New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Yeap, let's have another one of those 'O' STIMULUS

Better than wasting a trillion dollars on that Bull$hit Invasion of Iraq...That worked out sooooooooooooo Well
 
BA, run on out and get ya one them Mihelle garden books, if ya plan on eating in the near future.........
 
Damn 1 Trillion wasted on Iraq and 4,000 Dead US Military....After that the stimulus doesn't look so bad.....Iraq...That was a real fvckin fiasco...LOL
 
Saladin2 said:
Damn 1 Trillion wasted on Iraq and 4,000 Dead US Military....After that the stimulus doesn't look so bad.....Iraq...That was a real fvckin fiasco...LOL
Click to expand...

one has what to do with the other.

we piss away 1.5 trillion a year here. what do the D's have to show for it?

at least we have another democratic ally in the mid east...

what was the death toll in WWII (that's world war two. you can google it)
 
Iraq has not one damn dime to do with the 'O' stimulus and or his crony loans..............dem/libs voted FOR[/ BOTHB]

got a problem with that write ya dem/lib politicians
 
Dawg said:
BA, run on out and get ya one them Mihelle garden books, if ya plan on eating in the near future.........
Click to expand...

Better to get yourself a farm, because this "Do Whatever It Takes," it going to take you longer than you originally planned.

Maybe you can explain to us, why Bush who had 6 years of charge over the three Republican branches of government, didn't fix the economy that you say Clinton wrecked over 8 years, while you practiced "Do Whatever It Takes" politics in DC??
 
Bush fixed Clintons RECESSION quite quickly even with tall building falling in NYC.........

I got the farm

I will eat while many libs stomachs will be rubbing their backbones (wait, few libs have backbones) when theirs are empty!

'O' libs can only type BUSH, BUSH, BUSH................reverse your question and ask why couldn't 'O' corrected the economy with all three houses?
 
post link proving there's not 8 MILLION fewer full-time workers since 2007________________________

waiting....
 
Dawg said:
post link proving there's not 8 MILLION fewer full-time workers since 2007________________________

waiting....
Click to expand...

Here smarty pants is your link


NOTICE the highest number for 2007 is 137893 (thousands)

While right now it is 133009 (thousands)

That is a difference of 4884 (thousands) NOT 8000 (thousands)
 
"smarty pants" how old are you 10?

1-12......................well it's now 6-12..................get back to us when you have a current link
 
Reality

Inner city warfare cost many more lives than the Iraq War. Statistically one was safer in Iraq than in Chicago, or on an American interstate.

The entire face of the Middle East is changing as dictator are deposed.

It started with George W. Bush kicking Saddam Hussein's ass.
 
Dawg said:
"smarty pants" how old are you 10?

1-12......................well it's now 6-12..................get back to us when you have a current link
Click to expand...

Maybe you should ask a 10 yr old to show you how to read the link I sent you.

It includes the preliminary number that was released TODAY

An any more current link would require time travel to the future.
 
link was worthless

today is 6-1-2012 and why does full-time workers allude you, btw, you think NO farm workers have been laid off...........
 
Dawg said:
link was worthless

today is 6-1-2012 and why does full-time workers allude you, btw, you think NO farm workers have been laid off...........
Click to expand...


Yes today is the first day of June. The numbers represent the numbers for the month of May. That is because there is not full month of June to report. That is very likely because we haven't even finish the first day yet.

Now if you would like me to link you to a glossary of the terms used by the BLS to describe employment and how it is calculated all you have to do is ask nicely.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top