New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Time to Impeach and then also prosecute....

justoffal

Senator
This is astonishing.

http://wakeup-world.com/2012/05/05/landmark-lawsuit-by-us-home-owners-implicates-obama-and-big-banks-in-massive-global-laundering-scheme/

A new lawsuit, which is bordering on the unbelievable, implicates the Obama administration and some of the world’s largest banks in the largest international money laundering case in history.

This global money laundering network was allegedly formed during the Obama administration and helped banks rob U.S. home owners through offshore affiliates in infamous tax havens and money laundering hubs like the Cayman Island, Isle of Man, Luxembourg and Malaysia.

A press release published by Marketwatch (a website owned by the Wall Street Journal) via Marketwire on April 23, 2012, by America’s Spire Law Group, revealed that a mass tort action on behalf of home owners across the United States has been filed in the Supreme Court of New York, County of Kings.


The release states that the suit implicates every major bank servicer and their subsidiaries, as well as the Obama administration which allegedly was privately ratifying the formation of shell corporations in violation of not only the USA PATRIOT Act, but also State and Federal law as well.

This is all while the administration was very publicly encouraging home owners to modify their loans.

The suit, which has been assigned Index No. 500827 and was filed by the Spire Law Group and their affiliates and partners throughout the United States, also alleges that Bank of America, J.P. Morgan, Wells Fargo Bank, Citibank, Citigroup, One West Bank, among other federally chartered banks stole hundreds of millions of dollars from U.S. home owners through little-known offshore companies.

The money was then laundered through offshore corporations, and surprisingly the suit is quite explicit in identifying specific companies as well as the countries they are located in which were used to help defraud huge sums of money from Americans.

These activities are violations of the guidelines of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), New York state law, not to mention other states as well as federal law.

Columbus, Ohio-based trial lawyer and author Eric J. Wittenberg made some quite heated statements on behalf of the plaintiffs in the case.

“The laundering of trillions of dollars of U.S. taxpayer money — and the wrongful taking of the homes of those taxpayers — was known by the Administration and expressly supported by it. Evidence uncovered by the plaintiffs revealed that the Administration ignored its own agencies’ reports — and reports from the Department of Homeland Security — about this situation, dating as far back as 2010,” Wittenberg said.

“Worse, the Administration purported to endorse a ‘national bank settlement’ without disclosing or having any public discourse whatsoever about the thousands of foreign tax havens now wholly owned by our nation’s banks. Fortunately, no home owner is bound to enter into this fraudulent bank settlement,” he added.

The many home owners involved in the case are suing these major financial institutions and their foreign allies not only for fraud and larceny but also for conversion and violations of provisions of New York state law and other laws.

If this lawsuit is what they are making it out to be, there could be a great deal of incredibly important information brought to light.

The press release states, “

This lawsuit explains why loans were, in general, rarely modified after 2009. It explains why the entire bank crisis worsened, crippling the economy of the United States and stripping countless home owners of their piece of the American dream. It is indeed a fact that the Administration has spent far more money stopping bank investigations, than they have investigating them. When the Administration’s agencies (like the FDIC) blew the whistle, their reports were ignored.”

“As if it is not bad enough that banks collect money and do not credit it to homeowners’ accounts, and as if it is not bad enough that those banks then foreclose when they know they do not have a legally enforceable interest in the realty, we now learn that they have been operating under unbridled free reign given by the Administration and some states’ Attorneys General in formulating this international money laundering network,” Wittenberg said.

“Now that the light of day has been shined on it, I believe we can all rest assured that the beginning of the end of the bank crisis has arrived,” he added.

All I can say is I hope he is right. This is truly one of the most astounding cases which has come to light in recent history, to say the least.

If this case is successful it could very well mean a major blow to the entire corrupt global financial system.

About the Author

Madison Ruppert is the Editor and Owner-Operator of the alternative news and analysis database End The Lie and has no affiliation with any NGO, political party, economic school, or other organization/cause. He is available for podcast and radio interviews. If you have questions, comments, or corrections feel free to contact him at admin@EndtheLie.com
 

ARMCX1

Mayor
The lawsuit is an accusation of predatory lending practices covering the period 2003-2007; the bundling of the mortgages into mortgage backed securities into fraudulent investment securities; and an accusation that the defendants (banks and private mortgage originators) defrauded the plaintiffs; and caused the financial crisis beginning in 2008.

Nowhere in the suit, is there an accusation that:

"...As if it is not bad enough that banks collect money and do not credit it to homeowners’ accounts, and as if it is not bad enough that those banks then foreclose when they know they do not have a legally enforceable interest in the realty, we now learn that they have been operating under unbridled free reign given by the Administration and some states’ Attorneys General in formulating this international money laundering network,..." quoted by Eric J. Wittenberg, Esq. (not an attorney of record in the lawsuit)

Perhaps you can point out the relevant sections in the lawsuit that supports your top post. Below is a link to an e-copy of the lawsuit.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/91540154/Lawsuit

I'm not expecting you to find the relevant section--because they don't exist--or to even respond.

You've been called out again for BS.
 

justoffal

Senator
Hmmm.... I going to have to admit to being bested on that one. You are absolutely right and I stand corrected. I hope like hell that the accusations are not even ten percent true....I don't want them to be true.
 

justoffal

Senator
No...I don't think so.

If the Administration knowingly ( and it looks like they did know ) settled with the banks to streamline the foreclosure process they have become inexorably complicit in the entire crime from start to finish. This is not a difficult concept but then there are those that need proof of a shoe lace bow and peer reviewed papers on whether or not it's actually tied. So my suggestion to you is to buy the velcro sneakers.

Also please link to me any time that you have called me out on Bullshit...

because I call bullshit on that.

JO
 

justoffal

Senator
Psssssssst

Hey buddy....did you know that Mitt Romney has ....um......get ready for now...I know this is going to be hard on you and may cause shock and dismay but listen......it's a...

it's a......




SWISS BANK ACCOUNT!

Yes it is...a swiss bank account! Oooooooooooooooooooh.

Can you say Solyndra boys and girls? Can you say Fiskar?
 

ARMCX1

Mayor
If the Administration knowingly ( and it looks like they did know ) settled with the banks to streamline the foreclosure process they have become inexorably complicit in the entire crime from start to finish. This is not a difficult concept but then there are those that need proof of a shoe lace bow and peer reviewed papers on whether or not it's actually tied. So my suggestion to you is to buy the velcro sneakers.
The lawsuit doesn't name the administration as a defendant. It names private mortgage originators and Wall Street banks. You've relied upon the gaseous bloviations of the rightwing blogosphere and opinion pieces. Again, where in the suit is there mention of the Obama administration? There isn't any.

Also please link to me any time that you have called me out on Bullshit...
well when you posted photos of trayvon martin that turned out to be photos of someone else
 

justoffal

Senator
I don't need to rely on anything but my own two eyes. Here is your complicity

I did not infer that the lawsuit named the white house....what I inferred in the top post was that if the administration was willing to facilitate the foreclosure process by rubber stamping a general settlement with the five banks that ponied up 25B....a mere pittance for them btw.....so that they could ignore legal challenges to their illegitimate process...then they ( the white house, the administration in general ) deserve to be impeached and then prosecuted as accessories. If the law suit uncovers the systematic funneling of mortgage funds in to the international laundering ring and it becomes apparent that the administration settled with the banks with that knowledge....I see them as part of the problem and chargeable as accessories.

It is a matter of opinion of course and you are welcomed to your own.

Yes I remember the non-Trayvon Pictures from the face book account that I mistakenly labeled as pictures of Martin....I also remember making a full retraction with apologies to the forum members for being compulsive and not double-checking.
 

Friday13

Governor
Hmmm...I don't recall President Obama holding that office 2003 - 2007...seems to me that was a GOP criminal admin...
 

justoffal

Senator
Pretty self evident I think.....

Being called out on Bullshit indicates a stubbornness to stand behind an insupportable position..... that is not what happened at that particular time on that particular thread.
 

justoffal

Senator
Hey...who says the GOP is innocent? The fact is that it is the current administration that took the pay off to close their eyes while the banks foreclose with abandon. What? You think that $2000.00 is fair compensation for a house that has been pilfered out from underneath you? I don't.
 
Top