P
PACE
Guest
So the President's performance was less than stellar the other night, and sometimes it's best to review and think about something before commenting on it.
You know who lost? Romney, here's why, he was prepared and ready to debate, no doubt, in fact, he was also frenetic in his body language, aggression, etc., you know "soft skills" but CEO's don't have soft skills, arrogance, and brazen demeanor are rewarded in the board room.
BUT, here's what Obama didn't do, he didn't give Romney an opportunity to state he was "completely wrong" about the 47%; that would have meant 58 million people would have seen live Romney apologize for his remark, I mean if there is another intepretation of saying one is "wrong", if there is a possibility that this is not construed as a form of apology, please find it and post it.
You see, Romney was "forced" to go on the only show that would allow him to fart in public and call it "amazing perspective", that would be Sean Hannity's show, he won't go on Limbaugh or even call in, I mean, really, even Romney has a stop gap on batshitcrazy.
But he had to go on Sean's show and offer his apology to those "who really, really believe" that 47% of this country is on crack, welfare, Cheetzos and pop soda, watching Springer, and Maury all day long.
Yep, Romney had to tell those who "clap their hands, and chant I Believe! I Believe"
That this was not true, he was wrong, WRONG.
So what does that mean? it means the moderates didn't hear him directly, the democrats didn't hear him directly, the sane fiscal conservatives, all four of them, didn't hear him directly.
Only the conspiracy theorists heard him, the birther, rich worshipping, paul revere wannabes, heard him.
So the philophical question remains, "if a Romney says he was wrong, and those that previously believed he was wrong don't hear him, do the polls change?"
Brilliant, nicely done
Regards
Pace
You know who lost? Romney, here's why, he was prepared and ready to debate, no doubt, in fact, he was also frenetic in his body language, aggression, etc., you know "soft skills" but CEO's don't have soft skills, arrogance, and brazen demeanor are rewarded in the board room.
BUT, here's what Obama didn't do, he didn't give Romney an opportunity to state he was "completely wrong" about the 47%; that would have meant 58 million people would have seen live Romney apologize for his remark, I mean if there is another intepretation of saying one is "wrong", if there is a possibility that this is not construed as a form of apology, please find it and post it.
You see, Romney was "forced" to go on the only show that would allow him to fart in public and call it "amazing perspective", that would be Sean Hannity's show, he won't go on Limbaugh or even call in, I mean, really, even Romney has a stop gap on batshitcrazy.
But he had to go on Sean's show and offer his apology to those "who really, really believe" that 47% of this country is on crack, welfare, Cheetzos and pop soda, watching Springer, and Maury all day long.
Yep, Romney had to tell those who "clap their hands, and chant I Believe! I Believe"
That this was not true, he was wrong, WRONG.
So what does that mean? it means the moderates didn't hear him directly, the democrats didn't hear him directly, the sane fiscal conservatives, all four of them, didn't hear him directly.
Only the conspiracy theorists heard him, the birther, rich worshipping, paul revere wannabes, heard him.
So the philophical question remains, "if a Romney says he was wrong, and those that previously believed he was wrong don't hear him, do the polls change?"
Brilliant, nicely done
Regards
Pace
