New Posts
  • Hi there guest! Welcome to PoliticalJack.com. Register for free to join our community?

Dems: Only Some Women Should be Heard

Jen

Senator
Oprah Winfrey declared that all women should be heard. Women at the Golden Globes wore black to share their belief that all women should be heard when they stand up and say that a man has sexually harassed or molested or raped them. "ALL" women, they said.

Oh, but.......... they didn't mean it.

Women who have accused any Democrat star who is deemed above the law should NOT EVER be heard. One such woman is Juanita Broaderick who has stood up and claimed rape by Democratic icon Bill Clinton for years now and nobody is listening. She can be called a "bimbo" because she dared to think that she was included in the Democrat mantra of "ALL women should be heard".

It is shameful.

Broaderick tweeted this:

“Hey @Oprah #GoldenGlobes,” tweeted Broaddrick Monday. “Funny I’ve never heard you mention my name. CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW?Guess not. My rapist was/is your friend, Bill Clinton.”

Nope, Juanita. Democrats have judged you not eligible for the "ALL" women thing. You are not heard. Democrats are picky about who gets heard, it seems.

I expect that Democrats here will not post on this thread.............. or if they do they will be full of lame excuses as to why Juanita Broaderick shouldn't be heard.
 
now you now she's different
That's the best answer Democrats have. "That's different".
Dang.
facepalm.gif
 
at least now they have Oprah
:)
Isn't it so very telling that Lefty will NOT respond to any thread that has Juanita Broaderick in it?

PJ Lefty will never admit that Bill Clinton is guilty of sexual harassment and most likely rape. Their response is that "Clinton isn't president now"..................... and of course........... that's the same as saying that Clinton's rape doesn't count because it was done in the past. Of course, they crucified Moore for something done over 30 years ago.

But then...............that's "different".
 
Isn't it so very telling that Lefty will NOT respond to any thread that has Juanita Broaderick in it?

PJ Lefty will never admit that Bill Clinton is guilty of sexual harassment and most likely rape. Their response is that "Clinton isn't president now"..................... and of course........... that's the same as saying that Clinton's rape doesn't count because it was done in the past. Of course, they crucified Moore for something done over 30 years ago.

But then...............that's "different".

Typical and sure avoid post of Slick paying Jones $850,000 to hush up abour everything........(it was Jones wasn't it) so many victims hard to keep them straight

Why wasn't Slick at GG's with Oprah?
 
Typical and sure avoid post of Slick paying Jones $850,000 to hush up abour everything........(it was Jones wasn't it) so many victims hard to keep them straight

Why wasn't Slick at GG's with Oprah?
Slick should have been at GG's with Oprah.............. that would have completed the picture of the whole thing............you know..... women dressed like hookers (in black) to protest the way men treat women.


07OTR2-master675.jpg
 
Slick should have been at GG's with Oprah.............. that would have completed the picture of the whole thing............you know..... women dressed like hookers (in black) to protest the way men treat women.


07OTR2-master675.jpg

Yep...........
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jen
Oprah Winfrey declared that all women should be heard. Women at the Golden Globes wore black to share their belief that all women should be heard when they stand up and say that a man has sexually harassed or molested or raped them. "ALL" women, they said.

Oh, but.......... they didn't mean it.

Women who have accused any Democrat star who is deemed above the law should NOT EVER be heard. One such woman is Juanita Broaderick who has stood up and claimed rape by Democratic icon Bill Clinton for years now and nobody is listening. She can be called a "bimbo" because she dared to think that she was included in the Democrat mantra of "ALL women should be heard".

It is shameful.

Broaderick tweeted this:

“Hey @Oprah #GoldenGlobes,” tweeted Broaddrick Monday. “Funny I’ve never heard you mention my name. CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW?Guess not. My rapist was/is your friend, Bill Clinton.”

Nope, Juanita. Democrats have judged you not eligible for the "ALL" women thing. You are not heard. Democrats are picky about who gets heard, it seems.

I expect that Democrats here will not post on this thread.............. or if they do they will be full of lame excuses as to why Juanita Broaderick shouldn't be heard.

And what about Paula Jones, who was a victim of sexual harassment by Bill Clinton?

Oh I forgot.... "that's different".
 
People for political reasons didn't take the allegations against Clinton seriously enough. Just as people for political reasons don't take the better supported allegations against Trump clearly enough.
 
Slick should have been at GG's with Oprah.............. that would have completed the picture of the whole thing............you know..... women dressed like hookers (in black) to protest the way men treat women.


07OTR2-master675.jpg
The women of the left are really dumb. The only thing dumber are their men.
 
People for political reasons didn't take the allegations against Clinton seriously enough. Just as people for political reasons don't take the better supported allegations against Trump clearly enough.
Ahh. So you do agree with Democrats that not all woman should be heard. If Democrats don't take it "seriously" then the claim of rape isn't significant. ;)
 
https://www.afp.com/en/news/206/french-star-deneuve-defends-mens-right-chat-women-doc-w392z1
From the link;
"What began as freeing women up to speak has today turned into the opposite -- we intimidate people into speaking 'correctly', shout down those who don't fall into line, and those women who refused to bend" to the new realities "are regarded as complicit and traitors."

This entire new line of attack on men, disgusts me as as woman.

I am equal - because I believe I am equal. Because I behave as an equal and because I get respect from men, by being competent, capable and independent. NOT because I whine when I don't get my way or I complain when a tool I use to advance my own agenda, my looks, is exactly what gets me noticed for reasons I disagree with.

Men face all sorts of harassment in different forms in the workforce. And they are supposed to "take it like men". They are supposed to learn to navigate the people tehy work with who are D!cks and work around them. So, for me as a woman who believes myself equal, I expect nothing less than that for myself. Learning to manage and be successful with people in the world who are jerks is a life skill. Someone wanting to treat me like crap because I refuse to sleep with him, is no worse of an insult, no more degrading to me as a person than a guy who is refused a promotion because he doesn't go to the strip bars with his male coworkers. Stop all the fake pearl clutching.

I have no need to put any man down so I can get ahead. And I have no intention of rasing my daughter to believe that she is somehow in competition or that men control or dictate to her. That is only in the heads of those who pray at the alter of perpetual victimhood.
 
This entire new line of attack on men, disgusts me as as woman.

I am equal - because I believe I am equal. Because I behave as an equal and because I get respect from men, by being competent, capable and independent. NOT because I whine when I don't get my way or I complain when a tool I use to advance my own agenda, my looks, is exactly what gets me noticed for reasons I disagree with.

Men face all sorts of harassment in different forms in the workforce. And they are supposed to "take it like men". They are supposed to learn to navigate the people tehy work with who are D!cks and work around them. So, for me as a woman who believes myself equal, I expect nothing less than that for myself. Learning to manage and be successful with people in the world who are jerks is a life skill. Someone wanting to treat me like crap because I refuse to sleep with him, is no worse of an insult, no more degrading to me as a person than a guy who is refused a promotion because he doesn't go to the strip bars with his male coworkers. Stop all the fake pearl clutching.

I have no need to put any man down so I can get ahead. And I have no intention of rasing my daughter to believe that she is somehow in competition or that men control or dictate to her. That is only in the heads of those who pray at the alter of perpetual victimhood.
At this time, I would like to formally offer you a job tutoring my granddaughter. Dead serious here....
 
Oprah Winfrey declared that all women should be heard. Women at the Golden Globes wore black to share their belief that all women should be heard when they stand up and say that a man has sexually harassed or molested or raped them. "ALL" women, they said.

Oh, but.......... they didn't mean it.

Women who have accused any Democrat star who is deemed above the law should NOT EVER be heard. One such woman is Juanita Broaderick who has stood up and claimed rape by Democratic icon Bill Clinton for years now and nobody is listening. She can be called a "bimbo" because she dared to think that she was included in the Democrat mantra of "ALL women should be heard".

It is shameful.

Broaderick tweeted this:

“Hey @Oprah #GoldenGlobes,” tweeted Broaddrick Monday. “Funny I’ve never heard you mention my name. CAN YOU HEAR ME NOW?Guess not. My rapist was/is your friend, Bill Clinton.”

Nope, Juanita. Democrats have judged you not eligible for the "ALL" women thing. You are not heard. Democrats are picky about who gets heard, it seems.

I expect that Democrats here will not post on this thread.............. or if they do they will be full of lame excuses as to why Juanita Broaderick shouldn't be heard.
Juanita Broaddrick has definitely been heard. Hers is practically a household name, unlike the names of women who have accused other presidents of rape (Margie Schoedinger, Selene Walters, the two women who accused Donald Trump of child rape, etc.) But there's a reason that despite the right-wing press having repeatedly given Juanita Broaddrick a megaphone, and the mainstream corporate press sometimes having done the same, most people who have looked into it end up dismissing her accusations. And it's not just the fact those accusations lack so much as a shred of evidence behind them (not even formal criminal charges, of the sort Schoedinger filed against Bush). The reason is that Juanita Broaddrick swore under oath it never happened.

So, if you think Broaddrick should be heard, then listen to her: she testified, under pains and penalties of perjury, as follows:

During the 1992 Presidential campaign there were unfounded rumors and stories circulated that Mr. Clinton had made unwelcome sexual advances toward me in the late seventies. Newspaper and tabloid reporters hounded me and my family, seeking corroboration of these tales. I repeatedly denied the allegations and requested that my family’s privacy be respected. These allegations are untrue and I had hoped that they would no longer haunt me, or cause further disruption to my family..... Specifically, I do not have any information to offer regarding a nonconsensual or unwelcome sexual advance by Mr. Clinton, any discussion offer or provision of state or federal employment or advancement in exchange for sexual conduct, or any use of state troopers to procure women for sex.​
 
At this time, I would like to formally offer you a job tutoring my granddaughter. Dead serious here....

Keep her away from the liberal education system as much as you can and she should be alright.

I have seriously never even doubted or considered my gender in what I wanted to do with my life. The fact that someone may have found me attractive and hit on me or even made disgusting passes at me, does not insult me. Why should it? It says more about him than me. And I have found that those who are politely told thanks, but no thanks, are more than happy to put the advance behind them. So, why shouldn't I be? I think my husband is hot and checked his arse out when we met at the workplace. Is there something wrong with him, for noticing the same thing about me, and having the guts to ask me out? Of course not, how ridiculous.

I am also the mother of a son. And what kind of mother would I be, if I championed things that would benefit my daughter, to the detriment of my son? Raise a strong willed, independent and determined daughter, and you have no reason to stack the deck in her favor or punish those that cross her. Its an insult to an independent person, to insinuate they need help, or the "system" to find retribution of some sort for them. I don't need anyone else, to fight my battles, tyvm.

My parents, when asked by their friends why they were not disturbed about me dating a person who was 7 years older than me, when I was 16, said, they had absolutely no worries about some guy, getting Connie, to do anything that Connie didn't want to do. And if he could figure out how to make that happen, he should tell them, because they had been trying to figure it out for 16 years. Our job is to not raise daughters who will not be tested, insulted, belittled or harassed by attacking, maligning, and silencing other people. That makes them weak. Our job, is to raise daughters who will be tested - and prevail because their faith in themselves and their own abilities. When one door closes another opens. Believe in that, and nothing anyone does to you, can stop you from getting where you want to be. Believe in anything else, and you are a puss. And we should not reward weakness.
 
Juanita Broaddrick has definitely been heard. Hers is practically a household name, unlike the names of women who have accused other presidents of rape (Margie Schoedinger, Selene Walters, the two women who accused Donald Trump of child rape, etc.) But there's a reason that despite the right-wing press having repeatedly given Juanita Broaddrick a megaphone, and the mainstream corporate press sometimes having done the same, most people who have looked into it end up dismissing her accusations. And it's not just the fact those accusations lack so much as a shred of evidence behind them (not even formal criminal charges, of the sort Schoedinger filed against Bush). The reason is that Juanita Broaddrick swore under oath it never happened.

So, if you think Broaddrick should be heard, then listen to her: she testified, under pains and penalties of perjury, as follows:

During the 1992 Presidential campaign there were unfounded rumors and stories circulated that Mr. Clinton had made unwelcome sexual advances toward me in the late seventies. Newspaper and tabloid reporters hounded me and my family, seeking corroboration of these tales. I repeatedly denied the allegations and requested that my family’s privacy be respected. These allegations are untrue and I had hoped that they would no longer haunt me, or cause further disruption to my family..... Specifically, I do not have any information to offer regarding a nonconsensual or unwelcome sexual advance by Mr. Clinton, any discussion offer or provision of state or federal employment or advancement in exchange for sexual conduct, or any use of state troopers to procure women for sex.​
Do you have a link to support what you have written here? Please include that.
 
Back
Top