Who would benefit most from a President Mittens?

[Bo-4]

Not the average Republican. Profit first.. people second.

Late last week, three different newspapers published three different articles about Mitt Romney’s tenure at Bain Capital. While each article looked at a different portion of Romney’s time at Bain, all three shared a consistent picture of how Mitt Romney’s approach to leadership, one that should remind voters just who will benefit from a Romney presidency. Hint: It won’t be the voters.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...st-presidency/2012/06/25/gJQAlQNn1V_blog.html

 

[Bo-4]

Mitt and the Junk Bond King. REALLY Pugs.. THIS is your guy?

http://articles.boston.com/2012-06-24/business/32395686_1_mitt-romney-drexel-employee-junk-bond

 

[GordonGecko]

It won't even be HIS voters, Bo.

Mitt is "all business"...literally. He'll sell out the Nativists, the Social Cons, and Neo-Cons so fast it'll make their head spin.

Business wants cheap labor?....Mitt will push an "amnesty" plan.

Business wants to avoid social issues that hurt them with gays and moderates?....Mitt will avoid social issues.

Business wants oil cheap, even if Iran gets a nuke?....Mitt will tell Netanyahu to "cool it".

 

[Bo-4]

Yep.. that's exactly correct.

It won't even be HIS voters, Bo.

Mitt is "all business"...literally. He'll sell out the Nativists, the Social Cons, and Neo-Cons so fast it'll make their head spin.

Business wants cheap labor?....Mitt will push an "amnesty" plan.

Business wants to avoid social issues that hurt them with gays and moderates?....Mitt will avoid social issues.

Business wants oil cheap, even if Iran gets a nuke?....Mitt will tell Netanyahu to "cool it".

 

[LeRoy_Was_Here]

Who would benefit most from a President Mittens?

Gosh, that's easy.

Answer: Mitt Rmoney.

 

[Bo-4]

Who would benefit most from a President Mittens?

Gosh, that's easy.

Answer: Mitt Rmoney.

God knows he's not doing it for the 400 grand paycheck (that's not a lot of money ;-)

 

[GordonGecko]

But on the UPside...a lot of Rightwing ideology would be losing.

The Right would be STUCK defending Romney as he sells them out on every non-corporate related issue....and STUCK voting for him again in 2016.

 

[LeRoy_Was_Here]

Nah, it's not for the money. It's for the power, the ego boost, and the immortal fame that comes with being elected President.

Heck, we even remember Millard Fillmore.

 

[UPNYA2]

Not the average Republican. Profit first.. people second.

Late last week, three different newspapers published three different articles about Mitt Romney’s tenure at Bain Capital. While each article looked at a different portion of Romney’s time at Bain, all three shared a consistent picture of how Mitt Romney’s approach to leadership, one that should remind voters just who will benefit from a Romney presidency. Hint: It won’t be the voters.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...st-presidency/2012/06/25/gJQAlQNn1V_blog.html

I see......

So someone voting for a politician based upon something OTHER THAN what he or she offers to give that person is a concept that completely eludes you, huh, bo-bo?

Not surprising.

It is ok, we have the dim party for those who reserve their votes for the people who promise they will see to it they "benefit the most" when they get elected. There should be a party for those who are willing to vote for someone they believe will try to ensure the country as a whole "benefits most".

Odd as I KNOW that must come across to all of you who truely believe you are entitled to as much of other people's monies as you feel will be required for all of you to have as much in life as anyone else.

To be "fair" and all.....

 

[LeRoy_Was_Here]

UPNYA2: There should be a party for those who are willing to vote for someone they believe will try to ensure the country as a whole "benefits most".

LeRoy: There is. I think most of us call it the Democratic Party.

Harry S. Truman: If you want to live like a Republican, vote Democrat.

 

[DefeatObama]

those yet to be transformed

 

[Friday13]

His ill-gotten gains from Bain will continue to flow into his coffers.

 

[NightSwimmer]

But on the UPside...a lot of Rightwing ideology would be losing.

The Right would be STUCK defending Romney as he sells them out on every non-corporate related issue....and STUCK voting for him again in 2016.

How, exactly, would that differ from any other Republican President since Ike? The stupid runs deep with this crowd. They actually think that belief overrules reality -- if only one believes strongly enough. How else could one explain their tendency to do the same thing over and over again, all the while expecting a different outcome? That's why the GOP caters to religious fanatics. They are pre-programmed to toe the party line regardless of the consequences. Fundamentalist religious training is like boot camp for the GOP voter.