WTF?? Hillary suggested Obama might be assassinated during 2008 primaries?

[as seen on tv]

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/08/09/flashback-hillary-clinton-hinted-obama-assassination-2008/

Wow – no wonder Hillary was so quick to spin Trump’s “second amendment” quip into a pro-assassination rant.

She walked the very same path herself in 2008.

Hillary openly theorized (socialized?) the concept that she HAD to stay in the race due to the ever present and growing worries that “someone” would assassinate Obama before it all ended.

I fail to see a whit of difference between Hillary’s actions in 2008, and her spin of Trumps misbegotten remarks this week.

Hillary – thank you for your hypocrisy, mendacity, and lies. You’re making it a real horse race, and keeping Trump alive in the polls with your history of shenanigans.

Our descent into banana republic politics is complete, between the two of you.

 

[Barbella]

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/08/09/flashback-hillary-clinton-hinted-obama-assassination-2008/

Wow – no wonder Hillary was so quick to spin Trump’s “second amendment” quip into a pro-assassination rant.

She walked the very same path herself in 2008.

Hillary openly theorized (socialized?) the concept that she HAD to stay in the race due to the ever present and growing worries that “someone” would assassinate Obama before it all ended.

I fail to see a whit of difference between Hillary’s actions in 2008, and her spin of Trumps misbegotten remarks this week.

Hillary – thank you for your hypocrisy, mendacity, and lies. You’re making it a real horse race, and keeping Trump alive in the polls with your history of shenanigans.

Our descent into banana republic politics is complete, between the two of you.

There IS no difference. In fact, Trump haters are spinning his remark way, way out of proportion, with the Clinton camp busily fanning the flames.

Honestly, I'm getting mighty sick and tired of it all...

 

[as seen on tv]

There IS no difference. In fact, Trump haters are spinning his remark way, way out of proportion, with the Clinton camp busily fanning the flames.

Honestly, I'm getting mighty sick and tired of it all...

I'm awaiting the appearance of a photoshopped Clinton campaign picture showing Trump dressed as any of the following:

10 - muslim student

9 - Russian soldier

8 - Alamo defender

7 - confederate soldier

6 - a whaling harpooner

5 - using a walker or needing a wheelchair

4 - dallying with an intern (or 3)

3 - drinking an illegal 32 ounce movie theater soda in New York

2 - getting a speeding ticket

1 - more naked melania photos

 

[Sickofleft]

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/08/09/flashback-hillary-clinton-hinted-obama-assassination-2008/

Wow – no wonder Hillary was so quick to spin Trump’s “second amendment” quip into a pro-assassination rant.

She walked the very same path herself in 2008.

Hillary openly theorized (socialized?) the concept that she HAD to stay in the race due to the ever present and growing worries that “someone” would assassinate Obama before it all ended.

I fail to see a whit of difference between Hillary’s actions in 2008, and her spin of Trumps misbegotten remarks this week.

Hillary – thank you for your hypocrisy, mendacity, and lies. You’re making it a real horse race, and keeping Trump alive in the polls with your history of shenanigans.

Our descent into banana republic politics is complete, between the two of you.

It's because they need to make this election about Trumps temperament to be POTUS.

It's all they have and on that alone and only that they have a point.

So any day not talking about a miserably failed foreign policy, her emails, her "charity" .......is a day she wins.

 

[as seen on tv]

It's because they need to make this election about Trumps temperament to be POTUS.

It's all they have and on that alone and only that they have a point.

So any day not talking about a miserably failed foreign policy, her emails, her "charity" .......is a day she wins.

that's the strategy of both candidates - to claim that the other is unfit.

there is precious little campaigning on the issues.

trump's economic address on Monday has already become white noise.

 

[Sickofleft]

that's the strategy of both candidates - to claim that the other is unfit.

I could not agree with both of them more.

 

[as seen on tv]

I could not agree with both of them more.

here's where that path (potentially) takes us:

libertarian and green candidates make it impossible for either Hillary or Trump to win a numerical majority of the popular vote or delegates on election day.

the election is then thrown into the house of representatives (constitutional process). Are they likely to make Trump president, even though Hillary has more "popular votes" than Trump? Or will enough house republicans band together with democrats to name Hillary as "the safer" choice?

 

[Sickofleft]

here's where that path (potentially) takes us:

libertarian and green candidates make it impossible for either Hillary or Trump to win a numerical majority of the popular vote or delegates on election day.

the election is then thrown into the house of representatives (constitutional process). Are they likely to make Trump president, even though Hillary has more "popular votes" than Trump? Or will enough house republicans band together with democrats to name Hillary as "the safer" choice?

That's a good question.

If that "kid" the former CIA guy gets on the ballot in over 30 states..........he will have a shot at winning Utah for example................it would be interesting if he ever factors into this. Not saying he will but it's not impossible.

 

[as seen on tv]

That's a good question.

If that "kid" the former CIA guy gets on the ballot in over 30 states..........he will have a shot at winning Utah for example................it would be interesting if he ever factors into this. Not saying he will but it's not impossible.

in other threads, it is being reported that there will be a '3rd podium" at the presidential debates. which begs the question "who occupies it? Johnson/libertarian? or Stein/Green?

whichever, it's likely to raise howls of protest from the omitted "3rd party candidate"

logically, trump would want Stein on stage, to siphon votes away from Hillary

stein has been generating more press attention and grass roots support. gary Johnson is a milquetoast who wasn't impressive either in the libertarian 2016 convention, or when he ran 4 years ago. Ron Paul would have a better shot at representing them. Or Rand Paul, as far as that goes.

We are slowly becoming more like Europe, with a plethora of single issue or extremist parties which aren't in any way equipped to govern the breadth of nation issues. Will this lead to a parliamentary style governance, coalitions, and perpetual dissatisfaction over gridlock?

some might argue that we're "almost there" regarding dissatisfaction and perpetual gridlock

 

[justoffal]

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/08/09/flashback-hillary-clinton-hinted-obama-assassination-2008/

Wow – no wonder Hillary was so quick to spin Trump’s “second amendment” quip into a pro-assassination rant.

She walked the very same path herself in 2008.

Hillary openly theorized (socialized?) the concept that she HAD to stay in the race due to the ever present and growing worries that “someone” would assassinate Obama before it all ended.

I fail to see a whit of difference between Hillary’s actions in 2008, and her spin of Trumps misbegotten remarks this week.

Hillary – thank you for your hypocrisy, mendacity, and lies. You’re making it a real horse race, and keeping Trump alive in the polls with your history of shenanigans.

Our descent into banana republic politics is complete, between the two of you.

Lefty owns no mirrors ( RickWA Trademark)

" IT'S Different "

JO

 

[as seen on tv]

Lefty owns no mirrors ( RickWA Trademark)

" IT'S Different "

JO

alternatively "just because someone else did it first, doesn't make it right"

 

[justoffal]

alternatively "just because someone else did it first, doesn't make it right"

Yes you are correct however I seriously doubt that Trump actually meant to " SHOOT " at Clinton but the left is not interested in intentions only in appearances. Having said that the second amendment also mentions well organized militia.....that kind of organizing is done without government consent and represents an uprising that is justified by codification. It's the only way the sentence makes any sense. If the people needed permission to organize then the amendment would be meaningless.

JO

 

[protectionist]

There IS no difference. In fact, Trump haters are spinning his remark way, way out of proportion, with the Clinton camp busily fanning the flames.

Honestly, I'm getting mighty sick and tired of it all...

When are they NOT "spinning his remarks way, way out of proportion" ?? That's all they've been doing for more than a year now.

 

[protectionist]

It's because they need to make this election about Trumps temperament to be POTUS.

It's all they have and on that alone and only that they have a point.

So any day not talking about a miserably failed foreign policy, her emails, her "charity" .......is a day she wins.

She is deeply into DEFLECTION politics.

 

[protectionist]

in other threads, it is being reported that there will be a '3rd podium" at the presidential debates. which begs the question "who occupies it? Johnson/libertarian? or Stein/Green?

whichever, it's likely to raise howls of protest from the omitted "3rd party candidate"

logically, trump would want Stein on stage, to siphon votes away from Hillary

stein has been generating more press attention and grass roots support. gary Johnson is a milquetoast who wasn't impressive either in the libertarian 2016 convention, or when he ran 4 years ago. Ron Paul would have a better shot at representing them. Or Rand Paul, as far as that goes.

We are slowly becoming more like Europe, with a plethora of single issue or extremist parties which aren't in any way equipped to govern the breadth of nation issues. Will this lead to a parliamentary style governance, coalitions, and perpetual dissatisfaction over gridlock?

some might argue that we're "almost there" regarding dissatisfaction and perpetual gridlock

Trump had good policies on immigration, Muslims, the military, gun rights, energy, and trade. Do you disagree with them ? If so, why ?

 

[Capitalist]

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/08/09/flashback-hillary-clinton-hinted-obama-assassination-2008/

Wow – no wonder Hillary was so quick to spin Trump’s “second amendment” quip into a pro-assassination rant.

She walked the very same path herself in 2008.

Hillary openly theorized (socialized?) the concept that she HAD to stay in the race due to the ever present and growing worries that “someone” would assassinate Obama before it all ended.

I fail to see a whit of difference between Hillary’s actions in 2008, and her spin of Trumps misbegotten remarks this week.

Hillary – thank you for your hypocrisy, mendacity, and lies. You’re making it a real horse race, and keeping Trump alive in the polls with your history of shenanigans.

Our descent into banana republic politics is complete, between the two of you.

Overthrowing tyranny is a purely defensive act. Trump should offer no apology.

Having said that, they both are lame. I'm sick of both of them and I'm leaning heavily towards the Constitution Party--formerly the Tax Payers Party.

And I'm glad you think that about Johnson. I was totally underwhelmed by him.

 

[protectionist]

Overthrowing tyranny is a purely defensive act. Trump should offer no apology.

Having said that, they both are lame. I'm sick of both of them and I'm leaning heavily towards the Constitution Party--formerly the Tax Payers Party.

And I'm glad you think that about Johnson. I was totally underwhelmed by him.

Questions of Post # 15 goes for you too.

 

[middleview]

I'm awaiting the appearance of a photoshopped Clinton campaign picture showing Trump dressed as any of the following:

10 - muslim student

9 - Russian soldier

8 - Alamo defender

7 - confederate soldier

6 - a whaling harpooner

5 - using a walker or needing a wheelchair

4 - dallying with an intern (or 3)

3 - drinking an illegal 32 ounce movie theater soda in New York

2 - getting a speeding ticket

1 - more naked melania photos

The ads of Trump's own speeches are more than enough.

 

[Saladin2]

2008?......Try to keep up.....America is sick of all you Trump apologists and flunkys constantly trying to justify his idiotic behavior.....Trump is going to get his ass beat big time and he richly deserves it

 

[protectionist]

2008?......Try to keep up.....America is sick of all you Trump apologists and flunkys constantly trying to justify his idiotic behavior.....Trump is going to get his ass beat big time and he richly deserves it

Trump's behavior ? HA HA HA. Pheeeew! (high-pitched whistle) The Clintons kill 50 people, kill 4 more in Benghazi, damage national security putting top secret SAPs on unsecured server. lie about emails, lie (to Chris Wallace) about her lying, lie about eveything from joining the marines, to playing soccer, to being shot at, propose to allow the ISIS trojan horse, have long term friendly ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, flood the country with job-stealing and remittance-sending illegal aliens, and then protect them in Sanctuary Cities, and you are whining about Trump's BEHAVIOR ?

Sheeeesh!! Is there a doctor in the house ?