New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Why is Eric Holder neglecting his sworn duty?

G

Greenridgeman

Guest
Why does the Justice Department refuse to investigate or seek an indictment agains the criminal Mitt Romney?

Surely this dangerous man should not be allowed to roam free?

Why is Holder refusing to protect America against this criminal?

Any lib want to answer?
 
Bump, bump, bump it up!!!

Why do none of the libs shouting that Romney is a felon want to reply to this post?

Cowards?

Or, sensible enough to know that if this accusing Romney of being a felon continues, it will backfire on Obama?
 
Greenridgeman said:
Why does the Justice Department refuse to investigate or seek an indictment agains the criminal Mitt Romney?

Surely this dangerous man should not be allowed to roam free?

Why is Holder refusing to protect America against this criminal?

Any lib want to answer?
Click to expand...

All in due time. Between being summoned to Issa'a kangaroo court, and combating Republican disenfranchisement attempts, Holder is a busy man.

Besides, investigating Romney right now would be perceived by the elite wingnut brigade as an attempt to influence the election.

We can wait until after the election for the SEC investigation.

Greenridgeman said:
Bump, bump, bump it up!!!

Why do none of the libs shouting that Romney is a felon want to reply to this post?

Cowards?

Or, sensible enough to know that if this accusing Romney of being a felon continues, it will backfire on Obama?
Click to expand...

I don't agree. I think the scrutiny on Romney is very useful in a political sense. Romney sure looks slimy, and I think we'll see more of these questions rather than fewer. There certainly is blood in the water.
 
Court pretty well rejected that disenfranchisement crap, but of course, the court is illegitimate unless it backs Obama.
'
It is amazing how some of your other lib friends, including other moderators, hit and run with the "Romoney' is a felon" crap.

At least you finally addressed the issue, after I bumped up the post.

Now, you want to make a bet, and have Jen or Min hold the cash?

I will bet you $10,000 dollars that if re-elected, Obama and whatever AG he has in his second term, WILL NOT indict Romney.

I suggest we each send a certified bank draft to the moderators, I'll send mine to Min, you send your to Jen, and after 9 months(we know how Obama dithers) if there is no indictment, I cash yours, if there is an indictment, you cash mine.

Put your money where your mouth is.

At least three of these mods can attest to the fact that I DO pay my internet bets.

So, pony up, or shut up.
 
Greenridgeman said:
Court pretty well rejected that disenfranchisement crap, but of course, the court is illegitimate unless it backs Obama.
'
It is amazing how some of your other lib friends, including other moderators, hit and run with the "Romoney' is a felon" crap.

At least you finally addressed the issue, after I bumped up the post.

Now, you want to make a bet, and have Jen or Min hold the cash?

I will bet you $10,000 dollars that if re-elected, Obama and whatever AG he has in his second term, WILL NOT indict Romney.

I suggest we each send a certified bank draft to the moderators, I'll send mine to Min, you send your to Jen, and after 9 months(we know how Obama dithers) if there is no indictment, I cash yours, if there is an indictment, you cash mine.

Put your money where your mouth is.

At least three of these mods can attest to the fact that I DO pay my internet bets.

So, pony up, or shut up.
Click to expand...

Who the hell do you think you are?

[video=youtube;4laRUcuYXmY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4laRUcuYXmY[/video]

Just joking... I have to admit I am intrigued. I think we should discuss your idea further. A few things bother me:

I don't need your money to begin with, and, in the unlikely event I won the bet, if I took $10,000 out of your pocket, I would feel bad. Of course I'd still take the money and immediately donate it to teach you a lesson, but I'd still feel regret. That said, I would be willing to wager a more modest amount, say $100.

Another problem for me is the time scale. I'm going to need more than 9 months for an indictment. Investigations can go on for years. I think three to five years would be more realistic. I might consider odds for a shorter time period in the interests of flexibility. I'm willing to negotiate.

One more thing. I don't think we should involve anyone else. We're both honest men; no need to burden some innocent bystander.

Let me know....
 
BP, you gone nighty night?

I am waiting to see if you want to make the "easy money'.

After your cocksure assertions, shouldn't you take this bet?

I wish ten or twenty of you mouthy libs would take this bet

You beat me by 20 seconds, disregard, I'll catch you in a minute.
 
OK, since all you can afford is $100, I will bet you $100 that the next Obama AG will not even SEEK an indictment in 9 months after the election.

Deal?

I do like the original bet better though.
 
Greenridgeman said:
BP, you gone nighty night?

I am waiting to see if you want to make the "easy money'.

After your cocksure assertions, shouldn't you take this bet?

I wish ten or twenty of you mouthy libs would take this bet

You beat me by 20 seconds, disregard, I'll catch you in a minute.
Click to expand...

[video=youtube;g6GuEswXOXo]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g6GuEswXOXo[/video]
 
Regarding "honest" men, the only one I ever met(at the risk of an infraction for mentioning the unmentionable "other" Hellhole) concerning an internet bet was an old dude named Popeye.

Several moderators can attest that he did pay the $220 he lost to me (payable to a charity).
 
D'oh is right, I was a bit impatient, but given the way certain people here cut and run when confronted, I thought you might have too.

As you can see, I am not very patient.

I do not have YEARS to even live, much less wait for a measly $100 bet.

Nine months is long enough for the AG to seek an indictment, even if a chump-change $100 bet is a bit anemic.

You on?


September 20, 2013, one of us pays up?
 
Greenridgeman said:
OK, since all you can afford is $100...
Click to expand...

I can go up to $200 if it means that much to you. As I said before, were I to win, I'd feel bad taking a bunch of your money since I don't really need it. It just wouldn't sit right with me.

... I will bet you $100 that the next Obama AG will not even SEEK an indictment in 9 months after the election.

Deal?
Click to expand...

Well, I compromised on the amount, $200, and I'd be willing to compromise on the time frame. SEC investigations can go on for some time, years and years. I mentioned 3 to 5 years before, so I'd be willing to cut that down the middle and make the time frame 4 years.

I do like the original bet better though.
Click to expand...

Of course you did. I imagine the typical SEC investigation takes years. It would be a bitter pill to pay-out the month before an indictment came out.

Let me know...
 
Far cry from the assertions that "Romney IS a felon".

Now it is, let's take YEARS and investigate to see IF he is a felon.

Let's make a new bet.

$10,000 dollars the SEC DOES NOT launch an investigation into Mitt Romney in the first 9 months of the next Presidential term.

I really have no interest in a chump-change bet.

Same deal, certified check made out to you and I , and the respective mods.

Two signatures required to cash the checks.

Judy 1 could handle the checks if you like, she handled the other bet.

You were so adamant that he IS a felon earlier, what caused the second thoughts?
 
Greenridgeman said:
Regarding "honest" men, the only one I ever met(at the risk of an infraction for mentioning the unmentionable "other" Hellhole) concerning an internet bet was an old dude named Popeye.

Several moderators can attest that he did pay the $220 he lost to me (payable to a charity).
Click to expand...

I won a couple bets on one site that no one here ever heard of. One guy paid out to charity, it was about the nuclear exclusion zone in Japan, and I went ahead and matched it.

The other guy pretended the whole bet never happened, so I just let it go.

I bet a liberal once on yet another site that no one hear ever heard of, but I contrived to lose the bet anyway, and the winner was to donate $100 to the DNC.
 
And that dodges the question of the bet.

Look dude, I doubt I have time to LIVE to wait YEARS for an indictment, and I don't bet chump change.
 
It is after midnight, my GF calls about 6:15 am, I do not have all night to wait.

I'm out of here, withdraw bet soon.
 
You might get what your asking for....looks like Nitt Witt Mitt lied on his FEC papers last month saying he had NOTHING...NOTHING to do with Bain after 99 and the SEC filings say he did...

The trickle is getting louder..

Thx
 
Greenridgeman said:
Far cry from the assertions that "Romney IS a felon".

Now it is, let's take YEARS and investigate to see IF he is a felon.

Let's make a new bet.

$10,000 dollars the SEC DOES NOT launch an investigation into Mitt Romney in the first 9 months of the next Presidential term.

I really have no interest in a chump-change bet.

Same deal, certified check made out to you and I , and the respective mods.

Two signatures required to cash the checks.

Judy 1 could handle the checks if you like, she handled the other bet.

You were so adamant that he IS a felon earlier, what caused the second thoughts?
Click to expand...

I assure you that any second thoughts exist purely in your imagination.

What if after the election the SEC came and asked Romney, "What's this about your 2003 filing, where you or weren't you Bain CEO?"

And Romney replied, " At that time I was most certainly CEO at Bain," and so the SEC terminated its investigation; I would get the 10 grand, correct?

What if that happened before the election?

And I find your 9 month window curious; why the 9 months? I'm definitely going to need more time. The SEC might investigate Romney without telling anyone, drop the investigation, and then we find out years later. Of course, were that to happen, I would want my money back and yours by way of compensation.

Also, I already said why I don't want to take $10,000 from you, and that I don't want to burden people who just happened to be standing around minding their own business. Did you already forget all that?
 
Nice dodge, BD.

You know I am not too patient.

I realize that like all libs you run when cornered, but you were SO ADAMANT Romney was a felon just an hour ago, I thought you would take the bet.

Apparently you can't/won't risk a worthy sum for betting, so, goodnight.

I feel the time allowed was sufficient, considering the OBVIOUS felonious offense of Mitt Romney.

Goodnight! Bets are off until I sleep some.
 
D'oh, beat me by seconds again.

Well if that scenario happened, he wouldn't be a felon, would he.

That was what you were saying.

I crafted the bet carefully, didn't even demand he be convicted, just charged by the AG.

The Obama campaign has said he is a felon, so I did not think an investigation would be needed, the proof has to be there.

If the indictment had happened BEFORE the election, I would have paid.

And in nine months you can make a baby, surely in nine months you could indict a man already convicted by the Obama campaign.

If we find out years later, well, so what, that is not the terms of the bet. If being your operative word, what "if" we find out years later that Obama really was born in Kenya? Same thing, it would be too late.

As for burdening other people, I did offer Judy 1, who brokered a bet once before.

Hell, we could have OBAMA hold the cash.

Thing is, you simply could not put up, to back up, what you tossed up, about Romney.

And called to put your money where your mouth is, you can't/won't.

I hope you learn to be more careful in what you say.

Especially calling people liars.

Be very, very specific and give proof.

You and the other loudmouths are being watched, watched CLOSELY.

So if you say, for example that I lie if I say I am Hispanic, make sure you have done the geneology work, because I will have.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top