Days
Commentator
The real story of 09/11 isn't the events themselves, or the massive evidence of a government conspiracy, the real story of what happened on 09/11 began with the immediate reporting and continues to this day with the mass media. The deliberate lies broadcast on 09/11, prepared for broadcast and read LIVE on the air, and the media black out of all the massive evidence... that's the story of what happened on 09/11... that's way bigger than the black op which we still are fitting the pieces together.
You are aware that the story of wtc7 collapsing hit the airwaves a half hour before the building was razed? Copy was already written and was being read on LIVE television that wtc7 has collapsed... except wtc7 was still standing.
You are aware that the mass media reported that jets crashed into the ground in Pennsylvania and into the Pentagon? That the mass media has maintained that bold faced Lie for over ten years, even though no jets crashed in Pennsylvania and into the Pentagon?
The ability to float complete and full falsehoods, conceived in advance, and maintained against all evidence for years on end, in the entire mainstream media... that's the real story of 09/11.
When the message is controlled
How did the fires start on floors so far apart on WTC7? We are told that falling debris from the towers did that. But the towers fell in the morning, while the fires at wtc7 were set in the afternoon. FEMA had already evacuated the entire building, now they refused to allow the firemen access. It was common knowledge on the street that they were going to pull the building, so videos with the firemen in the foreground watching it go down, just shrugged; they were waiting for it to happen. Meanwhile, the masters of propaganda were already busy changing the message. All day, all the networks talked about was bombs going off and the probability of demolition.
So the message needed to be changed; now it stressed that this was a natural collapse, caused by fires, set by debris from the towers falling. So, urgent was the need to change the message, that the FOX news already had the analysis in hand, explaining how wtc7 collapsed, and they were reporting it on air, before wtc7 had even gone down. "We are told that this was a structural failure" ... prepared and written in advance, even though wtc7 hasn't even gone down yet.
Watch this clip of the LIVE reporting from 09/11/2001, the anchors already have copy in front of them, so they think they are reporting on an event that just happened. They throw up a LIVE feed of Manhattan, so they assume the smoke from wtc7 fires is the smoke from it's collapse. But when they witness the collapse of the building, they immediately recalculate that what they had actually been watching was the clip of it's earlier collapse. Unwittingly, FOX recorded the collapse with a LIVE feed, they actually had the story before it happened. (Now if they would only give us the results at the horse track the same way.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHFdcPv3XXI
You are aware that the story of wtc7 collapsing hit the airwaves a half hour before the building was razed? Copy was already written and was being read on LIVE television that wtc7 has collapsed... except wtc7 was still standing.
You are aware that the mass media reported that jets crashed into the ground in Pennsylvania and into the Pentagon? That the mass media has maintained that bold faced Lie for over ten years, even though no jets crashed in Pennsylvania and into the Pentagon?
The ability to float complete and full falsehoods, conceived in advance, and maintained against all evidence for years on end, in the entire mainstream media... that's the real story of 09/11.
When the message is controlled
How did the fires start on floors so far apart on WTC7? We are told that falling debris from the towers did that. But the towers fell in the morning, while the fires at wtc7 were set in the afternoon. FEMA had already evacuated the entire building, now they refused to allow the firemen access. It was common knowledge on the street that they were going to pull the building, so videos with the firemen in the foreground watching it go down, just shrugged; they were waiting for it to happen. Meanwhile, the masters of propaganda were already busy changing the message. All day, all the networks talked about was bombs going off and the probability of demolition.
So the message needed to be changed; now it stressed that this was a natural collapse, caused by fires, set by debris from the towers falling. So, urgent was the need to change the message, that the FOX news already had the analysis in hand, explaining how wtc7 collapsed, and they were reporting it on air, before wtc7 had even gone down. "We are told that this was a structural failure" ... prepared and written in advance, even though wtc7 hasn't even gone down yet.
Watch this clip of the LIVE reporting from 09/11/2001, the anchors already have copy in front of them, so they think they are reporting on an event that just happened. They throw up a LIVE feed of Manhattan, so they assume the smoke from wtc7 fires is the smoke from it's collapse. But when they witness the collapse of the building, they immediately recalculate that what they had actually been watching was the clip of it's earlier collapse. Unwittingly, FOX recorded the collapse with a LIVE feed, they actually had the story before it happened. (Now if they would only give us the results at the horse track the same way.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rHFdcPv3XXI
