New Posts
By:
Filters
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Wow. Obama's 3rd and 4th term quest is a masterpiece

Barbella

Barbella

Senator
Machiavellian, certainly. Underhanded? Absolutely. Devious? You bet! But downright brilliant, nevertheless.

1.) make sure a sick old woman is nominated, and 'support' her campaign...

And then

2) just before the election, replace her WITH YOUR WIFE, thus ensuring your continued reign.

[Unwelcome language removed] amazing.
 
Last edited:
Barbella said:
Machiavellian, certainly. Underhanded? Absolutely. Devious? You bet! But downright brilliant, nevertheless.

1.) make sure a sick old woman is nominated, and 'support' her campaign...

And then

2) just before the election, replace her WITH YOUR WIFE, thus ensuring your continued reign.

[Unwelcome language removed] amazing.
Click to expand...
Normally, I don't like to take money off the *edited*, but I'll make an exception here. How would you like to place a bet on this? I'll be you $1000 that Michelle Obama won't be the candidate in this election. I'll even give you ten-to-one odds, such that if she isn't, you only owe me $100. Deal?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Barbella said:
Machiavellian, certainly. Underhanded? Absolutely. Devious? You bet! But downright brilliant, nevertheless.

1.) make sure a sick old woman is nominated, and 'support' her campaign...

And then

2) just before the election, replace her WITH YOUR WIFE, thus ensuring your continued reign.

[Unwelcome language removed] amazing.
Click to expand...

NOTHING Obama does would surprise me. But what about political experience? @Spamature has a strict rule about the presidency. He won't vote for anyone for president that hasn't held elected office. I'm sure he and others concerned about political experience will be along her any moment now to voice their disapproval of Michelle Obama as a candidate.
 
The Thinker said:
NOTHING Obama does would surprise me. But what about political experience? @Spamature has a strict rule about the presidency. He won't vote for anyone for president that hasn't held elected office. I'm sure he and others concerned about political experience will be along her any moment now to voice their disapproval of Michelle Obama as a candidate.
Click to expand...

Classic strawman.

Now, we have to disavow someone who is not a candidate for their lack of experience.
 
Craig said:
Classic strawman.

Now, we have to disavow someone who is not a candidate for their lack of experience.
Click to expand...

It's called discussing the OP. You should probably exit this thread immediately since Michelle Obama is not a candidate.

See ya!
 
The Thinker said:
It's called discussing the OP. You should probably exit this thread immediately since Michelle Obama is not a candidate.

See ya!
Click to expand...

The thread is ridiculous, as you surely realize.

I'm discussing the strawman that the thread is...along with your demands that folks disavow her lack of experience...as a non candidate.

See ya!
 
The Thinker said:
NOTHING Obama does would surprise me. But what about political experience? @Spamature has a strict rule about the presidency. He won't vote for anyone for president that hasn't held elected office. I'm sure he and others concerned about political experience will be along her any moment now to voice their disapproval of Michelle Obama as a candidate.
Click to expand...

Well, that would be their rule NORMALLY, but this is just DIFFERENT...
 
The Thinker said:
NOTHING Obama does would surprise me. But what about political experience? @Spamature has a strict rule about the presidency. He won't vote for anyone for president that hasn't held elected office. I'm sure he and others concerned about political experience will be along her any moment now to voice their disapproval of Michelle Obama as a candidate.
Click to expand...

I never said I would not vote for anyone who has never held elective office. I probably would not for almost anyone if the office they are seeking is POTUS. But if you think that someone with no experience what so ever in a field of work should be given the top job in the world in the field. Then maybe you should explain why. Why should someone with no training or real work experience be given the top leadership job in ANY field of work ?
 
The Thinker said:
I wonder if @Spamature (uh oh, looks like he got a vacation) will comment on this. So far, it's just Craig doing his usual whining.
Click to expand...
You are lucky I was again side lined by who ever, for I have no idea or I would have been slapping you cons six ways to Sunday. You got away with a lot in my absence.
 
Spamature said:
I never said I would not vote for anyone who has never held elective office. I probably would not for almost anyone if the office they are seeking is POTUS. But if you think that someone with no experience what so ever in a field of work should be given the top job in the world in the field. Then maybe you should explain why. Why should someone with no training or real work experience be given the top leadership job in ANY field of work ?
Click to expand...

Duh.... POTUS is the office in question, Einstein. You should probably read before you babble. But at least we're clear you wouldn't vote for Michelle Obama if she were to replace Hillary Clinton. Thanks for going on record.
 
The Thinker said:
Duh.... POTUS is the office in question, Einstein. You should probably read before you babble. But at least we're clear you wouldn't vote for Michelle Obama if she were to replace Hillary Clinton. Thanks for going on record.
Click to expand...

It is not the ONLY elective office. I hope you understand that. And no without the actual experience of hold a high office I would not vote for Michelle Obama to replace a President Hillary Clinton.
 
Barbella said:
Machiavellian, certainly. Underhanded? Absolutely. Devious? You bet! But downright brilliant, nevertheless.

1.) make sure a sick old woman is nominated, and 'support' her campaign...

And then

2) just before the election, replace her WITH YOUR WIFE, thus ensuring your continued reign.

[Unwelcome language removed] amazing.
Click to expand...
I've been hearing this too.
 
Barbella said:
Machiavellian, certainly. Underhanded? Absolutely. Devious? You bet! But downright brilliant, nevertheless.

1.) make sure a sick old woman is nominated, and 'support' her campaign...

And then

2) just before the election, replace her WITH YOUR WIFE, thus ensuring your continued reign.

[Unwelcome language removed] amazing.
Click to expand...

Barack Obama is better than you.
 
Spamature said:
It is not the ONLY elective office. I hope you understand that. And no without the actual experience of hold a high office I would not vote for Michelle Obama to replace a President Hillary Clinton.
Click to expand...

" actual experience of hold a high office"
did you mean holding?
you posted you wouldn't vote for Trump simply due to never holding public office..........
wait, you probably think being First Lady and taking $100,000,000+ in vacations is holding public office!
 
Spamature said:
It is not the ONLY elective office. I hope you understand that. And no without the actual experience of hold a high office I would not vote for Michelle Obama to replace a President Hillary Clinton.
Click to expand...

Cool. I salute you for sticking to your principles.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top