simpson didn't kill his ex wife. But we know better, don't we? He has been defending Trump all along and pretending he isn't. Kinda like a lot of PJ cons do here.

As far as your top statement or Dershowitz' statement, that hasn't been decided yet.
Just like the collusion between the Trump staff and Russia. This investigation is just beginning. Putting the cart before the horse might not be a smart thing to do.
IT'S NOT LIKE YOU WERE'NT WARNED ABOUT THE NOTHING BURGER AND FAKE NEWS YOU ATE.
 
Back
Top