New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Wake up!


Funny stuff - by REPUBLICANS for REPUBLICANS

The Lincoln Project-- HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

And you wonder why conservatives know you liberals are stupid. Who believes this crap?

(I see why you like granting yourself the ability to just dictate to everyone what is or is not an acceptable source!)
 
The Lincoln Project-- HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

And you wonder why conservatives know you liberals are stupid. Who believes this crap?

(I see why you like granting yourself the ability to just dictate to everyone what is or is not an acceptable source!)

Feel free to do the same. I don't care. I have no respect for the stupidity of today's conservatives so I couldn't care less what you believe or not. My siggie shows many of the sources that the slowbussers here rely on for their arguments.

But by the way the Lincoln Project is a REPUBLICAN organization.
 
Feel free to do the same. I don't care. I have no respect for the stupidity of today's conservatives so I couldn't care less what you believe or not. My siggie shows many of the sources that the slowbussers here rely on for their arguments.

But by the way the Lincoln Project is a REPUBLICAN organization.

I know they are but if they say something I don't like or disagree with I am just going to ignore the content and put down the source, just like you do.

All those sources you refuse to accept because they present stuff you don't like can still present truths or facts as well as opinions. Doesn't matter to you. If they said water is wet and that would contradict something you think or feel you would ignore or even ridicule anyone who showed it to you.

It is easier than actually trying to disprove a truth, hence a favorite "weapon" for weak minded dems/libs. As is demonstrated on here daily.
 
I know they are but if they say something I don't like or disagree with I am just going to ignore the content and put down the source, just like you do.

All those sources you refuse to accept because they present stuff you don't like can still present truths or facts as well as opinions. Doesn't matter to you. If they said water is wet and that would contradict something you think or feel you would ignore or even ridicule anyone who showed it to you.

It is easier than actually trying to disprove a truth, hence a favorite "weapon" for weak minded dems/libs. As is demonstrated on here daily.

Nope - Righties can make up lies faster than intelligent people can debunk them. Therefore I will not respond to any story sourced by one of your disinformation sites. You want a comment from me - post from a responsible source.

If you think I have posted from an unreliable source feel free to ignore the story or belittle the source. You are free to do that. Just like you are free to go to a Trump rally without a mask like Herman Cain did. 'Murica.

I have very little tolerance for stupidy. That's why I am so short with your right wingers.
 
Nope - Righties can make up lies faster than intelligent people can debunk them. Therefore I will not respond to any story sourced by one of your disinformation sites. You want a comment from me - post from a responsible source.

If you think I have posted from an unreliable source feel free to ignore the story or belittle the source. You are free to do that. Just like you are free to go to a Trump rally without a mask like Herman Cain did. 'Murica.

I have very little tolerance for stupidy. That's why I am so short with your right wingers.

Perhaps you could be so kind as to just go ahead and present us all with a list of your "responsible sources" BEFORE someone dares post something you don't like?

It might make you look a tiny bit less petty.

Might.
 
Perhaps you could be so kind as to just go ahead and present us all with a list of your "responsible sources" BEFORE someone dares post something you don't like?

It might make you look a tiny bit less petty.

Might.

That's not my job. Feel free to make up your own list if you'd like. If you don't have the intellectual capability to tell the difference between real news and idiot sources then I can't help you too much.

But I have helped you to avoid posting nonsence. If it comes from one of my sources listed in my siggie - it's crap.
 
That's not my job. Feel free to make up your own list if you'd like. If you don't have the intellectual capability to tell the difference between real news and idiot sources then I can't help you too much.

But I have helped you to avoid posting nonsence. If it comes from one of my sources listed in my siggie - it's crap.

Soooooo………Now you are telling us all that when we read on breitbart this morning;

"Speaking to reporters after the Lakers victory over the Clippers, James tried to encapsulate what the night meant for him.

“I hope we made Kaep proud. I hope we continue to make Kaep proud every single day. I hope I make him proud with how I live my life, not only on the basketball floor but off the floor,” James said of the NFL’s original anthem protester. “I’ve been one to always speak out about things that I feel like is unjust. If I’m educated on things, I always go about it that way. So Kaep was someone who stood up when times weren’t comfortable, and people didn’t understand or refused to listen to what he was saying.”


that it is all "CRAP"? Lebron really doesn't hope he pleased klapernick?


Good to know...…….
 
Feel free to do the same. I don't care. I have no respect for the stupidity of today's conservatives so I couldn't care less what you believe or not. My siggie shows many of the sources that the slowbussers here rely on for their arguments.

But by the way the Lincoln Project is a REPUBLICAN organization.

It's a bunch of butt-hurt, unemployed never-Trumpers who've been thoroughly debunked. Just like your posts.
 
Last edited:
Soooooo………Now you are telling us all that when we read on breitbart this morning;

"Speaking to reporters after the Lakers victory over the Clippers, James tried to encapsulate what the night meant for him.

“I hope we made Kaep proud. I hope we continue to make Kaep proud every single day. I hope I make him proud with how I live my life, not only on the basketball floor but off the floor,” James said of the NFL’s original anthem protester. “I’ve been one to always speak out about things that I feel like is unjust. If I’m educated on things, I always go about it that way. So Kaep was someone who stood up when times weren’t comfortable, and people didn’t understand or refused to listen to what he was saying.”


that it is all "CRAP"? Lebron really doesn't hope he pleased klapernick?


Good to know...…….


Breitbart - HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Find the story on a real news site.
 
Breitbart - HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Find the story on a real news site.

UPI Sports

CBS Sports

CNN

The Washington Posthttps://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2020/07/31/lebron-james-salutes-colin-kaepernick-inspiring-nbas-national-anthem-demonstration/


Every fukin' one of them has the exact same article and photo as the one on brinbart.

EVERY one.

Yet only ONE is deemed to be "crap" by you. Because, as I said earlier and you insist on constantly confirming is that to the weak of mind it is easier to just deny anything because of where it came from that to try to argue the facts and truth.

You have been weighed, you have been measured and you have been found wanting.
 
UPI Sports

CBS Sports

CNN

The Washington Posthttps://www.washingtonpost.com/sports/2020/07/31/lebron-james-salutes-colin-kaepernick-inspiring-nbas-national-anthem-demonstration/


Every fukin' one of them has the exact same article and photo as the one on brinbart.

EVERY one.

Yet only ONE is deemed to be "crap" by you. Because, as I said earlier and you insist on constantly confirming is that to the weak of mind it is easier to just deny anything because of where it came from that to try to argue the facts and truth.

You have been weighed, you have been measured and you have been found wanting.

You really are not very bright. I pointed out that IF breitbart or one of your other trash sites has a true story (a big if) then other real news media will reported. You proved my point.
 
You really are not very bright. I pointed out that IF breitbart or one of your other trash sites has a true story (a big if) then other real news media will reported. You proved my point.

No, you continue to make my point.

My point is that in any debate one party makes a point to which the other makes a counterpoint and so forth and so on. On here, if a poster presents a story you do not like or can not argue then YOU should search for other sources.

If you can find no others, THEN you question the legitimatize of the presented story, NOT the entire source. The the poster could go find another one, and on and on you can go. It is not the place of one poster to look for a story only from a source that has your approval. It is YOUR place to destroy the subject matter or prove it incorrect, not to just ignore it because of where it is written.

If everyone on here used your criteria no one could ever debate any subject. Everyone would just ignore each other's post until we all used one source. One that YOU would have to dictate to all no doubt.

Also, what if a story can only be found in certain sources you refuse to accept because you feel they are biased, not on one you approve of, because the one's you approve of are in fact biased themselves, only in an opposite manner?

If some sources you do not accept are biased to the right, isn't it completely reasonable to assume that sources biased to the left will not carry the same stories?

And because they do not, you, in all of your self-professed "uber-enlightenment", elect to use THAT as your criteria for determining the worthiness of a source.

Like trying to deal with a child. Can't convince you that in spite of the admiration you have for yourself you simply do not get to dictate for all what is and what is not a legitimate news source.

As is stated in your sig:

"These are not legitimate news sources - "

Again, found wanting...…….
 
No, you continue to make my point.

My point is that in any debate one party makes a point to which the other makes a counterpoint and so forth and so on. On here, if a poster presents a story you do not like or can not argue then YOU should search for other sources.

If you can find no others, THEN you question the legitimatize of the presented story, NOT the entire source. The the poster could go find another one, and on and on you can go. It is not the place of one poster to look for a story only from a source that has your approval. It is YOUR place to destroy the subject matter or prove it incorrect, not to just ignore it because of where it is written.

If everyone on here used your criteria no one could ever debate any subject. Everyone would just ignore each other's post until we all used one source. One that YOU would have to dictate to all no doubt.

Also, what if a story can only be found in certain sources you refuse to accept because you feel they are biased, not on one you approve of, because the one's you approve of are in fact biased themselves, only in an opposite manner?

If some sources you do not accept are biased to the right, isn't it completely reasonable to assume that sources biased to the left will not carry the same stories?

And because they do not, you, in all of your self-professed "uber-enlightenment", elect to use THAT as your criteria for determining the worthiness of a source.

Like trying to deal with a child. Can't convince you that in spite of the admiration you have for yourself you simply do not get to dictate for all what is and what is not a legitimate news source.

As is stated in your sig:

"These are not legitimate news sources - "

Again, found wanting...…….


I am not debating anyone that considers sites like Breitbart to be a legitimate source of news.

I am laughing at you for being dumb enough to rely on sites like that. If you don't like it then don't interact with me. I certainly don't care. I'll be glad to point out the foolishness of your sources.
 
I am not debating anyone that considers sites like Breitbart to be a legitimate source of news.

I am laughing at you for being dumb enough to rely on sites like that. If you don't like it then don't interact with me. I certainly don't care. I'll be glad to point out the foolishness of your sources.

" I'll be glad to point out the foolishness of your sources."

Damned right you would.

Because if I ever did present you with an article you as others have done, you would be incapable of arguing, disproving or denying the actual STORY!

Tootles...……..
 
Back
Top