New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

WTF is a "Perjury Trap"

geez.gif
geez.gif
geez.gif

Oh Lordy.
 
Nobody can be "trapped" into lying under oath. There is no such thing as a perjury trap. Why is it so hard for Trump to tell the truth?

Actually there is, lawyer speak inside baseball stuff but you can be tossed into a perjury trap.

Essentially boils down to this, you as a person giving testimony tell the truth ......however in that situation you are actually not the one who gets to decide that.

Prosecutors use this to trip people up all the time, get them to say something they know is in accurate and then..........ya got them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
still trying to figure out what that even means.
Mental midgette huh? No surprise there.........

A perjury trap is a form of prosecutorial misconduct in which a prosecutor calls a witness to testify, typically before a grand jury, with the intent of coercing the witness into perjury (intentional deceit under oath). Most often a perjury trap is employed because the prosecutor is unable to prosecute the defendant on other charges.
 
Mental midgette huh? No surprise there.........

A perjury trap is a form of prosecutorial misconduct in which a prosecutor calls a witness to testify, typically before a grand jury, with the intent of coercing the witness into perjury (intentional deceit under oath). Most often a perjury trap is employed because the prosecutor is unable to prosecute the defendant on other charges.
How is one "trapped" into lying?
 
Concoct a scenario, you think is a "Perjury trap". I need an example here.

Essentially boils down to this, you as a person giving testimony tell the truth ......however in that situation you are actually not the one who gets to decide that.

Prosecutors use this to trip people up all the time, get them to say something they know is inaccurate and then..........ya got them.
 
Essentially boils down to this, you as a person giving testimony tell the truth ......however in that situation you are actually not the one who gets to decide that.
The truth is the truth. There are not multiple versions of it. No one decides what the truth is. It is an absolute.
Prosecutors use this to trip people up all the time, get them to say something they know is inaccurate and then..........ya got them.
What stops them from telling the truth?
 
Essentially boils down to this, you as a person giving testimony tell the truth ......however in that situation you are actually not the one who gets to decide that.

Prosecutors use this to trip people up all the time, get them to say something they know is inaccurate and then..........ya got them.
He said, she said is a classic perjury trap.

Scenario.......

Trump asserts he had a bologna sandwich for lunch. Obama asserts that it was turkey. The investigator has two different responses and is now free to assume one of you is lying. The investigator then decides Trump is lying and charges him based on nothing but a difference of opinion. Trap slams shut.

Classic perujury trap. All it takes it two people with two different recollections of an incident.
 
He was not trapped into committing perjury. He did that by choice.
Bullshit.

The azzhole lied. He knew he was lying when he did it. That much you are correct about.

However........he never thought for a minute she had the dress with his willie juice on it. He thought he was home free. But the prosecution had the dress and KNEW his spunk was on it.

The prosecution gave Slick the chance to tell the truth and he failed. Trap slams shut.
 
It's when an investigator tries to trick you into telling the truth in two different ways, so they can call it a lie and prosecute you for it.
 
Back
Top