New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Race relations worsening since Obama's election

segamegadrive said:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...cbd-11e4-b821-503cc7efed9e_story.html?hpid=z1

And again Obama speaks about our problems. But I don`t think that he`s interested in solving this question. It`s an old issue and current events show that the situation got even worser than one could imagine...

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/a...ace-relations-worsening-since-obamas-election
Click to expand...
Someone beatcha to it:

https://www.politicaljack.com/threads/most-see-race-relaton-worse-under-obama.77192/
 
Just to keep score: Obama is 0 for 3 in high profile race cases.

He said the Caimbridge police "acted stupidly" before we knew everything, and that blew up in his face.

He sided with Trayvon before the evidence was known.

He sided with the "Gentle Giant" Michael Brown before the evidence was known.

He should stay out of these things for two reasons:

1. He's inciting tension and anger
2. He's not very good at picking the right side.
 
Mr. Friscus said:
Just to keep score: Obama is 0 for 3 in high profile race cases.

He said the Caimbridge police "acted stupidly" before we knew everything, and that blew up in his face.

He sided with Trayvon before the evidence was known.

He sided with the "Gentle Giant" Michael Brown before the evidence was known.

He should stay out of these things for two reasons:

1. He's inciting tension and anger
2. He's not very good at picking the right side.
Click to expand...

1. He was right. Arresting a man on his front porch was stupid. The professor had not broken a law and the proof is that the city dropped the charges.
2. Trayvon was indicted by Mr. Martin...convicted by Mr. Martin...and executed by Mr. Martin....Martin was a threat...he stalked Trayvon. Trayvon responded to the threat by confronting Martin...and Martin killed him.
3. Obama "sided" with Brown? Got a link to that?

What you consider the "right" side is far from that for most of us.
 
Never mind the rule of law, Blacks are bound and determined that they are going to be victims. The easy way to account for their failures. Drop out of school, rob, sell drugs and get in trouble with the law, its them picking on them, no matter the disproportionate crime statistics.
Until Blacks face their problems, mostly culture related nothing will change. The Black problem is caused by the blacks. Society has bent over backward to get them going, but they are incapable of taking advantage of what is offered.
 
Fast Eddy said:
Never mind the rule of law, Blacks are bound and determined that they are going to be victims. The easy way to account for their failures. Drop out of school, rob, sell drugs and get in trouble with the law, its them picking on them, no matter the disproportionate crime statistics.
Until Blacks face their problems, mostly culture related nothing will change. The Black problem is caused by the blacks. Society has bent over backward to get them going, but they are incapable of taking advantage of what is offered.
Click to expand...
Partly I can agree with you but partly not.
1) "Blacks are bound and determined that they are going to be victims"
Unfortunately, it's true
2) "Drop out of school, rob, sell drugs and get in trouble with the law, its them picking on them, no matter the disproportionate crime statistics."
So, it's hard to argue with statistics.
3) The Black problem is caused by the blacks.
I don't think so. Segregation was abolished just 50 years ago. 50 years is nothing for history.
 
Fast Eddy said:
Never mind the rule of law, Blacks are bound and determined that they are going to be victims. The easy way to account for their failures. Drop out of school, rob, sell drugs and get in trouble with the law, its them picking on them, no matter the disproportionate crime statistics.
Until Blacks face their problems, mostly culture related nothing will change. The Black problem is caused by the blacks. Society has bent over backward to get them going, but they are incapable of taking advantage of what is offered.
Click to expand...
Thanks for the transcript of Rush's show today, ditto head.
 
segamegadrive said:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...cbd-11e4-b821-503cc7efed9e_story.html?hpid=z1

And again Obama speaks about our problems. But I don`t think that he`s interested in solving this question. It`s an old issue and current events show that the situation got even worser than one could imagine...

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/a...ace-relations-worsening-since-obamas-election
Click to expand...
Yeah....and his term started out with such a high level of racial harmony that it spawned a "new" political party just to oppose him. If they had formed for the reasons they claim, they'd have formed under Bush years before....you know.... when the damage was being done. But the real outrage was over "putting the white back in the White House".

art.obama.protest.sign.cnn.jpg
RacistObamaPic54.jpg
racist-hang-in-there-obama.jpg
 
middleview said:
1. He was right. Arresting a man on his front porch was stupid. The professor had not broken a law and the proof is that the city dropped the charges.
Click to expand...
Sergeant Crowley said that he arrested Professor Gates because the professor got angry after being asked for identification and proof of his address, and continued his “tirade after being warned multiple times.” The sergeant said that the professor had berated him, and was adamant that he was following police procedures in making the arrest.Professor Gates said in an interview Tuesday that he wanted a personal apology from the sergeant, and that he might still consider suing the police department.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/24/us/24cambridge.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

No, the cop was actually there to help Gates, and THEN Gates broke the law.

However, what makes Obama look foolish here is this: Obama said prior to everything that he didn't know the specifics or the facts. If that's the case, why would you judge so harshly?

The New York Times gives us a tip:

In the WEEI interview, Sergeant Crowley, who is white, responded to the president’s comments.

Well, that just about sums it up now!

middleview said:
2. Trayvon was indicted by Mr. Martin...convicted by Mr. Martin...and executed by Mr. Martin....Martin was a threat...he stalked Trayvon. Trayvon responded to the threat by confronting Martin...and Martin killed him.
Click to expand...
Even if your dramatics are correct, overly eyeballing someone who fits a description doesn't allow that person to come assault the "stalker" with ground and pound.

middleview said:
3. Obama "sided" with Brown? Got a link to that?
Click to expand...
This would be the most insinuatory of the three. Of course, you're looking for a direct statement or nothing at all since you're on the defensive for the president.

In pretty much every speech about Ferguson, Obama has lectured about vague "problems" (racism) that exist. The manner in which he brings them up suggests that it's the reason Wilson acted, and pretty obviously so. The charges always start with "We need to have a conversation..." although I'm not sure who he feels needs to have it and where this exchange will take place.

Also, Before the facts were known, Obama was at the UN apologizing for Ferguson.
 
segamegadrive said:
Partly I can agree with you but partly not.
1) "Blacks are bound and determined that they are going to be victims"
Unfortunately, it's true
2) "Drop out of school, rob, sell drugs and get in trouble with the law, its them picking on them, no matter the disproportionate crime statistics."
So, it's hard to argue with statistics.
3) The Black problem is caused by the blacks.
I don't think so. Segregation was abolished just 50 years ago. 50 years is nothing for history.
Click to expand...

You just want to give them a pass in life. You are performing a disservice to them. Until they become accountable and fit in, nothing will get better. The path lies with them.
 
Mr. Friscus said:
Just to keep score: Obama is 0 for 3 in high profile race cases.

He said the Caimbridge police "acted stupidly" before we knew everything, and that blew up in his face.

He sided with Trayvon before the evidence was known.

He sided with the "Gentle Giant" Michael Brown before the evidence was known.

He should stay out of these things for two reasons:

1. He's inciting tension and anger
2. He's not very good at picking the right side.
Click to expand...
I am proud of the way he speaks up in these cases. He shows great restraint and humility. The reason race relations are worsening is because many people didn't want to see a Black man in the White House. It scares them for some reason.
Oh well, he only has 2 more years. Then it will be President Hillary Clinton!:D
 
Fast Eddy said:
Never mind the rule of law, Blacks are bound and determined that they are going to be victims. The easy way to account for their failures. Drop out of school, rob, sell drugs and get in trouble with the law, its them picking on them, no matter the disproportionate crime statistics.
Until Blacks face their problems, mostly culture related nothing will change. The Black problem is caused by the blacks. Society has bent over backward to get them going, but they are incapable of taking advantage of what is offered.
Click to expand...
Don't you ever get tired of beating that dead horse? Give him a break.
 
Fast Eddy said:
Well Shit for brains, I see you take fun in labeling people and calling names, what a childish moron. Quite frankly I could care less what you call me, there needs to be a dialog on race relations with the whites unafraid to speak up. Black culture sucks and is responsible for their ills. They are not victims but try to be every chance they get.

As far as Rush goes, I have only listened to him a few times over the years, but if we sound alike, I thank you for the compliment. Troll on!
Click to expand...
Rush is a hateful, bigoted, dope headed, closet case, fat guy. You sure you want to sound like him?
 
zzigzzag said:
Yeah....and his term started out with such a high level of racial harmony that it spawned a "new" political party just to oppose him. If they had formed for the reasons they claim, they'd have formed under Bush years before....you know.... when the damage was being done. But the real outrage was over "putting the white back in the White House".

art.obama.protest.sign.cnn.jpg
RacistObamaPic54.jpg
racist-hang-in-there-obama.jpg
Click to expand...
Can you believe this ugliness in 21st century America? How sad.
 
Mr. Friscus said:
Sergeant Crowley said that he arrested Professor Gates because the professor got angry after being asked for identification and proof of his address, and continued his “tirade after being warned multiple times.” The sergeant said that the professor had berated him, and was adamant that he was following police procedures in making the arrest.Professor Gates said in an interview Tuesday that he wanted a personal apology from the sergeant, and that he might still consider suing the police department.

.
Click to expand...

Of course...the professor was guilty of a "Tirade". Was that a "felony tirade" or "misdemeanor tirade"...Do you happen to know where in the law tirades might be classified as either lawful or unlawful....

The police officer asked for ID and followed the professor into his house as he went in to get it. The officer was out of bounds at that moment. He had no warrant to enter the property and no reason to think the professor was a threat.

Your comment that the cop was there to help is pretty funny.
 
segamegadrive said:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...cbd-11e4-b821-503cc7efed9e_story.html?hpid=z1

And again Obama speaks about our problems. But I don`t think that he`s interested in solving this question. It`s an old issue and current events show that the situation got even worser than one could imagine...

http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/a...ace-relations-worsening-since-obamas-election
Click to expand...
You don't think that electing a black man as president hasn't brought out not only those who have always been outwardly racist, but also peoples hidden racism and fears about people of color.
 
Sunset Rose said:
I am proud of the way he speaks up in these cases. He shows great restraint and humility. The reason race relations are worsening is because many people didn't want to see a Black man in the White House. It scares them for some reason.
Oh well, he only has 2 more years. Then it will be President Hillary Clinton!:D
Click to expand...

Your pure stupid if you believe race relations got worse because they didn't want a Black man in the WH. Hell, he got a lot of votes he never would have if it wasn't for his blackness. The white guilt thing gave him some pretty big election advantages. He never would have been elected if the majority of whites didn't vote for him. To bad he was so freeking liberal with all his agendas that people now despise his thinking and actions.
As for Hillary, that old drunk couldn't get elected dog catcher. People have come to hate Obama's Uber liberal policies and she is way left of those - no way this worthless human that never has done anything good will ever come close to being elected. Even the Left Wingers are waking up to her idiocy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top