I'm crying, please get a camera. Oh and by the way no aid for you

[ObamacareForever]

Is there a point? do these individuals deserve the relief that everyone seemingly agrees that they need? if so, fund it. no?

They were just as appalled at the conditions and then voted no. Yet no mention of them in the top post?

 

[PhilFish]

They were just as appalled at the conditions and then voted no. Yet no mention of them in the top post?

ah, it is a requisite to cite everyone in a top post?

 

[ObamacareForever]

ah, it is a requisite to cite everyone in a top post?

If you want to be fair.

 

[PhilFish]

If you want to be fair.

interesting. I'll remember that..

 

[reason10]

They voted against because it because they can't trust the money would be used to alleviate the conditions.

They voted against it because they have no other issues to run on in 2020. Obama created those camps. He's the one who first started separating the children from those animals. But because President Trump wants that money for the children, suddenly they aren't worthy.

By the way, the wall IS getting built. Slowly. And once that wall is built, there will be no more animals trying to cross the border. There will be no more separating children from those drug dealing human trafficking animals who dragged them across jungles in two Central American countries.

But you prefer seeing children in detention camps, huh?

 

[ObamacareForever]

They voted against it because they have no other issues to run on in 2020. Obama created those camps. He's the one who first started separating the children from those animals. But because President Trump wants that money for the children, suddenly they aren't worthy.

By the way, the wall IS getting built. Slowly. And once that wall is built, there will be no more animals trying to cross the border. There will be no more separating children from those drug dealing human trafficking animals who dragged them across jungles in two Central American countries.

But you prefer seeing children in detention camps, huh?

Good thing Democrats in the house passed the funding.

 

[llovejim]

I dont follow? thread jack?


At issue is persons openly railing against conditions and provisions....but then voting against the very funding that would improve and alleviate same.

How does that comport?

they voted against it because they said the money would be diverted to ICE once it was given. I agree, that is a dumbass, silly reason - to turn down the possible to try and attain the impossible. the 192 repubs voted against it because they could give a shit if brown people are treated humanely or not.

but you reserve your hostility and your fake outrage for the democrats....how sad.

Four House Democrats on Tuesday evening bucked party leadership and voted against a bill to provide $4.5 billion in emergency border funding.

The Democrats who voted against the bill were Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.), Ilhan Omar (Minn.), Ayanna Pressley(Mass.) and Rashida Tlaib (Mich.)

The handful of defections come in the wake of Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) meeting on Monday evening with progressive and Latino lawmakers who were hesitant to support the measure.

The Speaker urged members of her party to support the legislation earlier in the day, arguing that defecting would be a win for President Trump.

“Understand what we’re up against in the White House. The president would love for this bill to go down today,” Pelosi said during a closed-door caucus meeting Tuesday, according to a senior Democratic aide.

“A vote against this bill is a vote for Donald Trump and his inhumane, outside-the-circle of civilized attitude toward the children."

In a statement, Omar explained her reason for voting no.

“Throwing more money at the very organizations committing human rights abuses—and the very Administration directing these human rights abuses—is not a solution," she said. "This is a humanitarian crisis—a humanitarian crisis inflicted by our own leadership. It's also a refugee crisis fueled by state violence, corruption, and impunity in the Northern Triangle--one that this Administration has only fueled through mass deportation and slashing aid."

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/450363-the-4-house-democrats-who-voted-against-the-border-funding-bill

 

[reason10]

Good thing Democrats in the house passed the funding.

The wall would have been a better idea. Fewer animals crossing. Fewer animals trying to cross.

To bring you up to speed with what has happened, these animals were not Americans arrested and imprisoned without a trial.

These animals ILLEGALLY crossed the border. So far, TWO presidents have locked them up until their hearing.

They would have been better off staying in their shithole countries.

 

[PhilFish]

they voted against it because they said the money would be diverted to ICE once it was given. I agree, that is a dumbass, silly reason - to turn down the possible to try and attain the impossible. the 192 repubs voted against it because they could give a shit if brown people are treated humanely or not.

but you reserve your hostility and your fake outrage for the democrats....how sad.

Four House Democrats on Tuesday evening bucked party leadership and voted against a bill to provide $4.5 billion in emergency border funding.

The Democrats who voted against the bill were Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.), Ilhan Omar (Minn.), Ayanna Pressley(Mass.) and Rashida Tlaib (Mich.)

The handful of defections come in the wake of Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) meeting on Monday evening with progressive and Latino lawmakers who were hesitant to support the measure.

The Speaker urged members of her party to support the legislation earlier in the day, arguing that defecting would be a win for President Trump.

“Understand what we’re up against in the White House. The president would love for this bill to go down today,” Pelosi said during a closed-door caucus meeting Tuesday, according to a senior Democratic aide.

“A vote against this bill is a vote for Donald Trump and his inhumane, outside-the-circle of civilized attitude toward the children."

In a statement, Omar explained her reason for voting no.

“Throwing more money at the very organizations committing human rights abuses—and the very Administration directing these human rights abuses—is not a solution," she said. "This is a humanitarian crisis—a humanitarian crisis inflicted by our own leadership. It's also a refugee crisis fueled by state violence, corruption, and impunity in the Northern Triangle--one that this Administration has only fueled through mass deportation and slashing aid."

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/450363-the-4-house-democrats-who-voted-against-the-border-funding-bill

how do you solve the humanitarian crisis. they need aid? or they do not need aid?

 

[ObamacareForever]

how do you solve the humanitarian crisis. they need aid? or they do not need aid?

They got aid from the house. Will the Senate pass it?

 

[PhilFish]

They got aid from the house. Will the Senate pass it?

they need aid. got it.

 

[ObamacareForever]

they need aid. got it.

What's the hold up?

 

[llovejim]

QUOTE="reason10, post: 2480636, member: 24654"]They voted against it because they have no other issues to run on in 2020. Obama created those camps. He's the one who first started separating the children from those animals. But because President Trump wants that money for the children, suddenly they aren't worthy.

By the way, the wall IS getting built. Slowly. And once that wall is built, there will be no more animals trying to cross the border. There will be no more separating children from those drug dealing human trafficking animals who dragged them across jungles in two Central American countries.

But you prefer seeing children in detention camps, huh?

[/QUOTE]
you are a goddamn liar. what a chickenshit way to go through life- lying like you were trump or something...here are the facts, liar. choke on it...

Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Monday announced that the Department of Justice (DOJ) has enacted its previously announced “zero tolerance” policy for individuals who cross the southern border illegally, warning that children who are apprehended may be separated from their family.

Donald Trump, again, falsely says Obama had family separation policy ...

https://www.politifact.com/...trump/donald-trump-again-falsely-says-obama-had-famil...
Claim: "When I became president, President Obama had a separation policy. I didn’t have it. He had it."
Claimed by: Donald Trump
Fact check by PolitiFact: False

Trump again falsely says Obama started family separation policy

https://www.usatoday.com/story/.../trump...says-obama-started...separation/1540733001/
Jun 23, 2019 - Trump said Obama initiated the policy of separating those children from their caregivers, even though fact checkers have found that claim to be ...

Trump is trying to rewrite the history of his family separation policy - Vox

https://www.vox.com/2019/6/.../trump-family-separation-policy-obama-time-telemun...
Jun 21, 2019 - In two new interviews, Trump tries to pin blame on Obama. He has nobody to blame but himself.
Trump Falsely Claims Obama Began Migrant Family Separations | Time

https://time.com › Politics › White House
Jun 23, 2019 - President Trump dismissed the plight of children in detention centers and claimed that Obama enacted the migrant family separation policy.
Trump on Telemundo falsely blames Obama for family separation policy

https://www.washingtonpost.com/.../trump-telemundo-family-separation-policy-obama/
Jun 21, 2019 - The president's comments come just days after he vowed to start mass ... Trump, questioned on child separation policy, insists, 'I brought the ...

 

[reason10]

how do you solve the humanitarian crisis. they need aid? or they do not need aid?

First, get the Nazis out of Congress. They created the problem by telling those animals that bringing a child would get them citizenship.

Second. Finish the wall. Put a nice big beautiful DOOR on that wall and invite the world. Tell the animals to get in line like everyone else.

If someone tried to break in front of a liberal in a Starbucks, there would be pants wetting and an attempted fistfight. These same liberals don't seem to have a problem with animals doing it to our southern border.

 

[llovejim]

The wall would have been a better idea. Fewer animals crossing. Fewer animals trying to cross.

To bring you up to speed with what has happened, these animals were not Americans arrested and imprisoned without a trial.

These animals ILLEGALLY crossed the border. So far, TWO presidents have locked them up until their hearing.

They would have been better off staying in their shithole countries.

why do you consider them animals? are you just trying to prove how totally out of your mind you are to spew crazy ass shit like that? if so, good job. even most trump voters are way to the left of you on this hateful rhetoric.

 

[NinaS]

They voted against because it because they can't trust the money would be used to alleviate the conditions.

I bet there was stipulations in the bill that gave part of the money to the stupid wall or hell, even to the Trump 2020 campaign. Or even for another parade in his honor.

 

[NinaS]

They were just as appalled at the conditions and then voted no. Yet no mention of them in the top post?

LOL Good catch. Why mention republicans...it's always :LEFTY's fault.

 

[reason10]

I bet there was stipulations in the bill that gave part of the money to the stupid wall or hell, even to the Trump 2020 campaign. Or even for another parade in his honor.

The lies just keep coming, don't they?

Like you REALLY believe the House of Representatives would pass such a bill.

And you wonder why everybody says liberals are so STUPID.

(Folks. Name the movie this is from.)

 

[llovejim]

how do you solve the humanitarian crisis. they need aid? or they do not need aid?

i said they were silly and wrong...cutting off their nose to spite their face. all of these women have said things I find totally senseless and off the wall, but not out of racist or bigoted intent, just because they are passionate and inclined to speak first and see if what they said makes any sense later. but what possible reason could 192 repubs have for not wanting to ease the humanitarian crisis and why is that somehow less egregious than 4 democrats out of the whole House voting against it?

 

[Dawg]

Four House Democrats on Tuesday evening bucked party leadership and voted against a bill to provide $4.5 billion in emergency border funding.

The Democrats who voted against the bill were Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.), Ilhan Omar (Minn.), Ayanna Pressley (Mass.) and Rashida Tlaib (Mich.)


Racists !

The Mo's of Babble On