Trumpstench: US Attorney edition

[Bugsy McGurk]

Here's a piece about Trump taking the unusual step of personally interviewing US attorneys.

He did so as to the US attorneys who have jurisdiction in NY and Washington, DC - the places where US attorneys would be most likely to investigate matters involving Trump, his clan, and his cronies.

And we know what Trump does when he speaks to such people. With James Comey, for example, he repeatedly pressed Comey for his pledge of personal loyalty to Trump, when such people are supposed to be loyal only to the Constitution.

Trumpstench - it can be overpowering to the senses.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/20/opini...inion/?iid=ob_mobile_article_footer_expansion

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Trumpstench - it can be overpowering to the senses.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/20/opini...inion/?iid=ob_mobile_article_footer_expansion

Your most acute sense is nonsense.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

Your most acute sense is nonsense.

You know how shocked I always am when you wingers ignore the rampant Trumpstench.

What's your secret? A gas mask?

;-)

 

[UPNYA2]

Here's a piece about Trump taking the unusual step of personally interviewing US attorneys.

He did so as to the US attorneys who have jurisdiction in NY and Washington, DC - the places where US attorneys would be most likely to investigate matters involving Trump, his clan, and his cronies.

And we know what Trump does when he speaks to such people. With James Comey, for example, he repeatedly pressed Comey for his pledge of personal loyalty to Trump, when such people are supposed to be loyal only to the Constitution.

Trumpstench - it can be overpowering to the senses.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/20/opini...inion/?iid=ob_mobile_article_footer_expansion

"Here's a piece about Trump taking the unusual step of personally interviewing US attorneys."

Damn, bugeye, you down to "unusual" sh it to whimper about now?

What, you lose contact with your di m/ l ibby massas who spoon feed you Trump hate and "illegal" activities to run around puking back up everywhere or what?

Take a break. Wait for at least another implied "crime" for God's sake. Every time you try to venture out on your own, try to act as if you had an actual original thought you wind up painting yourself out as being about as bright as..........well.........pretty much every other d im hack.

Something I like doing. So please refrain from stealing my thunder, clabberhead.

 

[Arkady]

Here's a piece about Trump taking the unusual step of personally interviewing US attorneys.

He did so as to the US attorneys who have jurisdiction in NY and Washington, DC - the places where US attorneys would be most likely to investigate matters involving Trump, his clan, and his cronies.

And we know what Trump does when he speaks to such people. With James Comey, for example, he repeatedly pressed Comey for his pledge of personal loyalty to Trump, when such people are supposed to be loyal only to the Constitution.

Trumpstench - it can be overpowering to the senses.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/10/20/opini...inion/?iid=ob_mobile_article_footer_expansion

Employers should keep track of which attorneys actually made it through the process, and then avoid them like the plague, when they're done working in government. Getting past a Trump job interview is basically an admission of corruption... anyone would be a fool to trust the kind of lawyer who'd tell Trump the things Trump needs to hear to approve of hiring them. Those people should be viewed as irredeemably tainted for the rest of their careers.

By comparison, anyone who applies and doesn't get hired, despite a solid resume, probably said something suggesting he has actual ethics, and thus disqualified himself, and so such lawyers should be viewed as having polished their credentials by way of the rejection.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

You know how shocked I always am when you wingers ignore the rampant Trumpstench.

What's your secret? A gas mask?

;-)

Your illusions are produced in an olfactory factory.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

"Here's a piece about Trump taking the unusual step of personally interviewing US attorneys."

Damn, bugeye, you down to "unusual" sh it to whimper about now?

What, you lose contact with your di m/ l ibby massas who spoon feed you Trump hate and "illegal" activities to run around puking back up everywhere or what?

Take a break. Wait for at least another implied "crime" for God's sake. Every time you try to venture out on your own, try to act as if you had an actual original thought you wind up painting yourself out as being about as bright as..........well.........pretty much every other d im hack.

Something I like doing. So please refrain from stealing my thunder, clabberhead.

That's how low wingers have sunk - cheering as Trump personally interviews the US attorneys who will make decisions on whether to prosecute Trump, his clan, and his cronies.

Banana Republicans.

;-)

 

[Dawg]

Yes, it's much better to ask top dem/libs of each state who should be appointed:

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=99881017

what difference does it make

if repub was top stae leader, O went to top dem/lib and you're whining of what ?

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

Yes, it's much better to ask top dem/libs of each state who should be appointed:

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=99881017

what difference does it make

if repub was top stae leader, O went to top dem/lib and you're whining of what ?

Dunno what you're yapping about, but it's not the topic.

Focus on the topic, if possible.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Dunno what you're yapping about, but it's not the topic.

Focus on the topic, if possible.

A Thread Is Not a Tightrope