Mytzlplk
Governor
but then, that naturally follows given the many and varied efforts of the dementedly dishonest and/or criminallly stupid.
Perhaps maybe some of you can help me out, because I'm having a tough time thinking of some issue where all those descriptions were more in evidence, and shamelessly so.
And of course their treasonous conduct (well, in a CONnotative sense anyway) has all kinds of support. For example http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/24/w...-blow-to-cia-efforts.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 while their baseless defaming has none at all http://t.news.msn.com/us/us-officials-counter-reports-on-benghazi-attacks
all of which of course makes one wonder if they should be held to account http://www.laprogressive.com/right-wing-sedition/#sthash.87FiX5vC.dpuf
And quite frankly, I'd say that should Mutt be elected, and decide to follow the advice of his neo-cons (war criminals) advice on Iran, they'd likely be more than happy to prosecute in any way possible us anti-war people for the dissent -- no matter how truthful it will be as it was with Bush -- with more than just the "you hate the troops/love the terrorists" BS that figured so prominently then, if they can.
After all, what is there to stop them? The cons that spewed that BS daily back in the day are respected and liked, much as those that have been charging dems with supporting a guy who let those in Libya die as sacrificial lambs for political gain are. A lack of individual accountability is all but completely lacking for rightwingnut kooks, whether we're talking about their leaders or the minions that fully support their complete abandonment of the 9th Commandment, and worse. Why? Well, because they all satisfy the minimal amount of societal expectations like loving their family and friends, and little puppy dogs and kittens too -- just like the Nazis no doubt did -- which therefore makes them "just like us", just in "reasonable" disagreement over trifling issues like global warming, social justice, etc, you know, things that kill people or that involve needless and totally avoidable human misery.
The "truth" hasn't been the only victim of the rightwingnut decades long campaign to destroy the concept of "agreed upon facts", the personal insult value of their dishonest efforts is all but nonexistent as well. Those that spew the "BHO's an infanticidal marxist muslim born in Kenya who's the terrorists best friend that let those in Libya die for political gain (and cover for the fact he's in cahoots with them) are just engaging in "politics as usual", unlike their Nazi cousins when they used similar tactics to "otherize" jews, gays, gypsies, etc, and subsequently sent their brownshirts into the streets to beat them and union members up.
Whether most people openly acknowledge this in detail or not is irrelevant, but that they'll act upon it is relevant. The fear of the ever-escalating rightwingnuttery in word and deed is why I've long thought BHO's reelection never in doubt. And the point here is that if you think that the last four years have shown what your "friends" of the rightwing persuasion are really all about, well, I'd posit you haven't seen anything yet. If they haven't managed to slap off both cheeks yet with their endless cheek-slapping, maybe they'll "get 'er done" in the next four years by identifying you as supporting worse things than just a guy who "let those people die".
"c" y'all
Perhaps maybe some of you can help me out, because I'm having a tough time thinking of some issue where all those descriptions were more in evidence, and shamelessly so.
Fox's Own Experts Reject Fox Narrative That Obama Deliberately Abandoned Americans In Libya
Blog ››› November 2, 2012 4:35 PM EDT ››› TERRY KREPEL
79
Fox News' argument that the Obama administration deliberately abandoned Americans in Libya to let them die in the Benghazi terrorist attack is apparently so odious that even Fox's own experts and commentators are rebelling against the narrative.
Fox News hosts and contributors have repeatedly suggested that the Obama administration made a "political decision" to allow Americans to be killed in the September 11 Benghazi, Libya, attack on an American compound, even though U.S. agents and the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli rushed to aid the compound during the attack, and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has said that the attack was over before the U.S. military had sufficient information on which to act. http://mediamatters.org/blog/2012/11/02/foxs-own-experts-reject-fox-narrative-that-obam/191104
Blog ››› November 2, 2012 4:35 PM EDT ››› TERRY KREPEL
79
Fox News' argument that the Obama administration deliberately abandoned Americans in Libya to let them die in the Benghazi terrorist attack is apparently so odious that even Fox's own experts and commentators are rebelling against the narrative.
Fox News hosts and contributors have repeatedly suggested that the Obama administration made a "political decision" to allow Americans to be killed in the September 11 Benghazi, Libya, attack on an American compound, even though U.S. agents and the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli rushed to aid the compound during the attack, and Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has said that the attack was over before the U.S. military had sufficient information on which to act. http://mediamatters.org/blog/2012/11/02/foxs-own-experts-reject-fox-narrative-that-obam/191104
And of course their treasonous conduct (well, in a CONnotative sense anyway) has all kinds of support. For example http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/24/w...-blow-to-cia-efforts.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 while their baseless defaming has none at all http://t.news.msn.com/us/us-officials-counter-reports-on-benghazi-attacks
all of which of course makes one wonder if they should be held to account http://www.laprogressive.com/right-wing-sedition/#sthash.87FiX5vC.dpuf
And quite frankly, I'd say that should Mutt be elected, and decide to follow the advice of his neo-cons (war criminals) advice on Iran, they'd likely be more than happy to prosecute in any way possible us anti-war people for the dissent -- no matter how truthful it will be as it was with Bush -- with more than just the "you hate the troops/love the terrorists" BS that figured so prominently then, if they can.
After all, what is there to stop them? The cons that spewed that BS daily back in the day are respected and liked, much as those that have been charging dems with supporting a guy who let those in Libya die as sacrificial lambs for political gain are. A lack of individual accountability is all but completely lacking for rightwingnut kooks, whether we're talking about their leaders or the minions that fully support their complete abandonment of the 9th Commandment, and worse. Why? Well, because they all satisfy the minimal amount of societal expectations like loving their family and friends, and little puppy dogs and kittens too -- just like the Nazis no doubt did -- which therefore makes them "just like us", just in "reasonable" disagreement over trifling issues like global warming, social justice, etc, you know, things that kill people or that involve needless and totally avoidable human misery.
The "truth" hasn't been the only victim of the rightwingnut decades long campaign to destroy the concept of "agreed upon facts", the personal insult value of their dishonest efforts is all but nonexistent as well. Those that spew the "BHO's an infanticidal marxist muslim born in Kenya who's the terrorists best friend that let those in Libya die for political gain (and cover for the fact he's in cahoots with them) are just engaging in "politics as usual", unlike their Nazi cousins when they used similar tactics to "otherize" jews, gays, gypsies, etc, and subsequently sent their brownshirts into the streets to beat them and union members up.
Whether most people openly acknowledge this in detail or not is irrelevant, but that they'll act upon it is relevant. The fear of the ever-escalating rightwingnuttery in word and deed is why I've long thought BHO's reelection never in doubt. And the point here is that if you think that the last four years have shown what your "friends" of the rightwing persuasion are really all about, well, I'd posit you haven't seen anything yet. If they haven't managed to slap off both cheeks yet with their endless cheek-slapping, maybe they'll "get 'er done" in the next four years by identifying you as supporting worse things than just a guy who "let those people die".
"c" y'all
