Violence?

[Zam-Zam]

So, A Democrat president prepares for his fellow Democrats to possibly commit acts of violence...Naturally, this will cause Democrats here to want to talk about how awful Republicans are.

 

[EatTheRich]

So, A Democrat president prepares for his fellow Democrats to possibly commit acts of violence...Naturally, this will cause Democrats here to want to talk about how awful Republicans are.

More accurately, a Democrat president prepares to force tyranny down the throats of the people despite the resistance of the large leftist majority, betraying once again that this country has two hard-right parties.

 

[LeilaniMP]

The Biden team seems to think that's a possibility:


President Biden's administration is bracing for a wave of violence from pro-choice activists if the Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade in June, Axios reported Wednesday.

A leaked May 13 memo from the Department of Homeland Security reportedly details ongoing investigations into threats to "burn down or storm" the Supreme Court building, according to Axios. Threats against the court arose last month after a draft majority opinion overturning Roe v. Wade leaked to the press. The Supreme Court is expected to hand down the ruling next month.


Roe v. Wade ruling has Biden administration bracing for wave of violence: report | Fox News

They're going to foment the violence. As usual.

 

[Bugsy McGurk]

Sure, most violent protestors carry placards. In fact, I'm sure they have their ID hanging just under their masks.

LOL

Correct. They do. Example:

 

[JuliefromOhio]

How about if women and all the good men.....did this? We'd solve two problems.

 

[Zam-Zam]

More accurately, a Democrat president prepares to force tyranny down the throats of the people despite the resistance of the large leftist majority, betraying once again that this country has two hard-right parties.

So, by getting violent they are exercising their rights?

Not true anywhere on this planet.

 

[Spamature]

So, A Democrat president prepares for his fellow Democrats to possibly commit acts of violence...Naturally, this will cause Democrats here to want to talk about how awful Republicans are.

You say that...

Because only Dems are pro-choice ?
Or ?
Because Republicans have no history when it comes to acts of violence surrounding this issue of abortion ?

 

[EatTheRich]

So, by getting violent they are exercising their rights?

Not true anywhere on this planet.

The only indication of violence is a prognostication by navel gazers in Biden’s cabinet based on sheer speculation. Anyway, the U.S. was founded on the principle that when a government becomes destructive of human rights, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it by any means necessary.

 

[Zam-Zam]

You say that...

Because only Dems are pro-choice ?
Or ?
Because Republicans have no history when it comes to acts of violence surrounding this issue of abortion ?

No.

I say it because it's a news story.

 

[Zam-Zam]

The only indication of violence is a prognostication by navel gazers in Biden’s cabinet based on sheer speculation. Anyway, the U.S. was founded on the principle that when a government becomes destructive of human rights, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it by any means necessary.

Which is not quite the same thing as resorting to violence every time you don't get your way.

That is not justified.

 

[Spamature]

No.

I say it because it's a news story.

It's a story, whether it's news or not, is questionable.
But when party leaders are supporting violence, now that's a news story.

Republicans vow to kill domestic terrorism bill in Senate

 

[EatTheRich]

Which is not quite the same thing as resorting to violence every time you don't get your way.

That is not justified.

Here we’re talking about a government becoming destructive of basic human rights.

 

[EatTheRich]

It's a story, whether it's news or not, is questionable.
But when party leaders are supporting violence, now that's a news story.

Republicans vow to kill domestic terrorism bill in Senate

Good for them. The secret police shouldn’t be given new powers under any pretext.

 

[Spamature]

Good for them. The secret police shouldn’t be given new powers under any pretext.

Secret traitors are creating new powers for themselves over our elections as we speak based upon lies they made up. They did it in part through intimidation and threats to local government officials. Their attempt to directly overthrow the govt. was an act of terrorism that may have been planned at the highest levels of govt.

You can talk about revolution, but do your thought run to putting guns on the streets.
Because theirs, in the end, most definitely revolve around putting those guns on our streets. They have never told us any different from that. What did you think all that 2nd amend crap and separatist militia training is for ?

What should we do ?

Just watch like we did with Roe, or as they openly rig the next elections within the states they control for Trump and his hand chosen minions ?

 

[EatTheRich]

“May have been planned at the highest levels of government” and you want to give them more powers to spy on us? Yes, we need guns. We need to get class-struggle leaderships in the unions and trained militia organized by unions or workers’ councils to prepare for coming battles with not just the far right but with the state. We need workers’ and soldiers’ councils and we need a vanguard party to give us the political leadership that can make the coming capitalist dictatorship … which at this point is inevitable … as anodyne as possible, while organizing for the triumph of socialism after that dictatorship sweeps away the remaining foundations of capitalist rule.

 

[Zam-Zam]

It's a story, whether it's news or not, is questionable.
But when party leaders are supporting violence, now that's a news story.

Republicans vow to kill domestic terrorism bill in Senate

Threadjack attempt.

Fail.

 

[Zam-Zam]

Here we’re talking about a government becoming destructive of basic human rights.

No, we are not.

If the Supreme Court were to strike down Roe v. Wade (which they have not, just more 'navel gazing' as you say), it would not ban abortion in America - It would simply defer the issue to individual states.

That's a long, long way from tyranny.

 

[EatTheRich]

No, we are not.

If the Supreme Court were to strike down Roe v. Wade (which they have not, just more 'navel gazing' as you say), it would not ban abortion in America - It would simply defer the issue to individual states.

That's a long, long way from tyranny.

Giving the states the power to write tyrannical law is very much inviting tyranny.

 

[Spamature]

Threadjack attempt.

Fail.

Biden is trying to predict your actions and preven them, but no,
you wingers just want to make sure your violent mobs are interferred with by law enforcement.

I hope you fail.

 

[Zam-Zam]

Giving the states the power to write tyrannical law is very much inviting tyranny.

No.

You're just whining.